| Revision as of 20:18, 19 April 2006 editHurricane Devon (talk | contribs)4,670 edits Re:Astronomical names← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:33, 23 November 2015 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,139,118 edits →ArbCom elections are now open!: new section | ||
| (90 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == ] == | |||
| ==Welcome== | |||
| Hey there, '''{{PAGENAME}}'''. ] to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for ]. I hope you enjoy being a ] and decide to stay! Here are a few good links for newcomers (or "oldcomers" for reference): | |||
| {| | |||
| | | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| | | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| |} | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| By the way, you should '''sign and date your comments''' on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Three tildes (~~~) produces just your name. If you have any questions, see the ], add a question to the ] or ask me on ]. Again, welcome! | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 --> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Great, just what we need around this place... more people whose names can spell "Ram Lakers". Dumb ]. :) Cheers. --]]] <sup><font color="#3D9140">]</font></sup> 19:53, 21 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Recent Deaths== | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 --> | |||
| Your arguments weren't bad at all, and you'd make an eloquent spokesperson for your view if the matter came to a vote. One thing I love about Misplaced Pages is that it defaults in favor of the inclusion of information, so while I would expect our positions to be split 50/50 in support, this would normally result in their being listed. Long before my time, this debate was had; besides my own views, another reason I oppose changing is the difficulty of revising the archives. | |||
| If it means anything, I do support the death penalty, though the way it is applied in Texas and Virginia scares me. I also support criminology, and think the dispassionate analysis of criminals is a useful social science; hence, I see their being cataloged at WP as a positive good. Best wishes, ] 22:40, 16 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you for your comments. I enjoy the debate and respect everyone's views on the issue. Revising the archives would be problematic, I agree.--] 16:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == DC streets == | |||
| An AfD that you recently particpated in has been recycled. Please see ]. - ]]] 05:34, 30 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Thank you! I suspect some yahoos are going to add it back in, but we can take turns reverting... ] 18:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Your turn? ] 16:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I will keep an eye on the article but I am not always in a position to act quickly I'm afraid.--] 19:53, 16 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Steelbeard1 hasn't been able to address the issues discussed in the talk pages. He has request a "truce," but his version of a truce is to leave the edits his way. ] 20:48, 16 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well, I'm not going to get involved in an edit war right now but I will revert it later or tomorrow probably. If he persists I may request comments on this and related issues. I will put up a message on his talk page as well.--] 21:04, 16 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Appreciation == | |||
| Thank you very much. I think we have very similar views, as I was just looking at some other comments you made on the olympic conventions page. Medalstats and Them medals seem to be not only expressing their views, but implimenting them as well, which is rude and rather sad. As long as we continue to bash our opponents outrageous views, I think we can draw in enough supporters to make for a "pro us" resolution of these debates. Keep up the good editing! --] <sup></font>]]</sup>/<sub></nowiki>]</font></sub> 23:40, 25 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Sockpuppets == | |||
| I would like to again bring to your attention the comment you left on the ] page. The three users: Medalstats, Them Medals, and Wintermedal, look quite suspicious of being the same person. Look at the user contribs of each one and note that each one is used on a specific date; Medalstats stops at the 24th, Them medals picks up on the 25th, and Winter medal is on the 26th. Look eerie to you too? If you're an admin, I suggest doing somjething about this, as I am not one myself. (I'd do it in a heartbeat.) Thanks. P.S. Notify me if you do anything. --] <sup></font>]]</sup>/<sub></nowiki>]</font></sub> 20:40, 27 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm not sure how you would do that. I'll see if I can find some way to report it and how bout you look for some evidence? --] <sup></font>]]</sup>/<sub></nowiki>]</font></sub> 20:49, 27 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ok, here's the template I should add to the user names: <nowiki>{{Sockpuppet|1=SOCKPUPPETEER|evidence=]}}</nowiki>. I will add it to all three of them if you think we have enough evidence. Thanks for the help. --] <sup></font>]]</sup>/<sub></nowiki>]</font></sub> 20:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ok I started adding them to the talk and main user pages. the link to where the evidence is to go is posted on the template. --] <sup></font>]]</sup>/<sub></nowiki>]</font></sub> 21:07, 27 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I'm going to look for an admin to address this to. So these users will be taken care of fast. --] <sup></font>]]</sup>/<sub></nowiki>]</font></sub> 21:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :That's quite alright. Thanks for your help. I appreciate it. --] <sup></font>]]</sup>/<sub></nowiki>]</font></sub> 22:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===More evidence=== | |||
| '''Them medals:''' | |||
| 03:55, February 25, 2006 (hist) (diff) Talk:Total Olympics medal count (support for medal count scores) | |||
| '''Wintermedal:''' | |||
| 16:48, February 26, 2006 (hist) (diff) Misplaced Pages:Olympic conventions/topics (support for medal count scores) | |||
| Note the exact same edit summary... | |||
| Something tells me there was someone before it, too, and I'll try to find out who it was. | |||
| == Re: Antics == | |||
| Thanks for the comment. That was a nice thing to say. Yeah, I've been trying to get rid of some of those "red links" too. TYhere's just so many you can do without getting bored, though. Haha. Anyway, I looked at your comment and I've decided that I will scratch the whole thing. Your logic is right and I want that page to turn out well. P.S. Yeah I contacted an admin who then blocked him. He was being very bothersome. haha, --] <sup></font>]]</sup>/<sub></nowiki>]</font></sub> 01:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Urgent! == | |||
| Kal, please go to ] ASAP, as the Olympic conventions pages have been nominated for deletion! I trust that you like them a lot and from your edits, you are not willing to lose all of the work you put in. I urge you to vote "Keep", as 3 weeks of work are about to go down the drain! Thanks. (and tell other active contributors.) --] <sup></font>]]</sup>/<sub></nowiki>]</font></sub> 20:33, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Olympic conventions debate == | |||
| Hi all! The debate on Olympic conventions has been moved and is now under the auspices of ]. We are now trying to decide what to do with all of the data that has been collected and start some sort of "governance". If you'd like to take part in this discussion, feel free to ] (the WikiProject talk page). We would appreciate your help! --]]] <sup></font>]]</sup>/<sub></nowiki>]</font></sub> 20:01, 17 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: AfD == | |||
| Hi Kalsermar. Thanks for alerting me. I too saw that on his user page and figured it would only be a matter of time before he made a page. Anyway, I voted delete (obviously). So did you hear anything about the sockpuppets of his? I just went to ] and looked in the archives and I didn't see anything about the heading I added for medalstats. That's weird that its gone. Oh well. He hasn't edited on any of the others recently, so whatever. Thanks, again. ] ]]] <sup style='margin-right:-20pt'>]<span class="plainlinks"><font color="silver"></font></span></sup> <sub>]</sub>  20:47, 30 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh, I guess I didn't see that. Well it doesn't matter anymore becuase he's not editing with those. ] ]]] <sup style='margin-right:-20pt'>]<span class="plainlinks"><font color="silver"></font></span></sup> <sub>]</sub>  20:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re:Astronomical names == | |||
| #That Messier 60 thing was an acident. | |||
| #That galaxy was named the ]!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | |||
| — '''<font color="green">]</font><font color="blue">]</font><font color="blue">]</font><font color="blue">]</font>''' @ 20:18, 19 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:33, 23 November 2015
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)