Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/NoCal100: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:26, 6 October 2015 editKingsindian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,374 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 03:09, 7 October 2015 edit undoCallanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators73,477 edits →06 October 2015: checkedNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:


===06 October 2015=== ===06 October 2015===
{{SPI case status|CUrequest}} {{SPI case status|}}


;Suspected sockpuppets ;Suspected sockpuppets
Line 23: Line 23:


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
*Firkin Flying Fox is {{inclusive}} due to the use of open proxy (and satellite) services. The user agent is different to two other socks I checked though. Moving to open queue for behavioural analysis. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 03:09, 7 October 2015 (UTC)



----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 03:09, 7 October 2015

NoCal100

NoCal100 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/NoCal100/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/NoCal100.



06 October 2015

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets


Looks like this user has been suspected of being NoCal100 earlier but was inconclusive. I am resubmitting this. Typical NoCal behaviour here, very reminiscient of All Rows4 here: long dormant account reactivated for taking sides with a new user against old editors on the "other side", like Nishidani and Zero. Earlier activity was similar, targeting Pluto2012's edits here. As an aside, HJ Mitchell, since the Brad Dyer case is dragging on, may I also suggest that this user be CU'd against them, in addition to the confirmed sock All Rows4? The behaviour is very similar to here. Kingsindian ♝♚ 21:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Categories: