| Revision as of 08:35, 18 August 2015 view sourceCebr1979 (talk | contribs)10,843 edits We were never in mid-discussion, you were just busy being wrong and how I operate my talk page is of my business alone... Unless, of course, you have some sort of proof of your own personal feelings towards talk pages being fact?← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:39, 22 August 2015 view source SMcCandlish (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors201,793 edits →CT: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == CT == | |||
| Do you find that CT is regularly relying on ] tactics to disrupt RfCs and other proceedings? I'm considering a ] action to prevent further disruption at ], but I'm not certain if this is a one-time freakout, or a consistent pattern. If it's just a one-off I may simply ignore it unless it worsens, but if this is habitual, a stop needs to be put to it. I know I've seen him disputatious before in style/naming matters, but that's nothing new for many of us. It's this tactic of blatantly lying again and again about what others' positions, statements, and arguments are, in an attempt to poison incoming commenters views, and "steer" them into "voting" his way, that is of concern to me here. I don't follow his activities here enough to know if this is consistent uncivil behavior or not. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — ] ] ] ≽<sup>ʌ</sup>ⱷ҅<sub>ᴥ</sub>ⱷ<sup>ʌ</sup>≼ </span> 03:39, 22 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:39, 22 August 2015
CT
Do you find that CT is regularly relying on straw man tactics to disrupt RfCs and other proceedings? I'm considering a WP:ANI action to prevent further disruption at WT:MOS, but I'm not certain if this is a one-time freakout, or a consistent pattern. If it's just a one-off I may simply ignore it unless it worsens, but if this is habitual, a stop needs to be put to it. I know I've seen him disputatious before in style/naming matters, but that's nothing new for many of us. It's this tactic of blatantly lying again and again about what others' positions, statements, and arguments are, in an attempt to poison incoming commenters views, and "steer" them into "voting" his way, that is of concern to me here. I don't follow his activities here enough to know if this is consistent uncivil behavior or not. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ⱷ҅ᴥⱷ≼ 03:39, 22 August 2015 (UTC)