Revision as of 01:37, 21 January 2016 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,385 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:Miscellany for deletion/Archive 9) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:28, 5 February 2016 edit undoSmokeyJoe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers44,345 edits →Why the hell is Ricky relisting MfD discussions.: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
{{resolved}} | {{resolved}} | ||
:There were some bad closing templates placed by ] when doing some ] closures; I think I got them all removed. — ] <sup>]</sup> 04:17, 20 January 2016 (UTC) | :There were some bad closing templates placed by ] when doing some ] closures; I think I got them all removed. — ] <sup>]</sup> 04:17, 20 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Why the hell is Ricky relisting MfD discussions. == | |||
They were down the bottom where they belong, where they have already been reviewed as a waste of time and passed over. Taking a Jan 26 nomination and putting it up in the Feb 05 nominations only stuffs up the reviewing process. It will cause new nominations, which might be important, to be lost with the old. | |||
Please stop it. | |||
--] (]) 11:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:28, 5 February 2016
On February 2011, it was proposed that this page be moved from Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion to Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for discussion. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Trouble
I'm having some trouble with some pages I nominated. I placed {{mfd|Rayrayzone}} on several userpages of a blocked user (Rayrayzone), and clicked "this page's entry" to start the discussion, but something went very wrong, and now the discussion page looks like this. Can anyone help sort it out? Thanks, Azealia911 talk 10:14, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Azealia911: Sorry for the late reply; it seems that no one watches this page. Simply by adding the tags to the pages, you cannot expect the discussion page to automatically list all the nominated pages. For that, you have to manually produce the list in the
:{{pagelinks|Name of page with namespace}}
format (one on each line). In addition, the MfD discussion should habe taken place at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rayrayzone since it was a userpage you were nominating (and hence the tags to be placed on the pages should have been {{mfd|User:Rayrayzone}}) 103.6.159.76 (talk) 19:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Ancient half-finished MFD
ResolvedI'm not an MFD-regular and I don't really know the processes around this stuff, so perhaps someone here can tell me what to do. I came across this weird page earlier, which has an MFD on it from September last year, with one vote from two days later and another from six months afterwards. Six months after that, the MFD tag is still on the page and, as far as I can tell, it has never been posted. Should the tag be deleted, or should it be listed here properly? Thanks for your advice. Relentlessly (talk) 17:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- I have just transcluded it. 103.6.159.75 (talk) 15:29, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Close please?
ResolvedAn MFD on a userpage that has run for about two weeks. Vote's are running about 14-4 at the moment and it's acrimonious. Thanks.Dan Murphy (talk) 17:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- Discussion is ongoing. This normally would suggest not closing. However, given the result is unlikely to change with continued discussion and it's been acrimonious all along and there is no hint that this will change, cutting off discussion mid-stream may be in the best interest of the encyclopedia. But to whatever admin closes this, be prepared for push-back. Disclaimer: I participated in the discussion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- And it has now been closed. 103.6.159.75 (talk) 15:30, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Fantasy Reality Shows?
Does anyone have any insight in to the trend of "new" primarily single purpose users with fully formatted fantasy reality show tables as their only contributions? What are these being used for? I'd assume some sort of wagering, but not sure how. — xaosflux 17:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Current MfD discussions not showing if earlier than the 18th
I am not seeing any of the pre- Jan 18th MfD discussions at WP:MFD. They are generally unclosed. I can't work out why. I can't see that it is Legobot. I see the same thing using different browsers, different devices, and different service providers. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Resolved- There were some bad closing templates placed by SwisterTwister when doing some NAC closures; I think I got them all removed. — xaosflux 04:17, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Why the hell is Ricky relisting MfD discussions.
They were down the bottom where they belong, where they have already been reviewed as a waste of time and passed over. Taking a Jan 26 nomination and putting it up in the Feb 05 nominations only stuffs up the reviewing process. It will cause new nominations, which might be important, to be lost with the old.
Please stop it.