Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:02, 6 October 2015

	The Original Barnstar
	For dramatically improving Domestic violence against men. InverseHypercube (talk) 09:28, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

((To Archive))

Contested prod Rapid Compression Machine

Hi. I'm contesting speedy deletion of the portfolio strategy page. As I mentioned in my protest msg, It's akin to LEAN or Agile, and many school districts are employing it. I didn't see a page on school district management theory, but maybe I could make one of those and stick "portfolio strategy" in it? Charlotte-Mecklenburg has a page on this. DeKalb has something similar. Jordan 16:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I contested your prod of this article, because a quick google search shows many scientific research articles using this device, including Argonne National Lab. shoy (reactions) 13:13, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I am contesting the speedy deletion of https://en.wikipedia.org/Pop_Medley I have made some changes to add content. Please allow the page to stay. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weezer17 (talk • contribs) 06:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I am contesting the speedy deletion of https://en.wikipedia.org/Pop_Medley_2 & https://en.wikipedia.org/Rock_Medley. I have added content, and would like the pages to stay. If there is something I need to do to keep these 3 pages around, please let me know. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weezer17 (talk • contribs) 06:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Action Hero. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, National Advertising Day, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Action Hero Shoot! 10:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Action Hero. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Pop Medley, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Action Hero Shoot! 14:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

From Hell letter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Specter

Sao Hkun Hkio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Burmese people

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Pop Medley

Your deletion tag was probably removed, you must also check other page which are also unsourced created by the same user. Thanks. --Action Hero Shoot! 14:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Glucosio

Hello Coffee,

I have added the reference list and categories is this better?

https://en.wikipedia.org/Glucosio

Thanks and any feedback you have is appreciated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkerensa (talk • contribs) 17:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Dhaka University Cultural Society

We have sent press release to many media houses...but if it was not authentic, media house like banglanews24 or jaijaidin wouldn't publish the news.

Speedy deletion tags

Please be more patient when placing speedy deletion tags. You placed this tag five minutes after a new user had created an article and was working on it. If an article has been created and is in that same state after a few hours then I think a speedy tag is okay, but five minutes is far too short. Please be more patient. --Pine 03:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed article

Hi CoffeWithMarkets you proposed article i've strated because there are not enough references, but i've put the reference of the official website. I've request to you can you please guide me about referencing in wikipedia in simple language not technical terms because i'm making mistakes but not getting solution. hoping for positive response. Rupika2303 (talk) 08:42, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Rupika2303

Speedy deletion nomination of O-ga

A tag has been placed on O-ga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. -- Tavix 02:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of USS Utah page

Just to let you know someone else added to the USS Utah page that you proposed for deletion. thank you tom991

Speedy deletion nomination of Saaar Protectorate

A tag has been placed on Saaar Protectorate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. -- Tavix 03:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Dear CoffeeWithMarkets I see you had marked my page Uday Kumar Vaish, for speedy deletion i have seen all the promotional bits and got rid of them completely. It's no longer promotional, would request you to kindly judge it again and remove your tag if you agree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonprost (talk • contribs) 09:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

problems with Richard Gisser

Hi, I do not really see the issue with this article: It is (a) not an orphan as at least one other page points to it, there are (b) plenty of inline citations confirming its statements, and I even added a few more, and (c) when you note that it requires copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling I am personally hurt---please point out a single typo there! Please look into it one more time. I am quite sure that you’ll hear the “encyclopedic tone used on Misplaced Pages”. --93.83.156.94 (talk) 06:55, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I had forgotten to sign on before --WernR (talk) 07:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Ghost Motorcycles: I’m sorry but you are quite wrong in your assessment that this article is in any way promotional – Ghost is not a functioning business at this time and hasn’t been for many years – it is, as described, an iconic name from the past notable to the locale and to the biking industry (actually worldwide). The only reason was (is) is used in this text is because the original building and family still occupy the location. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.232.159.237 (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Argument from desire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mind-reading (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Be nice

