| Revision as of 12:51, 2 October 2015 editRms125a@hotmail.com (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users266,337 edits →Dujam II Frankopan: edit warring warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:19, 4 October 2015 edit undoTuvixer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,729 edits →October 2015: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
| ==Edit warring in re Tuđman page== | ==Edit warring in re Tuđman page== | ||
| Please stop edit warring or you risk violating ], which would result in a block from editing privileges. ] 12:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC) | Please stop edit warring or you risk violating ], which would result in a block from editing privileges. ] 12:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == October 2015 == | |||
| ] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. Your edits appear to be ] and have been ] or removed. | |||
| * If you are engaged in an article ] with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's ] page, and ask for independent help at one of the ]. | |||
| * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ]. | |||
| Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's ], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> | |||
| ] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. Your edits appear to be ] and have been ] or removed. | |||
| * If you are engaged in an article ] with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's ] page, and ask for independent help at one of the ]. | |||
| * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ]. | |||
| Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's ], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --] (]) 12:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:19, 4 October 2015
Welcome
|
Invitation
Invitation to enter your counsels in Talk:Josip Broz Tito#NPOV formatTeo Pitta (talk) 16:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Puppet
Hello. I would like to inform you that the user Special:Contributions/72.66.12.17 is a puppet who came from Serbian Misplaced Pages since he got blocked indefinitely over there. See here. He is a puppet of another user that got banned for disruptive behavior. See here. He now turned to English Misplaced Pages and shows the same attitude that already got him blocked 2 times. Detoner (talk) 17:26, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, I also reinforce that. 72.66.12.17 also contributed to the debate under the Nikola Tesla article with a very rude behavior considering Croatians or Hungarians with a very stuck-up pedantry, but of course when his stupidities were demonstrated he/she could answer only with a blatant primitivity. Please guard the Croatia_in_the_union_with_Hungary article, of course we Hungarians acknowledge Croatia as a separate country that we had a personal union with. We don't care about some non-experts POWs, even they are able to be cited by the Misplaced Pages rules what they think about Croatia and Hungary's relation. We have the original documents, the laws and we have the common history, we know better what happened between us than some ignorant outsiders. Regards(KIENGIR (talk) 22:37, 3 July 2015 (UTC))
Hello, again. I think something should be done with the mentioned editor. He is being very disruptive on Military Froniter article. I've done my part and the research but the sock puppet report has prolonged. Detoner (talk) 17:21, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Military Froniter
Hello. I noticed you were active on Military Frontier article. Could you consider sharing your opinion in this discussion. I wanted to introduce a simple edit, which itself is a direct quote from the source listed in the article, but another user keeps objecting irrationally. He even claims the source says something which it does not, and when I ask him to provide a quote, he refuses. I really do not know what to do since no other editors are joining, although I invited some who participate in the editing. If no one joins I will be forced to oped a RfC, which by itself is not necessary, since the sources are in consistence with the edit. Thank you. Detoner (talk) 20:01, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Tzowu, would you please join the discussion in Military Froniter talk page. The other editor is behaving very strangely and I don't think us two can reach a consensus. I'm on the verge to accuse him of lying because he constantly repeats that the source says something and refuses to provide a quote. Of course, his claim is completely false. Now he is reverting me with the same argumentation. What is more strange is that he is leaving the very same claim he is disputing in the article. You added the Horvat's quote in the article which he is disputing, but he is reverting my edit and not yours. I simply can't deal with that irrational behavior all by myself. Thank you. Detoner (talk) 21:32, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
I guess you haven't read this yet. The mentioned ip is a puppet, and not only that but several editors already warned of his disruptive behavior. He is also banned from Serbian Misplaced Pages. I don't think you will be able to lead a normal discussion with him, so I haven't even tried, nor I had reverted his nonsense. I'm awaiting the report to get processed. Detoner (talk) 00:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
I would like your support for this edit. FkpCascais had reverted me with the argumentation that both you and I disagreed with. I think we both agree there is a formal and administrative aspect to Military Froniter. I would like to explain it a little better. What do you think of it? If you do not agree, I'm sure we two can reach a consensus. I simply can't deal with FkpCascais's disruptive behavior. He already dragged me in edit warring for nothing, and I know I won't be able to do anything without the support of at least one editor. He objected with the reasoning that the Horvat's quote is speaking of Sabor's demands and not of the kings proclamation. The strange thing is that he left your edit (which is against his claim) in the article and only reverted my elaboration that had not introduced any new claims. Ok, now when you agree that the Horvat's quote is speaking of the kings proclamation we have a consensus and I could do that edit again, but I know he will revert me again, and he obviously knows how to win edit warring, so I need your support on this. I really can't deal with that disruptive behavior alone. Detoner (talk) 00:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Croat–Bosniak War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gabela camp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prison camp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Personal attack
Hello. I'm being accused of POV pushing for the edit that you entered in the article (Horvat). Could you please share your opinion here. Thank you. Detoner (talk) 21:35, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Another edit warring on sight
Hello, I'm again being reverted by the same user on the simplest edit and I feel he will again go to edit warring. Could you possibly resolve this since you were also involved in that article? I think that it is wrong to call much older symbol "Ilirian" only because they had used it in the 19th century. I have nothing against stating that in the corresponding article, but this is an article unrelated to the Ilirian movement that belongs to the 19th century. Thank you. Detoner (talk) 12:25, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Dujam II Frankopan
I've created the Dujam II Frankopan article but I used only Hungarian sources. If you will have time, could you expand the article with Croatian sources (even his wars with Venice is important, but I could not find any data in English or Hungarian). --Norden1990 (talk) 18:49, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- I think I found a Hungarian source about his Venetian conflict. --Norden1990 (talk) 19:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring in re Tuđman page
Please stop edit warring or you risk violating 3RR, which would result in a block from editing privileges. Quis separabit? 12:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Croatian People's Party – Liberal Democrats. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Your recent editing history at Croatian People's Party – Liberal Democrats shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Social Democratic Party of Croatia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Your recent editing history at Social Democratic Party of Croatia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Tuvixer (talk) 12:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)