Revision as of 21:03, 29 July 2006 editBailan (talk | contribs)16 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:06, 29 July 2006 edit undoBailan (talk | contribs)16 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
== 3RR Violation on Martin Luther Page == | == 3RR Violation on Martin Luther Page == | ||
Penya, just a friendly note to warn you that you have violated ] on the ] page. Please be careful going forward. There is a very low tolerance for 3RR on Misplaced Pages. ] 21:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC) | Penya, just a friendly note to warn you that you have violated ] on the ] page. Please be careful going forward. There is a very low tolerance for 3RR on Misplaced Pages. You made reversions on the page five times in the past twenty-four hours. I would advise you to self-revert to avoid getting a block. ] 21:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:06, 29 July 2006
- Archive 1 - 14:25, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
- Archive 2 - 18:13, 02 February 2006 (UTC)
- Archive 3 - 02:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I will generally respond to your comments on this page unless you specifically request otherwise.
Welcome
Please leave a message at the bottom of this page and I'll be happy to respond here or at your user page. Everything written here will eventually be archived, but never deleted or modified (except for error correction). Peyna 14:25, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Missouri article
Thank you for your help suppressing the POV edits; not enough people even try. :D --Doyel 14:39, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- I appreciate it; some people don't realize that POV can be something very innocuous in appearance. POV isn't limited to controversial topics. Peyna 21:53, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Sarah brewer
Thanks for your note on my talk page. I'll remember to check empty pages' histories in the future (or try to, anyway :) ), when speedy tagging them. Nothing wrong with getting it right. RandyWang (/review me!) 01:36, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- No problem, I didn't mean to be a nit-picker; but I've often tagged pages for speedy without bothering to look at the history and made much more egregious errors than yours. Peyna 01:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Not nitpicking, it was a helpful comment (I've already put it to use on one article). Thanks again. RandyWang (/review me!) 02:05, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Martin Luther Image Link
Dear Payna: I created this cat and put it where it is. I really don't mind you moving it. I'll say so if the tempest keeps brewing. --CTSWyneken 12:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think the category is a great idea; but usually the top of the article is reserved for disambig stuff; the image thing, while impressive and useful, probably doesn't need to be up there. I've done all that I'll do with it, but thanks. Peyna 13:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to the Supreme Court wikiproject
Glad to see you joined up. Let me know if I can do anything for you or just leave a message on the projects talk page. Cheers!--Kchase T 18:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
3RR Violation on Martin Luther Page
Penya, just a friendly note to warn you that you have violated WP:3RR on the Martin Luther page. Please be careful going forward. There is a very low tolerance for 3RR on Misplaced Pages. You made reversions on the page five times in the past twenty-four hours. I would advise you to self-revert to avoid getting a block. Bailan 21:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)