Misplaced Pages

User talk:Odarcan: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:19, 25 September 2011 editIan.thomson (talk | contribs)58,562 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 12:11, 23 September 2015 edit undoRicky81682 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users161,010 edits →Talk:Flower of Life: new sectionNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:


{{Talkback|Ian.thomson|hello ian (13 tablets)}} {{Talkback|Ian.thomson|hello ian (13 tablets)}}

== ] ==

Stop wasting people's time arguing at ]. It is not going anywhere and it will not result in the restoration of any article. The proper remedy is to make a case to dispute the closing about ] (or argue that new information for a basis for a new article) at ]. There will no be voting on restoring ''another'' article at that talk page, it's not the appropriate page. These procedures may seen arcane and idiotic but they have been developed over ''years'' and I suggest you review the policies and the basis for overturning any discussions there before going ahead or at least consider a middle ground like asking for a restoration of the page as a draft or something rather than continuing this routine that will ultimately end up nowhere. -- ] (]) 12:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:11, 23 September 2015

Welcome!

Hello, Odarcan, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 13 Emerald Tablets, may not conform to some of Misplaced Pages's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 20:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 13 Emerald Tablets

The article 13 Emerald Tablets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The book was made up by Doreal (who we do not advertise for), no WP:RSs, nothing estalishing WP:NOTE.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Odarcan. You have new messages at Ian.thomson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talk:Flower of Life

Stop wasting people's time arguing at Talk:Flower of Life. It is not going anywhere and it will not result in the restoration of any article. The proper remedy is to make a case to dispute the closing about Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Flower of Life (2nd nomination) (or argue that new information for a basis for a new article) at WP:DRV. There will no be voting on restoring another article at that talk page, it's not the appropriate page. These procedures may seen arcane and idiotic but they have been developed over years and I suggest you review the policies and the basis for overturning any discussions there before going ahead or at least consider a middle ground like asking for a restoration of the page as a draft or something rather than continuing this routine that will ultimately end up nowhere. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 12:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)