| Revision as of 04:20, 3 February 2006 editWynler (talk | contribs)582 edits thoughts...← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:02, 23 November 2015 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,139,126 edits →ArbCom elections are now open!: new section | ||
| (23 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Ants - Subfamilia== | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691991546 --> | |||
| Added back the sub-family specifier. I'm working on compiling all the information I can find on this subfamily (man there's a lot of species). Having this tag on the taxobox helps me keep track. But I'll take it off if there is a consensus against it.] 17:32, 1 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] Thoughts == | |||
| :'Comment' Misplaced Pages is not ]. Period. End of discussion. We don't need to worry about offending people. The only debate to this image should be whether or not it has encyclopedic merit (should exist/be deleted) or if its legal/illegal in Florida. Then discuss whether or not it's the most important image for the article(placed at top). There are some other articles that I have some serious censorship issues with that I may or may not approach in the future. But for some reason, this one has just irked me. Why does everyone these days get so offended? Big deal. There are tons of religions offended by wikipedia articles. I don't come to wikipedia to feel good about myself. I come here to learn. I want uncensored, straight information. If uncensored information is against your religion, then you should not be part of the wikipedia community, as per ] ] 04:20, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:02, 23 November 2015
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)