| Revision as of 20:40, 6 August 2015 editSchwarzschild Point (talk | contribs)214 edits →August 2015← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:16, 7 August 2015 edit undoSchwarzschild Point (talk | contribs)214 edits Dustbining vandalismNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == August 2015 == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. Misplaced Pages is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a ]. Your recent edit to ] seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-npov1 --> ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 20:24, 6 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 20:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm reporting you for this, it's obvious you don't know what an edit war is. ] ] 20:40, 6 August 2015 (UTC) | |||