Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:31, 28 January 2016

Going forward

As you may have seen, I did the work of opening an SPI and providing evidence. Several socks are now blocked. If you suspect socks of the same editor have appeared again, please post to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Spliff Joint Blunt (with evidence). If you are unsure how to format your report, post to my talk page (again, with specific evidence) and I will handle it. --NeilN 15:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

for the love of god thank you--68.231.26.111 (talk) 15:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your talk page additions

Adding this to talk pages, implying that I have blocked the IP or have determined it's a sock, is not good. Please do not do that again. If you think an IP is block evading, you can add {{subst:uw-socksuspect|Spliff Joint Blunt}} and provide evidence on the SPI case page. Also, please read over User_talk:NeilN#does_an_indefititely_blocked_editor_have_the_right_to_post_on_user_pages and respond if you wish. --NeilN 00:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Supergirl (U.S. TV series). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Alex|The|Whovian 10:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

dude you just attacked me and called me a plaguirist!!!--68.231.26.111 (talk) 10:55, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

That's not an attack. Continue the conversation on my talk page (which is where you took it). Alex|The|Whovian 10:56, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Here you go. Under "Recap – Prev Episode". Perfectly matches what's on Misplaced Pages - proof it has been copied to here. Alex|The|Whovian 11:40, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

dude is that all you have for evidence!!! the webpage you quote is just a sniffer it finds thing already written and just becomes a file cabinet for them - you need to show a citation - a thing SIGNED by some author!!!--68.231.26.111 (talk) 11:45, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

You need proof that you created it. If it's found on another website, it's reverted. It's really as easy as that. Alex|The|Whovian 11:46, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

again dude are you brain dead the webpage you show is just a sniffer - it runs around the internet and just copies stuff - i am sure it has billions for wiki lines it has stolen!!!

None of this you can prove. Alex|The|Whovian 11:49, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Neutral party here, i'm with the IP on this one, see their synopsis for ep6 before they changed it..its not always necessary that things were copied from other sites, its also possible others sites copy stuff from wikipedia; infact, its more likely and quite prevalent..--Stemoc 12:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

One simply needs to Google the summary to see that it is on multiple sites. Do you have a cache for each of them? Alex|The|Whovian 12:05, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

It's definitely on multiple sites with no clear indication of where it originally came from but, since it wasn't originally from this site, we have to treat it as a copyright violation. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:08, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

have you see how the edits were made by the IP? It was not a single edit, but multiple ones within minutes such as this, 20 mins later, 5 mins later which collaborates with the link provided above and then over 5 hours later, the IP makes changes which the site mentioned above uses as a prequel option in their next episode..as i said, its the other way around, they are copying US.--Stemoc 12:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 03:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages: Administrators; notice Board/Edit war

You can't post. Over and above your block, the page is now protected. (cur | prev) 17:29, 6 December 2015‎ Ymblanter (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (126,652 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Changed protection level of Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Persistent sock puppetry ( (expires 05:29, 7 December 2015 (UTC)) (indefinite))) (undo | thank) 7&6=thirteen (☎) 03:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

i couldnt even defend myself - how fair is that!--68.231.26.111 (talk) 03:21, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

wiki proves again - whole thing is absolutely pointless - please explain to me in terms even a 3-year-old can understand how it happens that the other guy is also not looking at the same block - he posted 7 reverts himself!!! all i ever see here is warrior assistance, sock puppet assistance, bias assistance, people that dont have the slightess clue what they are sayijng getting assistance --68.231.26.111 (talk) 03:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

• 1. 3RR
  2. Blanking your talk page when others tried to communicate with you
  3. this personal attack
      — Berean Hunter (talk) 04:03, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Some words

Look, I think you're a net positive to Misplaced Pages but not if you set the attackmeter to 11 every time someone reverts you or questions your edits. If that happens, you'll probably be treated like most IPs who disrupt or vandalize. So, question for you - assuming that you get reverted in the future (and it's going to happen), how can we stop the situation from quickly deteriorating into a battlefield? --NeilN 04:23, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your edits

The New York Times is a notable source for coverage, the current events section is not an article so policy regarding articles wouldn't apply. Like it, don't like it the Brussels comments received coverage from reliable sources. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)