Misplaced Pages

User talk:EauZenCashHaveIt: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:44, 12 January 2016 editEauZenCashHaveIt (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,582 edits January 2016← Previous edit Revision as of 12:54, 12 January 2016 edit undoWoodensuperman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers87,094 edits January 2016Next edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose ]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] (]) 12:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC) If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose ]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] (]) 12:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
:{{ping|Robsinden}} ] (]) 12:44, 12 January 2016 (UTC) :{{ping|Robsinden}} ] (]) 12:44, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
::If you correctly followed the ] process and didn't ignore other editors or consensus, there wouldn't be the necessity to revert you. --] (]) 12:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:54, 12 January 2016

The River and Neflix original programming

If The River should be added to Template:Netflix then all of the shows listed in the tables List of original programs distributed by Netflix#Exclusive US distribution shows, List of original programs distributed by Netflix#Exclusive UK Distribution Shows and List of original programs distributed by Netflix#Exclusive Canadian Distribution Shows should be. BBC One in the UK is the original network for The River, as that is the network to first show it. You would not, I assume, argue that The 100 (TV series) should be added to the "Netflix original programming" table because Netflix is the original broadcaster in Canada. That is because The CW is the original broadcaster of it in it's country of origin. It is the same with the River because BBC One is the original broadcaster in that show's country of origin. How can The River be a Netflix Original when it aired elsewhere a month before it was added to Netflix? 12bigbrother12 (talk) 19:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

@12bigbrother12: I replied on the article talk page. EauZenCashHaveIt (I'm All Ears) 03:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Template:Netflix. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

@Robsinden: EauZenCashHaveIt (I'm All Ears) 12:44, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
If you correctly followed the WP:BRD process and didn't ignore other editors or consensus, there wouldn't be the necessity to revert you. --Rob Sinden (talk) 12:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)