Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Luke Nash-Jones: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:26, 4 March 2016 editJonadabsmith (talk | contribs)143 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:41, 4 March 2016 edit undoJonadabsmith (talk | contribs)143 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 19: Line 19:
Bondegezou, having admitted your political position, you are not in any neutral position to judge this article. If you want to just improve the quality of Misplaced Pages posts, you would co-operate with my suggestion to clean up and not delete the page. Instead you analyse Misplaced Pages submission guidelines to try and find an excuse to delete the page, and hence are driven by political motives. Even half what you said about it is nonsense; it has more references than you imply and than other pages you don't complain about. Rather than trying to delete pages with political ideas you disagree with, you should hit the streets and try to convince people of your ideas. Implying the Student Union is biased in favour of Brexit is ludicrous when rather it is the opposite, as are most university lecturers, of which you claim to be one. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> Bondegezou, having admitted your political position, you are not in any neutral position to judge this article. If you want to just improve the quality of Misplaced Pages posts, you would co-operate with my suggestion to clean up and not delete the page. Instead you analyse Misplaced Pages submission guidelines to try and find an excuse to delete the page, and hence are driven by political motives. Even half what you said about it is nonsense; it has more references than you imply and than other pages you don't complain about. Rather than trying to delete pages with political ideas you disagree with, you should hit the streets and try to convince people of your ideas. Implying the Student Union is biased in favour of Brexit is ludicrous when rather it is the opposite, as are most university lecturers, of which you claim to be one. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


], regards your reminders to all of the ] guidelines, the account ] which support you appears not only to be fake but to have been deleted multiple times, calling into question the reliability of those supporting your harassment of those with other political views. ], regards your reminders to all of the ] guidelines, the account ] which support you appears not only to be fake but to have been deleted multiple times, calling into question the reliability of those supporting your harassment of those with other political views. It is clear that Dr Henry Potts of UCL is furious that a Brexit movement has started on his beloved left-wing campus and is trying to "no platform" it rather than support democracy and liberty that he claims are his ideals. As a lecturer, he should encourage learning and ideas, rather than silencing those he doesn't personally agree with. He should help students to express themselves, suggesting to improve articles but not seeking childishly to delete them.

Revision as of 17:41, 4 March 2016

Luke Nash-Jones

Luke Nash-Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails general notability guidelines. The only reliable source reference in the article does not mention Mr Luke Nash-Jones at all. Everything else is social media or self-publicity. Bondegezou (talk) 14:21, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Such is totally untrue - the references feature BirkbeckTories and LondonUniBrexit websites, as well as YouTube clips of News reports from French and Swiss TV featuring Nash-Jones — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonadabsmith (talkcontribs) 15:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete. Lists, passing references and about 20 seconds of "man on the street" appearances on TV. Nothing approaching the in-depth third party coverage required to meet WP:BIO. JohnInDC (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Considering that Bondegezou supports the Liberal Democrats who are opposed to Brexit, I would suggest there is clear bias in his call to delete this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonadabsmith (talkcontribs) 15:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment There are currently 13 references in the article. All apart from (9) and (13) appear to fail WP:RS: they are primary sources, or social media accounts (Facebook, YouTube) connected to the individual. (13) does not mention Nash-Jones at all. (9) is a students union website with unclear editorial policy; it's an article by Nash-Jones, so I don't think this can be said to meet RS either. The YouTube clips are all on a YouTube account connected to Nash-Jones; I can't verify their use by French or Swiss TV. One is under a minute long, one about a minute and the half. A brief appearance on TV does not constitute "significant coverage" about the subject under WP:GNG. I do personally support the Liberal Democrats, but would remind Jonadabsmith of WP:AGF. Bondegezou (talk) 15:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

You admit you support the LibDems who are opposed to Brexit, and thus you naturally, good faith or not, would want this page removed. Those clips did appear on French and Swiss TV, and the French TV clip is not a mere man in the street comment but an interview - the YouTube account is not held by Luke Nash-Jones and the videos are not his but clearly from media outlets. Luke Nash-Jones is not editor of the student union website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonadabsmith (talkcontribs) 15:48, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Bondegezou, having admitted your political position, you are not in any neutral position to judge this article. If you want to just improve the quality of Misplaced Pages posts, you would co-operate with my suggestion to clean up and not delete the page. Instead you analyse Misplaced Pages submission guidelines to try and find an excuse to delete the page, and hence are driven by political motives. Even half what you said about it is nonsense; it has more references than you imply and than other pages you don't complain about. Rather than trying to delete pages with political ideas you disagree with, you should hit the streets and try to convince people of your ideas. Implying the Student Union is biased in favour of Brexit is ludicrous when rather it is the opposite, as are most university lecturers, of which you claim to be one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonadabsmith (talkcontribs) 17:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Bondegezou, regards your reminders to all of the canvassing guidelines, the account JohnInDC which support you appears not only to be fake but to have been deleted multiple times, calling into question the reliability of those supporting your harassment of those with other political views. It is clear that Dr Henry Potts of UCL is furious that a Brexit movement has started on his beloved left-wing campus and is trying to "no platform" it rather than support democracy and liberty that he claims are his ideals. As a lecturer, he should encourage learning and ideas, rather than silencing those he doesn't personally agree with. He should help students to express themselves, suggesting to improve articles but not seeking childishly to delete them.

Categories: