User talk:MBlaze Lightning: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 06:51, 29 March 2016 editGreek Legend (talk \| contribs)1,517 edits →March 2016 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:14, 29 March 2016 edit undoFreeatlastChitchat (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users4,942 edits →March 2016 Next edit →
Line 228:		Line 228:

	:: On 24th March you were given Arbitration notice. The sanction is for one month. Till 24th April, don't edit any pages where these editors are active. Let them push their POV. You can edit Bollywood movie pages. I don't know the list of articles coming under this India-Pakistan Afghanistan arbitration. You should ask them for a list of articles. But just don't edit these India-Pakistan war related articles, Army, Navy, Air Force, Spy Agencies, Kashmir, Siachen etc, for one month. 72 hours means three days. After three days you should not repeat the behaviour, as the administrator has warned that the block period will increase. Try not to get blocked ever again in future. ] (]) 06:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)		:: On 24th March you were given Arbitration notice. The sanction is for one month. Till 24th April, don't edit any pages where these editors are active. Let them push their POV. You can edit Bollywood movie pages. I don't know the list of articles coming under this India-Pakistan Afghanistan arbitration. You should ask them for a list of articles. But just don't edit these India-Pakistan war related articles, Army, Navy, Air Force, Spy Agencies, Kashmir, Siachen etc, for one month. 72 hours means three days. After three days you should not repeat the behaviour, as the administrator has warned that the block period will increase. Try not to get blocked ever again in future. ] (]) 06:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
			:: Quite right ] has hit the nail on the head. These blocks are not punitive measure, you learn from them. I try to adhere to 1PR since my blocks. Also if someone asks you that you are going abv 1PR, just self revert, it restores the article to a status quo and you can use the TP to edit. I have literally zero hard feelings for you, perhaps you can ping me when you come back and we can both leave politics for a month and edit movie pages. I'll be glad to hear from you. Cheers. ] (]) 07:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:14, 29 March 2016

Welcome!

Hello, MBlaze Lightning, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Misplaced Pages Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Misplaced Pages. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Indo-Pakistani War

Hi, you introduced a reference in this edit that is not mentioned anywhere else in the article, resulting in a citation error. Please fix this. Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 09:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Done ! well thanks for informing me ! MBlaze Lightning (talk) 09:57, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

February 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
\|unit cost= US$412 million for FY2012)<ref>[http://www.gao.gov/assets/320/317081.pdf "Defense Acquisitions: Assessments of Selected like capacity, leave it blank. For additional lines, end your alt units with a right parenthesis ")" and start a new, fully formatted line beginning with an asterisk "*" --> \|range main=>1,600 nmi \|ceiling main=>65,000 ft

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dassault nEUROn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to MILHIST

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 09:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bangladesh Liberation War may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Paramilitary including police <br /> 12,000 Civilians including ])<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=nuYcwYCcjpIC&pg=PA216&dq=many+pakistani+

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Y done. MBlaze Lightning (talk) 08:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions/Alert (code=ipa)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 10:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Misplaced Pages:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
Misplaced Pages:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Misplaced Pages:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:39, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Y thanks! MBlaze Lightning (talk) 16:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HAL AMCA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stealth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Y done! MBlaze Lightning (talk) 10:51, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

can u please improve Military of India's Portal?

hi. can u please improve Military of India wikipedia Portal? Actuly if u compare it with something like US military portal, u realize that the Indian one is too childish. Also it is inaccurate coz Indian Coast Guard is not a part of Indian military in reality (see ), but it has been listed so in the portal. I wanted to improve this portal myself, but I'm not familiar with the process.Netstar1 (talk) 00:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Y Ok, I will look into it in my free time. MBlaze Lightning (talk) 08:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages and copyright

Hello MBlaze Lightning, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. All or some of your addition(s) to Aerial warfare has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Misplaced Pages, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Misplaced Pages:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Misplaced Pages:Copyrights. You may also want to review Misplaced Pages:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Misplaced Pages:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Misplaced Pages articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Misplaced Pages project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:42, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Apologies. I somehow mistakenly added that content from rbth site, while editing.... Anyway thanks for informing me, I'll keep that in my mind! MBlaze Lightning (talk) 22:09, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi MBlaze!

You have pending replies on Talk:Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, please reply. 14.98.84.194 (talk) 05:08, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 14:18, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Battle of Hill 3234

MBlaze Lightning But I have added credible sources from books also. See the links ] and ]. The source claim that Afghans fought against them. 85.154.171.202 (talk) 12:45, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

@85.154.171.202: Your sources says about 39 Soviet troops fought against 200+ Mujaheedins and this is well mentioned in the article itself! However, some of the sources mentioned in the article also states that the attackers were reportedly wearing black uniforms with chevrons of black, gold and red on their arms and hence suspiciously they were Black Storks (Commando unit of SSG). MBlaze Lightning (talk) 13:30, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Not some, I have seen the source and it is only one book. However there are numerous books which can counter the claim. Though even ISIS members wear black uniforms. Does that makes them commandos? 85.154.171.202 (talk) 13:51, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

