Misplaced Pages

User talk:DelusionMBT: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:10, 28 March 2016 editDelusionMBT (talk | contribs)73 edits →How can I go to the SPI to accept all of my sockpuppets?← Previous edit Revision as of 18:18, 28 March 2016 edit undoSheriffIsInTown (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,514 edits →How can I go to the SPI to accept all of my sockpuppets?Next edit →
Line 61: Line 61:


] Thank you for your offer, I am ready to put things right this time. Thank you ] (]) 18:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC) ] Thank you for your offer, I am ready to put things right this time. Thank you ] (]) 18:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
::{{re|DelusionMBT}} Dude, you need to cool down. This is not the end of the world. There is a lot you can do without being a Misplaced Pages editor. Unfortunately, this is the only place you can request your unblock now. Cool down, take your time and let the admins take their time as well and admins say 6 months then its 6 months, watch movies, read books, spend time on social media, you can do a lot without being an editor so don't think that its an end of world.
::{{ping|Bbb23|Tide rolls|Drmies}} I know ] and ] already rejected his unblock request. Is there anything you can do about it if he promises to be sock-free. I see all of his accounts that he used, he did not use them at the same time so i don't think he influenced any consensus building process. All these accounts were used at different times. While clicking around, i have seen there are many editors who were given shorter blocks for the same violation, i will mention them if need be. I have seen an investigation where editor was given one week or two week block. I think six months will be harsh being that he did not know about this complete process. He might have accepted these user accounts if he was given a chance but i am sure he was thinking that CU will only match him with TalhaZubairButt which i was even sure that they are not the same. ] | ] | 18:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:18, 28 March 2016

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Misplaced Pages:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Misplaced Pages

The Misplaced Pages tutorial is a good place to start learning about Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 23:19, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Kautilya3 (talk) 23:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Information icon Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/TalhaZubairButt. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 19:34, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Its funny coming from you, when its you who have started a fake investigation against me on unfounded grounds lets see what the result comes out to be. I though still stick by my claim of calling you a bigot and blaming you for harassing new/inexperienced editors (I am by no means an exception) on the wiki pedia community while pushing your rather sinister nationalistic rhetoric without any proofs or regards for the wikipedia rules and policies.DelusionMBT (talk) 19:39, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Requesting Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DelusionMBT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blamed for being a sock of Talha Zubair Butt, which I clearly am not. Being on Misplaced Pages is a continuously learning process and I believe this time I didn`t do anything wrong and tried my best to abide by the rules for the reasons cause of which I was blocked earlier.This time I didn`t involve myself in edit warring or anything else to deserve this block. I kindly request you to unblock me as I have already learned from my previous mistakes which can be reflected in my current edits as well.

Decline reason:

This block is based on technical evidence. We can see that you edited as AlKhalidMBT, GreenBeret65 and VisionHawk. These accounts edited the same article giving a false sense of support. We consider that very dishonest and damaging to our project. HighInBC 17:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How can I go to the SPI to accept all of my sockpuppets?

Dear SheriffIsInTown,

I don`t think that I can post any where else, can I please be informed that how can I go to the SPI to accept my previous accounts, which were ofcourse due to my ignorance I am still not fully aware of the meaning of sock puppetry. The reason I am asking you is because you have instructed me to go to the other place which I cant, as I cannot post any where else. I have already requested an unblock from my own page. User:SheriffIsInTown DelusionMBT (talk) DelusionMBT (talk) 17:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC)17:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

I will ping @Mike V: who can consider this request of yours. I have already denied your unlbock request but perhaps Mike will think differently. HighInBC 17:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
DelusionMBT: Sorry, but I will not be able to grant an unblock request. In addition to the accounts listed, you previously used the account creation tool in an attempt to create another account. The community does not view this favorably. If you wish to resume editing, we encourage you to go 6 months without editing or creating new accounts. After that period, we will be willing to review your unblock request. Mike V • Talk 17:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Admins: Please note that, the presence of such users is a great threat to the encyclopedia. This user was involve in POV-Pushing and vandalism with his three sock accounts on Husain Haqqani article. He also did personal attacks on other users including me across multiple articles/Users talk pages and in SPI too. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 18:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

User: MBlaze Lightning :::Admins: Please note that I am still a novice, and I still stick by my claim that MBlaze Lightning is involved in bullying and harrasing new editors based on his nationalist rhetoric. I was not involved in any sort of POV pushing from this account, rather it is MBlaze Lightning who is involved in POV pushing on Research and Analysis Wing and Indo-Pak 1965 war articles. I haven`t launched any attacks what so ever on any other users, though I do admit that I did get involved in conflict with MBlaze Lightning because he was bullying another editor User:TalhaZubairButt, he claimed that I was his sock which I was not. I also kindly request you to kindly please consider my appology for my previous mistakes which I have committed due to my own ignorance, Thank youDelusionMBT (talk) 18:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Dear User:Mike V & User: HighInBC I do wish to resume editing, and I also believe that I have learned from my previous mistakes and this can be reflected from the edits that I have made from this account this time and trying to reach a consensus before making the edits, 6 months is a very long period of time. I am still a novice as far as wikipedia is concerned otherwise I would have requested an unblock request from my previous accounts also the only article because of which I was involved in a conflict was of Hussain Haqqani and this time I didn`t do any edit warring and tried reaching a consensus before doing the edits, can the 6 month period please be reduced as its a very long period of time and I believe that I have suffered long enought and have matured up a bit in this time. Also is there anything else which I can do to make up for this which can help me to get back to be an editor on wikipedia? Thank you DelusionMBT (talk) 17:56, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

6 months is our standard offer. It is a courtesy way back we let people have. I see no reason to make a special offer for you, the standard offer is what everyone else gets. HighInBC 18:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC) 
User:HighInBC Thank you for your offer, I am ready to put things right this time. Thank you DelusionMBT (talk) 18:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
@DelusionMBT: Dude, you need to cool down. This is not the end of the world. There is a lot you can do without being a Misplaced Pages editor. Unfortunately, this is the only place you can request your unblock now. Cool down, take your time and let the admins take their time as well and admins say 6 months then its 6 months, watch movies, read books, spend time on social media, you can do a lot without being an editor so don't think that its an end of world.
@Bbb23, Tide rolls, and Drmies: I know HighInBC and Mike V already rejected his unblock request. Is there anything you can do about it if he promises to be sock-free. I see all of his accounts that he used, he did not use them at the same time so i don't think he influenced any consensus building process. All these accounts were used at different times. While clicking around, i have seen there are many editors who were given shorter blocks for the same violation, i will mention them if need be. I have seen an investigation where editor was given one week or two week block. I think six months will be harsh being that he did not know about this complete process. He might have accepted these user accounts if he was given a chance but i am sure he was thinking that CU will only match him with TalhaZubairButt which i was even sure that they are not the same. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)