| Revision as of 18:24, 31 December 2015 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,225 edits →Edit warring at Seljuq dynasty: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:49, 31 December 2015 edit undoJavaddeniro (talk | contribs)27 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> The full report is at ]. It is natural to speculate that you <u>]</u> since you already know , doing so on your seventh edit. Anything you can do to persuade us of your good faith would be helpful. Thank you, ] (]) 18:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC) | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> The full report is at ]. It is natural to speculate that you <u>]</u> since you already know , doing so on your seventh edit. Anything you can do to persuade us of your good faith would be helpful. Thank you, ] (]) 18:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC) | ||
| {{unblock|reason=It's obviouslly clear from the trustworthy references the I have suggested The house of Seljuk has not been pure Turkic and the process of Persianization of them has been stated clearlly while the user kansas Bear is trying to make an edit war and is not answering the questions in the talk page and is asking wikipedia adminastration to block me that is obviouslly meaningless ] (]) 18:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)}} | |||
Revision as of 18:49, 31 December 2015
Warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:35, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Reported
Since you have chosen to edit war, see here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 03:42, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring at Seljuq dynasty
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The full report is at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Javaddeniro reported by User:Kansas Bear (Result: Blocked). It is natural to speculate that you might not be a new editor since you already know how to issue official warning messages, doing so on your seventh edit. Anything you can do to persuade us of your good faith would be helpful. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Javaddeniro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It's obviouslly clear from the trustworthy references the I have suggested The house of Seljuk has not been pure Turkic and the process of Persianization of them has been stated clearlly while the user kansas Bear is trying to make an edit war and is not answering the questions in the talk page and is asking wikipedia adminastration to block me that is obviouslly meaningless Javaddeniro (talk) 18:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=It's obviouslly clear from the trustworthy references the I have suggested The house of Seljuk has not been pure Turkic and the process of Persianization of them has been stated clearlly while the user kansas Bear is trying to make an edit war and is not answering the questions in the talk page and is asking wikipedia adminastration to block me that is obviouslly meaningless ] (]) 18:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=It's obviouslly clear from the trustworthy references the I have suggested The house of Seljuk has not been pure Turkic and the process of Persianization of them has been stated clearlly while the user kansas Bear is trying to make an edit war and is not answering the questions in the talk page and is asking wikipedia adminastration to block me that is obviouslly meaningless ] (]) 18:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=It's obviouslly clear from the trustworthy references the I have suggested The house of Seljuk has not been pure Turkic and the process of Persianization of them has been stated clearlly while the user kansas Bear is trying to make an edit war and is not answering the questions in the talk page and is asking wikipedia adminastration to block me that is obviouslly meaningless ] (]) 18:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}