| Revision as of 15:05, 5 February 2013 editFordx12 (talk | contribs)648 edits →Suggestion regarding La Luz del Mundo content← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:23, 24 November 2015 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,451 edits →ArbCom elections are now open!: new section | ||
| (21 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Salutations, | |||
| :Please leave comments or questions below this line. For past discussions, please check this page's history. | |||
| ------------------------------------------------------------ | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| == Suggestion regarding La Luz del Mundo content == | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692225944 --> | |||
| RidjalA please state which specific current content in the article you are unhappy with (In a new section on the talk page). I know that you do not like the discrimination section because it goes against your POV that the Church is a massive financial institution that conspires with the Mexican Government and Mexican journalists to cause all sorts of mayhem. Perhaps we could open a discussion on the content in the Dispute Resolution? I believe that's the most civilized way, as opposed to accusing people and making personal attacks. You seemed content with my treatment of the history section, I don't see why that can't be replicated elsewhere. | |||
| Speaking of personal attacks, if you keep accusing me of being payed or otherwise compensated by any third party, or lumping me with Ajaxfiore, I am afraid that I will have to report you. I beleive that you have been warned before by other outside editors in the talk page and by myself on this issue multiple times. ] (]) 01:57, 5 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Hello Fordx12, hope you're well. I've made it clear in the talk page that I feel the discrimination section needs an overhaul. One recent editor wikinuevo was pretty vocal about some of those edits, too. He stated that the data distorts the NPOV in such a manner that it makes it seem as though the church is being slanderously targeted. But that's beyond the scope of our discussion, perhaps we can move this discussion back into the talk page like you suggested. | |||
| :I've been sharing my POV that I'm not convinced you guys have much interest in genuinely contributing to ''the improvement of the entirety'' of the article (you guys keep removing Erdely as a source, and anyone who knows about the church knows how much LLDM adherents and associates hate Erdely). I'm not saying that you and Ajaxfiore are terrible people, but you guys come off as instruments that the LLDM leadership is utilizing for improving their personal image: SJF already implements services from lawyers, television/media (Casa Cultural Berea), computer programmers, PR people, Incondicionales, and so many others to help improve and promote SJF's image after the turmoil from the scandals. I wouldn't doubt that someone was formally designated as a Wiki-editor as well by ''El Apostol de Dios''. I'm suspicious about some of your guy's data too, and where you're getting that data from as only those associated with the 'Apostol of God' would have any vetted interest and have the proper channels of providing the obscure data that you guys are providing to debase Erdely. | |||
| :BTW, have you noticed that the vandalization campaign against the article page has ceased for almost an entire year now? I wonder what made them call it off? I remember at one point we couldn't even go a week without the page being brutally vandalized. | |||
| :Many blessings, ] (]) 05:02, 5 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::I actually "sighed" when I read this. This wasn't an invitation for you to voice your conspiracy theories. I am sure this conspiracy is very real to you. You were told to drop this by other editors including administrators. Besides, you seem awfully defensive of Erdely when no one else seems to share this opinion of yours. Perhaps there's another conspiracy going on here? It's strange that Wikinuevo came out of no where and made edits that you'd agree with. Perhaps you're both related to Erdely somehow....You see how easy it is to accuse someone of being involved in a conspiracy? I think I'll prepare a DRN report and settle some of the content there. You'll be given the proper notice. ] (]) 15:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:23, 24 November 2015
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)