Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:48, 6 January 2016

Speedy deletion declined: Krishnahari Baral

Hello SupernovaeIA. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Krishnahari Baral, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 16:17, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, But you see the referenes are almost non existent and this article has been created and most of the material added by the person himself and/or his relatives. Should i propose for deletion instead?SupernovaeIA (talk) 19:41, 26 August 2013 (UTC) Here is a valid proof that this article is an advertising stunt: http://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Picture_of_Swapnil_Baral.png The user laysforme is the person's son who has contributed totallly to this article. He created his own page which was recently deleted too. Please let me know if proposing for deletion is a good idea? The references is the peron's website itself!!SupernovaeIA (talk) 20:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Removal of content at Shiva

Hi, Please discuss the material at talk page. Talk:Shiva Rahul Jain (talk) 12:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Shiva, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Regarding Removal of comments Redtigerxyz 15:07, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Never removed anything from the talk. what are you talking about? check the talk history!SupernovaeIA (talk) 10:57, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Already linked earlier. See . --Redtigerxyz 12:18, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Krishnahari Baral

Please do not add PROD templates to articles being discussed at AFD, they are not eligible. If you cannot use Twinkle properly then you shoul not use it at all. GiantSnowman 12:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making disruptive/unnecessary edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at FC Barcelona. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

Kindly ensure that you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive and/or unnecessary. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justkartik10 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Removal of content from José Mourinho

Please discuss and reach a consensus before removing huge amount of text from an article. You've already been asked to do this before. Mosmof (talk) 17:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

The section was already tagged with the content being compromised with neutrality for the article. Please refrain from vandalizing my page! SupernovaeIA (talk) 20:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Likewise with this edit to a different article. This is a collaborative project, and if you're going to remove sourced content, you should at least give a reason with the edit summary. Adrian J. Hunter 13:48, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to José Mourinho, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to José Mourinho. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Mattythewhite (talk) 09:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

It is fully sourced in the article itself. Every single clubs page can be deleted if that content is not unverifiable. SupernovaeIA (talk) 09:30, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Please provide the source for reverting my edit.

My Edit on the 2014–15 La Liga was based on two sources provided. Please refrain from unsourced edits or please provide the correct source. KAS 20:11, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

The source is todays' game.. Stop putting outdated stats.!

Please refrain from adding unsourced contents. Please understand carefuly about unsourced contents. KAS 20:21, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

These are the two sources that I have used in my edits, please check the validity of your edits.Source: espnfc.com, worldfootball.com. Please add your signature at the end of the your comment. KAS 20:24, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm David Eppstein. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to African immigration to the United States because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —David Eppstein (talk) 20:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

--Suitcivil133 (talk) 19:11, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

http://www.rsssf.com/tabless/spansupcuphist.html and RFEF's official page http://www.rfef.es/noticias/supercopa/conoce-antecedentes-supercopa)

--- Nowhere it says copa argentina is official trophy! SupernovaeIA (talk) 18:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Reason

@SupernovaeIA:Reason for this revert.--Vin09 (talk) 18:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at 2014–15 Chelsea F.C. season, you may be blocked from editing. QED237 (talk) 23:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at 2014–15 Chelsea F.C. season. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. QED237 (talk) 21:15, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Misplaced Pages, as you did at 2014–15 Chelsea F.C. season. QED237 (talk) 21:23, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

3RR

Hi, you need to learn the rules. You have been inserting factual errors not supported by source, and has done so 4 times so you are the one who has been braking the guidelines. I have also explained the situation to you. It is MATCHDAYS (and not rounds) per consensus, so we list position after they have played their match, just like the source does. If they dont play for next 5 weeks, they can be passed by other teams and not be 1st after their 28th match. Please follow sources. QED237 (talk) 22:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

June 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 12:11, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Football records in Spain

I suggest you to do your reverts manually because when you undo this page you did not consider other people edits, and you revert everything!--Alexiulian25 (talk) 23:39, 24 December 2015 (UTC) -- Done. Thanks! SupernovaeIA (talk) 17:38, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016

Your recent editing history at Football records in Spain shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:55, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

If you notice, User: Suitcivil broke many of these rules a long time ago. Maybe you should have stopped him from reverting! SupernovaeIA (talk) 21:12, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Stop wasting my time troll.

Stop wasting my time troll. You are not a moderator nor do I take your attempts to appear like one seriously. You are wasting your time.

Nor will you succeed with deleting sourced material or omitting historical facts.

--Suitcivil133 (talk) 21:48, 6 January 2016 (UTC)