This edit summary was not nice. Did you even read the rationale? There is consensus from an RfC to have only one article. The Kim Davis biography has survived two attempts at deletion by a large margin. This was nothing more than technical deletion. - MrX 16:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

When you and your clique are some of the most nasty and unreasonable editors that I've sever seen on this website, I find it rather startling that you could be this badly deluded and intellectually dishonest. I'm being nice. Far nicer than I'd like to be. Do you want me to not be nice? CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 16:34, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

I don't understand your attitude. Everyone else is following the processes for determining consensus for a content dispute. You seem to want everyone to acquiesce to you opinion, which is not how a collaborative project works. You can't override consensus by moving pages and ignoring the outcomes of two AfDs and multiple RfCs, no matter how strongly you feel about it. I'm sorry if that makes you want to lash out.- MrX 17:00, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

It's rather sad that you're engaging in complete psychological projection, given that you've assumed bad faith and acted in a terrible manner to begin with, to now suddenly play victim and act as if I've been committing some great sin because how dare I take an act that you oppose. It's even sadder given that I'm following the processes for determining consensus for a content dispute. It's people like you that utterly refuse to comment on talk pages with reason, hashing things out, and instead you just have to have it your own way and override the consensus when, as the RFD plainly stated, there's a majority viewpoint for a "Kim Davis _____ controversy/controversies" page.

Look, you can spew whatever bile you want on talk pages and engage in whatever obsessive edit warring on pages if you like (I'm not going to step in further in terms of article names), but if you want to toss some eggs on the wall of my talk page then just know that your next comment here will be your last. Any more bad faith personal attacks I'll just remove. Don't worry, though, since you and your guys are so obsessive about getting the last word then you can say what you want and I won't post underneath. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:09, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Kim Davis (county clerk). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:39, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

If you actually read the context, you see that they're attacking, and I'm responding. You've got it backwards. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

I read it. You have multiple comments that are direct personal attacks. Recommend you WP:DISENGAGE. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:42, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Regarding your revert, this is your final warning before an ANI. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:43, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Clearly, you either haven't read the context, or you have and you're just here on some kind of a harassment or something. I'd like to point out that I have a rather long history of constructively editing Misplaced Pages, and when people like those other editors believe that I'm nothing more than some kind of subhuman because that anyone that dares to object to breaking procedure and breaking consensus must be stopped.

Why is it so hard for there to just A)Be an RFC on the move issue, B)The RFC to go on, and C)The RFC to be finished? That's what I've always wanted. Consensus. Procedure. Why can't that happen? CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:45, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Going to note that I reverted. Here's why:

A)Labeling the article as a "psuedo-biography" is 100% fair comment on an article's quality. There's literally zero reasons to view that as any kind of libel, slander, or anything of the sort. Multiple other editors have said the same thing.

B)Asking for details as to why someone voted in an RFC when they go something like Keep, Oppose, etc and aren't going in depth is 100% fair comment. It's not hounding in any way. It's not uncivil in any way. That's normal. That's how normal discussions are done. I can't believe that you guys are living in this Alice in Wonderland world where asking for details is the same as an attack. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:51, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

The part I redacted, and you reverted, was calling other edits liars and "I'm not surprised that you want to keep pouring out viles of hate, foaming at the mouth, like you've done for days now, but it's getting tiresome". This is a personal attack. See WP:NPA. Your "pseudo-boigraphy" or request for details are not the issue here and were not redacted. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

That is factually incorrect. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:56, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:58, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

That is also, once again, factually incorrect. I am not moving pages. Nor am I engaging in attacks. Referring to an article as a "psuedo-biography", asking another user to clarify points in detail, and asking someone to revert their personal attacks upon me are not disruptive behaviors. Other users are making Misplaced Pages a battleground, and I would like them to stop. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 18:02, 6 October 2015 (UTC)