Misplaced Pages

User talk:JackTheVicar: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:02, 9 May 2015 view sourceJackTheVicar (talk | contribs)5,206 edits Establishment and Incorporation← Previous edit Revision as of 14:09, 9 May 2015 view source JackTheVicar (talk | contribs)5,206 edits Establishment and IncorporationNext edit →
Line 69: Line 69:


Regarding your edit at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Newton,_New_Jersey&diff=661307244&oldid=661292530, I hope you can see that the administrative process of "incorporation" is distinct from when a populated place actually was founded and it is not useful to have one category set used for two different purposes in an indiscriminate manner. I would not be against have ] etc but ] (if you feel strongly about this then it would be no bad thing to revisit the question). As regards ], quoting the article, we have "Newton was first settled ... sometime before 1751", so assuming that the "sometime" in question was not more than 50 years then it would be correct to categorize Newton, New Jersey in ]. Finally, most populated places in the ] categorize by the date that the settlement actually was founded and so I don't really think it correct to say that I am "a user pushing a one-man consensus" as loads of other people have added articles to the category set on the basis of the date of actual foundation. I have played a leading role in establishing some guidelines for the use of the ] and if you disagree with what is written there then why not set out your ideas at ]? ] (]) 13:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC) Regarding your edit at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Newton,_New_Jersey&diff=661307244&oldid=661292530, I hope you can see that the administrative process of "incorporation" is distinct from when a populated place actually was founded and it is not useful to have one category set used for two different purposes in an indiscriminate manner. I would not be against have ] etc but ] (if you feel strongly about this then it would be no bad thing to revisit the question). As regards ], quoting the article, we have "Newton was first settled ... sometime before 1751", so assuming that the "sometime" in question was not more than 50 years then it would be correct to categorize Newton, New Jersey in ]. Finally, most populated places in the ] categorize by the date that the settlement actually was founded and so I don't really think it correct to say that I am "a user pushing a one-man consensus" as loads of other people have added articles to the category set on the basis of the date of actual foundation. I have played a leading role in establishing some guidelines for the use of the ] and if you disagree with what is written there then why not set out your ideas at ]? ] (]) 13:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
* Sorry, {{u|Greenshed}} I'm not really that interested in your one-man crusade or a 9-year old discussion that decides nothing. All of NJ's municipalities, and many other states, are categorized this way without complaint. FYI: 11 April 1864 is the date the Town of Newton was established. If you want to play a game of semantics vis-a-vis established, incorporated, etc. don't waste my time or start edit-warring over this pedantic nonsense.--] (]) 14:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC) * Sorry, {{u|Greenshed}} I'm not really that interested in your one-man crusade or a 9-year old discussion that decides nothing. All of NJ's municipalities, and many other states, are categorized this way without complaint. as for your precious category, the advisory of " or otherwise came into existence" in its inclusion statement is overly broad....FYI: 11 April 1864 is the date the Town of Newton was established, legally-came into existence, and the inclusion of Newton in 1864 is not unwarranted. If you want to play a game of semantics vis-a-vis established, incorporated, etc. don't waste my time or start edit-warring over this pedantic nonsense.--] (]) 14:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:09, 9 May 2015

Talk page of JackTheVicar

A page you started (Christ Church, Newton) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Christ Church, Newton, JackTheVicar!

Misplaced Pages editor WordSeventeen just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Excellent article! thank-you.

To reply, leave a comment on WordSeventeen's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Christ Church, Newton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Episcopalian
Richard Crashaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Saint Bridget

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Newton, New Jersey may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Sussex County.<ref name="GR6">], ]. Accessed April 7, 2015.</ref><ref name=NACo>[http://www.
  • About Us: Affiliated Parish], St Joseph's Regional School. Retrieved 15 April 2015.</ref><ref>[http://www.stjosephregionalschool.org/about/accreditation About Us: Accreditation}, St Joseph's Regional School, Newton, New Jersey. Retrieved 15 April 2015.</ref> St Joseph's

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:35, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Undoing your Newton edits

I had seen your edits, but forget that they had been made while I was reverting the edits of a jerk whose been stalking my edits. Sorry and thanks for the edits you've made related to Newton and its schools. Alansohn (talk) 14:55, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Christ Church, Newton

Hello! Your submission of Christ Church, Newton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Yoninah I replied to your concerns at the nomination page. Briefly, I think your ALT1 in unacceptable, and I do not believe your concern is actionable vis-à-vis the criteria.

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of New Jersey Forest Fire Service fire towers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monroe Township, New Jersey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

List of New Jersey Forest Fire Service fire towers

Thanks for your hard work on the list of New Jersey Forest Fire Service fire towers. I noticed it appear as a new article. I see you listed the "Cedar Bridge Lookout Tower". When I wrote the article Aserdaten, New Jersey I added a line about that tower. Unfortunately, the link to the source I used is temporarily dead (Google Books rotates what's free). My source said that tower was made inactive in 1983 (and then likely moved to its new location). Did you come across any info about the Aserdaten tower? Also, would you be able to add a link to each of your geo-coordinates (I did the first one)? Thanks again. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:24, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Magnolia677 - for another link to the Aserdaten tower, look at the Forest Fire Lookout Association listing for NJ here which I used as a source on the list. It might have the previous tower location you are looking for. I came across your page on Aserdaten when I was researching the article. Also, when i have that problem with the Google books link...I just mention the page number in the citation, but bring the link in the citation to the book just the book's URL without the specific page parameter. Based on a good citation either way, any users and other editors should accept the source assuming good faith. --JackTheVicar (talk) 10:57, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Magnolia677 - many thanks for the geocoord example, I have had it on my mind to start looking for that for about a week now.--JackTheVicar (talk) 14:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roland La Starza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State Armory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Christ Church, Newton

Updated DYK queryOn 7 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Christ Church, Newton, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that on August 15, 1774, Christ Church, Newton (pictured), an Episcopal church in Newton, New Jersey, was granted a charter by Royal Governor William Franklin on behalf of Britain's King George III? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Christ Church, Newton. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:29, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Nice article, thank you. I would like to improve a church article, St. Martin, Idstein, ideas welcome, - more history from German needs to be included but I lack the terms in English,

Establishment and Incorporation

Regarding your edit at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Newton,_New_Jersey&diff=661307244&oldid=661292530, I hope you can see that the administrative process of "incorporation" is distinct from when a populated place actually was founded and it is not useful to have one category set used for two different purposes in an indiscriminate manner. I would not be against have Category:Populated places incorporated in 1864 etc but others previously decided against this (if you feel strongly about this then it would be no bad thing to revisit the question). As regards Newton, New Jersey, quoting the article, we have "Newton was first settled ... sometime before 1751", so assuming that the "sometime" in question was not more than 50 years then it would be correct to categorize Newton, New Jersey in Category:Populated places established in the 18th century. Finally, most populated places in the Category:Populated places by year of establishment categorize by the date that the settlement actually was founded and so I don't really think it correct to say that I am "a user pushing a one-man consensus" as loads of other people have added articles to the category set on the basis of the date of actual foundation. I have played a leading role in establishing some guidelines for the use of the Category:Populated places by year of establishment and if you disagree with what is written there then why not set out your ideas at Category talk:Populated places by year of establishment? Greenshed (talk) 13:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Sorry, Greenshed I'm not really that interested in your one-man crusade or a 9-year old discussion that decides nothing. All of NJ's municipalities, and many other states, are categorized this way without complaint. as for your precious category, the advisory of " or otherwise came into existence" in its inclusion statement is overly broad....FYI: 11 April 1864 is the date the Town of Newton was established, legally-came into existence, and the inclusion of Newton in 1864 is not unwarranted. If you want to play a game of semantics vis-a-vis established, incorporated, etc. don't waste my time or start edit-warring over this pedantic nonsense.--JackTheVicar (talk) 14:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC)