| Revision as of 10:25, 4 June 2015 editJytdog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers187,951 edits →Commenting at Bfpage's talk page: yep← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:51, 4 June 2015 edit undoJytdog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers187,951 editsm →Commenting at Bfpage's talk page: typoNext edit → | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| Hey, Jytdog. Since ] no longer wants you posting at User talk:Bfpage, and since Bfpage has removed your posts in ways that left the remaining text somewhat incoherent or without defense (such as when you noted that you did not call me a disruptive editor), as seen and , I think it's best that you only comment there unless necessary. It seems you stopped commenting there after the removal of your posts. The reason that I don't comment there unless necessary is because besides my history with Bfpage, Bfpage, as you know, sometimes makes changes to the others' posts in ways that conflict with ]. I will try not to interact with Bfpage, which is what I had been doing for months, and I will try not to mention Bfpage after this point unless necessary, which is fair considering what has been outlined at ] by Bfpage and ]. ] (]) 06:06, 4 June 2015 (UTC) | Hey, Jytdog. Since ] no longer wants you posting at User talk:Bfpage, and since Bfpage has removed your posts in ways that left the remaining text somewhat incoherent or without defense (such as when you noted that you did not call me a disruptive editor), as seen and , I think it's best that you only comment there unless necessary. It seems you stopped commenting there after the removal of your posts. The reason that I don't comment there unless necessary is because besides my history with Bfpage, Bfpage, as you know, sometimes makes changes to the others' posts in ways that conflict with ]. I will try not to interact with Bfpage, which is what I had been doing for months, and I will try not to mention Bfpage after this point unless necessary, which is fair considering what has been outlined at ] by Bfpage and ]. ] (]) 06:06, 4 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :agreed. in , i said that i wasn't going to engage with her anymore. my was not to her but to GregKaye. after that, , so no, i will not be writing there any more, to anyone! and i don't intend to interact with her unless she shows up at an article I already edit. ] (]) 10:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC) | :agreed. in , i said that i wasn't going to engage with her anymore. my was not to her but to GregKaye. after that, , so no, i will not be writing there any more, to anyone! and i don't intend to interact with her unless she shows up at an article I already edit. ] (]) 10:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:51, 4 June 2015
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Welcome!
Hello, Jytdog, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Edcolins (talk) 18:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Aspirin
Hey Jytdog, I only just now noticed that you reverted this edit by saying that it lacked context. That's true, it could have done with more context, but I think the more productive approach would have been to drop me a note asking for some more context. Safety regulations surrounding the production of aspirin are really important because it is such a powerful drug and as such, the information has since been restored by another editor with more context. Please, next time, assume more good faith on my part. Best, Emily Temple-Wood (NIOSH) (talk) 00:52, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- holy exploding aspirin batman! please make sure to include context when you add content like that. this is a general encyclopedia - i know occupational stuff is huge for you but it is irrelevant to probably 99% of our readers and we don't want to scare the crap out of them. Please keep UNDUE and context in mind. thanks! Jytdog (talk) 01:05, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Heh, I'm stealing that as an expression. :) I'll be more mindful of context - as a heads-up, I'm planning to write more about production of pharmaceuticals and occupational hazards of administering/compounding certain drugs (mainly chemo drugs), if you want to take a look. Best, Emily Temple-Wood (NIOSH) (talk) 02:13, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- can i suggest that you ask at WP:MED about doing that more broadly? for me, i think that is really specialist information and to be frank i don't think it belongs in our articles. some articles have really basic chemistry about drugs but i am unaware of any drug articles that talk about actual drugs/devices/diagnostics/medical equipment manufacturing, much less risk to workers in manufacturing. the same thing is true about the practice of medicine in our health articles - there is not much about what doctors/nurses/technicians actually do, much less what the risks to them are. i think it would be an interesting discussion. Jytdog (talk) 02:20, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sure, I'm happy to start up a discussion there. I think it's reasonable to include because we do talk about the synthesis of many drugs, but we'll see what people say. Emily Temple-Wood (NIOSH) (talk) 02:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- the synthesis is basic lab bench stuff. not manufacturing. thanks for opening the discussion! i will wait to weigh in, to see what others say. lovely interacting with you. Jytdog (talk) 02:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- You as well! :) Emily Temple-Wood (NIOSH) (talk) 03:06, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- the synthesis is basic lab bench stuff. not manufacturing. thanks for opening the discussion! i will wait to weigh in, to see what others say. lovely interacting with you. Jytdog (talk) 02:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sure, I'm happy to start up a discussion there. I think it's reasonable to include because we do talk about the synthesis of many drugs, but we'll see what people say. Emily Temple-Wood (NIOSH) (talk) 02:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- can i suggest that you ask at WP:MED about doing that more broadly? for me, i think that is really specialist information and to be frank i don't think it belongs in our articles. some articles have really basic chemistry about drugs but i am unaware of any drug articles that talk about actual drugs/devices/diagnostics/medical equipment manufacturing, much less risk to workers in manufacturing. the same thing is true about the practice of medicine in our health articles - there is not much about what doctors/nurses/technicians actually do, much less what the risks to them are. i think it would be an interesting discussion. Jytdog (talk) 02:20, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Heh, I'm stealing that as an expression. :) I'll be more mindful of context - as a heads-up, I'm planning to write more about production of pharmaceuticals and occupational hazards of administering/compounding certain drugs (mainly chemo drugs), if you want to take a look. Best, Emily Temple-Wood (NIOSH) (talk) 02:13, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Commenting at Bfpage's talk page
Hey, Jytdog. Since Bfpage no longer wants you posting at User talk:Bfpage, and since Bfpage has removed your posts in ways that left the remaining text somewhat incoherent or without defense (such as when you noted that you did not call me a disruptive editor), as seen here and here, I think it's best that you only comment there unless necessary. It seems you stopped commenting there after the removal of your posts. The reason that I don't comment there unless necessary is because besides my history with Bfpage, Bfpage, as you know, sometimes makes changes to the others' posts in ways that conflict with WP:Talk. I will try not to interact with Bfpage, which is what I had been doing for months, and I will try not to mention Bfpage after this point unless necessary, which is fair considering what has been outlined at User talk:Bfpage/guidelines by Bfpage and Kevin Gorman. Flyer22 (talk) 06:06, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- agreed. in my last remark to BfPage, i said that i wasn't going to engage with her anymore. my last remark on her Talk page was not to her but to GregKaye. after that, she banned me from her talk page, so no, i will not be writing there any more, to anyone! and i don't intend to interact with her unless she shows up at an article I already edit. Jytdog (talk) 10:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC)