Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:18, 10 February 2016

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Possible compromised account. Thank you. clpo13_(talk) 17:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

• Not a compromised account, just another user who's gotten tired of being harassed by vandals and socks... Thomas.W 17:32, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Upp med hakan

Ta "ledigt" ett tag, men kom sedan tillbaka igen, det fungerar för mig. Vi kan inte låta knäppskallarna vinna... Thomas.W 17:32, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Perhaps this will help. Regards,

220 of 18:11, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Userpage protected

The extensive history of vandalism to your userpage, including recent vandalism by multiple people, has prompted me to semiprotect it indefinitely. If you disagree, let me know or leave a note at WP:RFPP asking for unprotection; I can't imagine an admin rejecting such a request. Nyttend (talk) 21:50, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Presskr,Inc

I suspect sockpuppetry, but in absence of evidence to confirm it the speedy tag I placed on this article was legitimately contested. I'll remove the speedy nomination again, but later today will raise an AfD and SPI investigation. RichardOSmith (talk) 17:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

FYI - Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Presskr,Inc and Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Legacy2015. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Hadmatiya JN.

Cleanup? Xx236 (talk) 11:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Yes? My edit involved copyediting, removing language errors, and moving the relevant information from the rather clunky and ill-formatted table to the article text itself. --bonadea contributions talk 11:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Is one short unsourced line "an article"?Xx236 (talk) 11:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC) I assume that JN mean Junction, but it should be explained.Xx236 (talk) 07:05, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Please continue writing this controversial stub.Xx236 (talk) 08:29, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Article editing

Article editing must be done to improve an article and not to kill it . I found you have made several editing in an article Kimberly Jesika i created removed links and made many edits. Do you think its ethical for you to do it ? why are you always against my edits ? I feel so low :(

Always :) (talk) 19:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

I was trying to save the article, because it was bloated with too many references - a couple of them were the exact same article published in two different sources and several of the others were trivial or unrteliable sources. This was all explained in detail in the edit summaries. You have been blocked for using a lot of sockpuppets so you probably won't see this, but for the record, I see absolutely no ethical problem with improving articles. --bonadea contributions talk 12:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Christmas Wishes

Christmas wishes Always :) (talk) 15:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

why reverted my edits in "Physical exercise".

hi.. uve just reverted my edits in "Physical exercise". i wud like to know the reason for it. i do think that an imp. article like it needs a gallery.

As a matter of fact I didn't revert it, because somebody else got in before me (I didn't notice that, which is why I posted the warning on your talk page). A gallery of very similar images does not add anything to an article - most of the images you added were of people in the US military, and all of them were Western people doing the same kind of fitness exercises. Besides, the division into women and men seems uncalled for (though that could be fixed easily enough in itself.) No article "needs" an image gallery, although images can often improve an article - however, again, having lots of images of what is essentially the same thing is not that useful. As I mentioned on your user talk page, the best place to discuss this is on the article's talk page. Thanks, --bonadea contributions talk 12:28, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Sales revision edits.

Hello I'm new to updating articles and I wanted to know why you reversed my edits in 'sales' so I can improve my edits. Thanks. User talk Amcquade

Disturbing

Whatever your name is why don't you just let me be. I've been noticing from the way you revert my edits recently that you seem to keep me in mind for no reason. I work diligently to verify my facts and all I get is a revert which I can't just understand. The worse you'd do is to block me which I'd gladly accept as I need time for my acadics also no thanks Mahveotm (talk) 02:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Mahveotm (talk) 02:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

I started replying to this, and then I noticed that the editor has been blocked as a sockmaster so I don't think I'll waste my time on it. Violating NPOV is one thing, and it's an easy mistake to make as a new editor (harder to explain away when it's done for the third time after explanations have been provided, but never mind) but if somebody doesn't understand that actively pretending to be several different people and posting misleading information to discussions is against Misplaced Pages rules, then maybe editing Misplaced Pages is not the best hobby for them. --bonadea contributions talk 11:02, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Procedural closes at WP:AfD

Hello Bonadea. I just wanted to let you know that I have NAC procedurally closed two AfD's that you opened: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Uroosa Qureshi and Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Hiba Ali. It turns that both were the creations of a ban-evading sock, and so were speedily deleted under WP:G5 by Admin Sphilbrick. Just letting you know as a courtesy. Thanks! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

hi, can you pls not to delete my wiki article ikeymonitor ? I want to keep it as we can see some similar articles like mSpy Mobile Spy are listed without problem. And things are different as more notable sources added. Wendysms (talk) 03:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

discuss

	need to discuss
	hi, can you pls add my skype aobosp or tell me your skype so we can discuss more?　we really want to keep our article. Wendysms (talk) 03:57, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Replaied on your talk page. --bonadea contributions talk 15:43, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

External links

Thank you for your kind, polite and knowledgeable response. Bonadea, I appreciate your reply. But I am not trying to advertise, I am not affiliated with any other website also, but what I found to be added to the article, I added it. But I still feel that the image is important to added for more understanding of the visitors.

Bonadea, as you might know that "Picture speaks more than Thousand Words", So I try to contribute the image which I found suitable and understandable. Still, I feel that the image should be included in the article. But if you don't won't, I still appreciate and remain contributing to further articles. Thank you once again...— Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterwoodwilson (talk • contribs)

Thank you for your kind and courteous reply. Misplaced Pages can sometimes seem like a jungle of rules which might appear to be a bit arbitrary. When it comes to adding external links, the relevant guideline/policy is here, with a handy list of the kind of links that is generally not allowed here. The image you added in this edit has an inappropriate external link in the image itself, and there was also a link in the descriptive text. It doesn't matter whether you are personally affiliated with the website or not - the URL cannot be added to Misplaced Pages articles as it violates several of the points in the list linked above. Hope that explains matters somewhat. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 15:43, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Bonadea. I am delighted to here from you. Thank you advising me about the article writing. one thing, if you can help me then please tell me how I can whitelist a website from where I am taking the content and putting it in the citation. Kindly help me. Regards, --Peterwoodwilson (talk) 18:20, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Peter

Thank you once again bonadea for your help. I would like to know how can I whitelist a website. Please help me.

You seem to have found the page to post your request - you are unlikely to get the request granted as it is not an appropriate link to add and it has been spammed quite a bit, but it is not my call to make. In any case, please stop posting links that violate the external links policy. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 19:01, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

@Bonadea : ok bonadea. I understood now. Thanks for your information, now I will not contribute here anymore, even will not donate as I decided first. I will go to other website for it. thank you for all your support and respect.

Deletions

Regarding Rahul khismatrao, the author has also created The Theory of Creator (Book), which I've tagged for deletion as well.— TAnthony 17:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Doris Torres

I declined your speedy deletion under A7, as I believe that being a news anchor for notable is a credible claim of significance. However, since it doesn't have any reliable sources currently, I've BLPPRODded it. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

(General note: Adding spam links on Comparison shopping website.)

Hi

I will keep this conversation very short and crisp. I know that I am a new contributor in wiki and hence you are far superior than me, when to comes to wiki policy and guidelines.

I could see that, you have removed the entire update that i have put on the above mentioned topic, not just a few links. Then you mentioned that you have removed one or more external links, as they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia and your subject line says "Adding spam links on Comparison shopping website".

Please let me know, you criteria for self declaring, some relevant links as spams ?

As you have a quite deep expertise in wiki, as contributor and moderator, similarly I do have deep ( may be deeper) expertise, in comparison shopping engine concept, as i have spent around 10 years on this field and i know very well, that all the external links, that i have provided are valid and upto date. Please let me know the grounds against which you have blindly declared this update as spam ??

• I agree with Bonadea that the text was promotional (as well as poorly written), seeming to plug something called AWK Solutions. Drmies (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Drmies

Thanks for your clear communication. Yes, it is true that i have added the name of the company AWK Solutions, but that was not for plugging in something. Infact, in the first instance, i haven't included the company name, as i have read and studied their articles on many publisher sites. Just to make the update more appropriate, I included, the company name, as i saw similar company name reference at various part of the topic ( e.g pricegrabber.com, trade doubler, etc). It is absolutely fine if i have to remove the company name.

let me know, if i can still submit the update or not.

Hi Bonadea

Thank you for letting me know about the deletion. I am new to editing in Misplaced Pages and I am wondering if may you have any suggestions about how I may change the content of the source referenced?

Thanks again Mrchet12 (talk) 18:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Superbowl

Thank you for removing Superbowl entries from year articles. (I only noticed it because 2003 was missed.) Technically, though, WP:RY only applies to 2002 a later. There was a separate consensus at WT:YEARS that Superbowls (and possibly other annual sports) are not to be listed unless otherwise notable. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 13:08, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Oh, okay. Thank you for letting me know! --bonadea contributions talk 13:10, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Photo booth edit

Hi,

you removed a modern photo booth source i had under the photo booth wikipedia article.. How can I fix this so it can be posted?

This was not posted in error I wanted to reference a modern photo booth something that was not shown to our users in any of the photos.

thanks so much!

Photo booth edit

Hi,

you removed a modern photo booth source i had under the photo booth wikipedia article.. How can I fix this so it can be posted?

This was not posted in error I wanted to reference a modern photo booth something that was not shown to our users in any of the photos.

thanks so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gimjom (talk • contribs) 20:38, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

edit deleted

you called my edit 'personal analysis', it's not true . i have given references. Pls check if for yourself. How do you allow people to post such pages in the first place...look at what the person who created the page had written . You have no problem with that ??? ..please read the new paper articles on Rohith. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jithmatt (talk • contribs) 21:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

deleted edit

thank you for all the help ! and thank you being understanding.These are tough times for Indian Academia.

copy right violation

can you tell me where exactly is the copyright violation ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jithmatt (talk • contribs) 09:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Bonadea

Hi there I have just created an account on wikipedia and made some edits under cuckold and hotwife , a few days ago. They were taken down because I did not include the correct referencing format. I read up on how to include the proper citation and then made the edits again yesterday and included the book reference using what I believe is the correct citation system following the one already in exsistence on the entry. You have removed my edits ( i think ), can I ask why ?, as I do not want to get into one of these edit wars. If I am doing something incorrectly I would rather know why. .The book reference I had included is not by an eroric author, it is not fiction, it is a work about the psychology of erotic personality types.Hope to hear from you so we can resolve this

Thanks Earlymanbc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Earlymanbc (talk • contribs) 12:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for protecting

Caballero/Historiador has given you a WikiCake! WikiCakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

This here was very nice of you.

Spread the tastiness of cakes by adding {{subst:GiveCake}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Crap

Oh man, I'm so sorry about reverting your edits, here. My page jumped when I clicked, and I clicked on rollback. Boomer Vial 08:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

No worries :-) I suspected that was it. It has happened to me, too. Cheers, --bonadea contributions talk 08:22, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Need Help

Hi Bonadea, I am trying to update my chairman current designation, here is the page Kushagra Bajaj and official web url . What document or url you need so that i can update the correct information. User talk:Pankaj.kumar89 —Preceding undated comment added 07:09, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

You cannot copy text straight from the source - that is a copyright violation. It is also not appropriate to add all that text about who the person's grandfather is in the first sentence, unless the grandparent is the reason the person is notable (as might for instance be the case for a royal baby). An encyclopedia article is different from a promotional biography such as an official company page. I also note that you say "my chairman". Misplaced Pages requires that all editors disclose any external affiliations they have with the subject of pages they are editing. There is more info on your talk page. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 07:43, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Bonadea Sir

Respected sir ,I need your help about the article sreehari, in september 2015 dr sreehari created world record and his name was entered in Guinness book of world records in medicine , especially in anesthesia . He is the first person in the world induced anesthesia in 250 persons at a time .This news was published in many Indian news papers ( top newspaper in India Hindu , and Deccan chronicle) , and many other newspapers in world.I think this record is notable .Because this experiment will help many doctors to save life of patients ,especially who may get anaphylectic reaction with anesthetics.i am requesting you very much for this help...Dr Priyaka MD ,INDIA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kumarikumari100 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Short answer: No. Longer answer: Articles about Dr Srihari / Sreehari have been deleted several times. Y. Srihari was deleted after a deletion discussion and such articles cannot be recreated; if new information had emerged since the discussion was closed, you could talk to the deleting administrator about it. I'll save you the waste of your time, though: dr Sreehari, or Srihari, is still not notable according to Misplaced Pages's definition, and this was very obvious from the most recent incarnation of the article, Sreehari. Even if he had a Guinness World Record, that would not be sufficient in itself; it's very interesting to note that the official website for Guinness Book of Records, where all records are searchable, don't mention this alleged world record anywhere. But that's beside the point. It is true that a brief notice of the event where he used hypnosis on a large number of people was reported in The Hindu ; unfortunately, the fact that a few other sources reprinted that notice does not mean that it was covered by multiple sources (it's still the exact same text). Misplaced Pages cannot be used to argue in favour of a cause, and it absolutely cannot be used to report on experiments in order to make the results of the experiment more widely known. One doctor's personal opinion of what might be medically advantageous is not encyclopedic information.

If this wasn't sufficient, the fact that there has been a , who have disrupted Misplaced Pages by inserting this person's name into various articles, makes this a subject that will definitely be deleted very speedily on sight. Please stop wasting your own time and that of other Misplaced Pages editors, by not attempting to add any information about this person again. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 18:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

y.srihari is different persons article , sreehari is different persons article, please verify the reference list of both articles , one importent matter is editor Bonadea is enemy to both of articles,this editor nominating deletion for sreehari article,because lot of argument happend in Bonadea talk page, this editor deleting the matter from Bonadea talk page , please verify the argument happend in Bonadea talk page,bonada removing the text what ever againest, please study all conversion, other editors arguement with Bonadea about the articles belongs to sreehari , y.sreehari article is different from all other articles of sreehari, we dont know who is y.srihari ,after deleting the page sreehari , i created the page drsrihari(acotor),it was nominated for deletion by editor, and withdral this praposal, then immediatly this Bonadea agiain add nomination for deletion for this artical, after withdraw deletion praposal, immedialy this Bonadea add praposed for deletion, what is this reason,Bonadea wantedly praposing deletion for sreehari releted articles. Allready sreehari article was deleted,wikipidia policies not accepted to recreated the same article with out permission,so i kept request for recreation of article sreehari, with the administrato permission i recreated this sreehari article, this timi also the Bonadea praposed for speedy deletion, one this i can say y.srihari is diffent article,we dont know who is y.srihari and his article, One importent thing please verify the articles of drsrihari(actotor) references and sreehari article references ,there is no the letter *y* in any where even in news papers or indias world record book link, or photography of film wallposter.So Bonadea wantedly using this false y.srihari artical to damage the notability of dr sreehari, she dont like to keep dr sreehari articles in wikipedia ,because it may be personal.