@85.154.171.202: Doesn't really matter if there is one book or two, what matter is that the source is reliable or not, And the given source is reliable and says about pakistan's involvement! Beside, If you have reliable sources that you think can be added, please provide, i will be happy to add them. MBlaze Lightning (talk) 13:58, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

No original research was added. A nonexistent marriage was added, with no reliable sources to back it up. Iistal (talk) 21:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

WP:WIKIHOUNDING

Read this. --Greek Legend (talk) 10:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Greek Legend Thank you! And, I am familiar with it. - MBlaze Lightning (talk) 11:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

You should take the matter to WP:ANI. If someone follows your edit regularly, editing pages where he never edited before. You can show the edits and differences. Administrators will take action against such editors. --Greek Legend (talk) 03:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:An IAF Mi-17 drops supplies for troops in Siachen.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:An IAF Mi-17 drops supplies for troops in Siachen.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Misplaced Pages's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ 22:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You may make no more than one revert every 24 hours to a page within the India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan topic area for a period of 1 month, subject to the standard exceptions.

You have been sanctioned due to repeated edit warring

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. slakr 02:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi MBlaze, 1RR is not bad. That is what most of us follow on our volition anyway. Please learn to talk more and revert less. - Kautilya3 (talk) 13:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MBlaze_Lightning reported by User:FreeatlastChitchat (Result: ). Thank you. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Tamil people

Hi MBlaze, Would you consider taking some time to help us on Talk:Tamils? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Sure Kautilya3! I will look into it in my free time. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 06:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Larkana (Sindh, Pakistan)

Hi, can you keep an eye on "Sheriff" whom you recently warned on 'revert-edit war'? He seems to be following what he wants, that is pursuing his pronvicialist agenda. He has been removing stuff from Larkana and then inserting his mother-tongue 'Punjabi language' without citing any source. He reverts and removes sourced stuff, but somehow pushes ahead his selective material without providing any source.

If you have time then please revert Larkana edit-history to that before his biased reverting to that of Indusengineer (that's me). I even left a message at his talk-page and on Larkana's talk-page but he hasn't responded to my questions, as to what made him revert those edits. Thanks my friend! (Sarfaraz 01:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC))

I have watchlisted that page now. If he is reverting you, then you can discuss the matter at talk page! Or you can take that matter to WP:DRN also. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 07:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)I hope you both know this falls under WP:CANVASS?—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ 12:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

WP:CANVASS is about collecting votes for RfCs and AfDs. It is not a bar against editors collaborating, or new editors seeking help from experienced editors. But, in any case, I never knew that Larkana was so hot. I am checking it myself. - Kautilya3 (talk) 19:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

I beg to differ. WP:CANVASS says, invitations are allowed in following cases:

On the talk pages of a user mentioned in the discussion (particularly if the discussion concerns complaints about user behavior). - MBL was never mentioned.

On the user talk pages of concerned editors. Examples include:

Editors who have made substantial edits to the topic or article - MBL havent made a single edit on the said page.
Editors who have participated in previous discussions on the same topic (or closely related topics) - Nada
Editors known for expertise in the field - Zilch
Editors who have asked to be kept informed - I highly doubt that.

This rather may be a case of WP:NPA broadly construed as it involves an editor (Sheriff) on whom an suggestion 'for keeping an eye' is being made, which MBL agreed to by 'watching' the said page.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ 19:29, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

AN3

Hi MBlaze, I am not sure why you are pushing against Sheriff. He hasn't breached 3RR and you didn't even open a talk page discussion. So, nothing will come of it. Instead, you are likely to get hurt because you are already under a sanction. You should probably delete the whole thing, say sorry to Sheriff and move on. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 18:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Done. Well, The Edit warring between him and that IP was bit confusing because of multiple edits there. I see he didn't went ahead after 3 reverts so I have withdrawn that report. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 18:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Research and Analysis Wing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ISI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Y Done. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 18:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	The way your opponents were screaming and shouting against you. Now they are all confused after that SPI. But still you should first learn many things. Don't hesitate to ask questions on Teahouse. I don't know many things. If you don't ask questions, you may make mistake as you did by report Sheriff at edit warring. Thanks. Greek Legend (talk) 02:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Greek Legend, I appreciate. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 06:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. slakr 04:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Slakr Hi, I just sent you an email, please check it. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 06:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

On 24th March you were given Arbitration notice. The sanction is for one month. Till 24th April, don't edit any pages where these editors are active. Let them push their POV. You can edit Bollywood movie pages. I don't know the list of articles coming under this India-Pakistan Afghanistan arbitration. You should ask them for a list of articles. But just don't edit these India-Pakistan war related articles, Army, Navy, Air Force, Spy Agencies, Kashmir, Siachen etc, for one month. 72 hours means three days. After three days you should not repeat the behaviour, as the administrator has warned that the block period will increase. Try not to get blocked ever again in future. Greek Legend (talk) 06:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Quite right Greek Legend has hit the nail on the head. These blocks are not punitive measure, you learn from them. I try to adhere to 1PR since my blocks. Also if someone asks you that you are going abv 1PR, just self revert, it restores the article to a status quo and you can use the TP to edit. I have literally zero hard feelings for you, perhaps you can ping me when you come back and we can both leave politics for a month and edit movie pages. I'll be glad to hear from you. Cheers. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)