Revision as of 20:30, 11 August 2006 editCowman109 (talk | contribs)6,540 edits →[]: Harrassment← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:25, 24 August 2006 edit undoRyulong (talk | contribs)218,132 edits copyright violations | ||
(57 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; width: 242px; border: #0000FF solid 1px" | |||
From ], to me: | |||
|- | |||
:''How dare you get rid of my own response on MY OWN page? You don't deserve anything from me, you're the lousiest Misplaced Pages editor I've ever seen. --] 23:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)'' | |||
! bgcolor="#FFFF00" | <center>Admin-related</center> | |||
|- | |||
| {{userbox|#FFEECC|#FFFFFF|43 h| This user has been blocked for 43 hours, but feels no more than 8 h would have been right.}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{userbox|#FF0000|#FFEECC|]| This user has been blocked by ] with an expiry time of 3 hours ''(disruption, trolling and personal attacks)''}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{userbox|#FF0000|#FFEECC|]| This user has been blocked by ] with an expiry time of 40 hours ''(3RR violations on Thierry_Henry and USSR_national_football_team)''}} | |||
|} | |||
== Three-Revert Rule == | |||
Edited according to | |||
You are in danger of violating the ] on Ukraine national football team. Please cease further reverts or you may be ] from further editing. <!-- Template:3RR4 --> ] (]) 22:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:''It's a good rule of thumb to not edit war, ''ever'', over what another user does on his/her talkpage. You run a big risk of being seen as petty or frivolous when you do that, and the 3RR might be enforced against you instead. The removal of warnings on one's own page is "discouraged", not outlawed, and the 3RR is usually not enforced against such edits. Anyway, he removes a warning, that means he's seen it. There's no need to keep shoving it in his face. Please leave his page alone. ] | ] 00:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC).'' | |||
--] 16:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Removing talk page warnings== | |||
Please do not remove warnings and other content from your talk page. It is considered ] and may be ]. You can ] it instead. ] (]) 22:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Re: Serbia kits == | |||
: Ok. I simply read the text and removed it because it was no longer useful, but if the rules require to keep all the warnings I'll keep them. I am just not sure about one thing: should I keep ''all'' the comments, or can delete the non-warning threads after they are "closed"?--] 23:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
::I strongly recommend keeping (or ]) them all, but there is nothing against deleting a non-warning message that you have replied to. ] (]) 00:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
I found pictures of the new Nike kit on the website. The English language version has not been updated, but you can see the images in the latest news section of the Serbian language version. There is also another English language-only website that reports on South-Eastern European football, and you see a news article there as well . --] 16:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Sock puppets== | |||
:There is no photo recently that confirms the socks, but there is a old image that they did released before the kit was finalized that also represents this ... . There was also an article on that confirmed this as well as the white away kit, but there are no images there. --] 18:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
For your information, it is considered a violation of ] to create new accounts to circumvent restrictions or make a position seem like it has more support than it sounds. New users do not make their first post on ], as ] did. While I have no evidence to accuse you of anything and thus do not do so, I would just like to bring all this to your attention. ] (]) 22:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Elo ratings history on national football team infobox == | |||
: Is there a way I can prove it is not a sockpuppet of mine? Also, I read in ] there are allowed uses of sockpuppets, such as "Keeping heated issues in one small area".--] 23:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Hi, saw your addition of the optional Elo rating history fields to ]. Good concept, and personally I support Elo ratings over FIFA ratings generally. But - do you know of an actual source for this data? The Elo ratings site itself seems only to have the maximum rating for each team, with no date, and nothing about the lowest rating. -- ] 10:18, 17 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
== 3RR Response == | |||
:Hi. I plan to take each team page, with all the matches and the relative rankings, grep each team line, take the highest and lowest ranking, and publish them. I shall add the first values soon.--] 13:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Hi and thank you for your response to a 3RR violation. Although I may not agree with your ruling, I will accept it as is. The problem now is that the same person has now began harassing me, , on my own talk page and is deleting my OWN responses without my permission. I'm not exactly sure what the right thing for me to do is, but I just want nothing to do with this guy. I apologize for some of the strong language that I've used in my responses, but I have never seen anyone as persistent as this poster. Thanks and let me know, --] 23:50, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Before your decision, I put a 3RR warning in his talk page, which Palffy removed. When you wrote me that it is forbidden to remove warnings, I readded it, with your text as an explanation: he removed it again. My question is if the keep-the-warning rule applies to each contributor, or only to selected ones.--] 23:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
::I'm just heading to bed, can you please post on ] and another admin will sort it out. ] (]) 23:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
== |
== www.soccer-europe.com == | ||
Actually, in the user's discussion page at ], it says: | |||
I feel that you should stop putting the three revert rule warning on ] userpage. He has already gotten the message, and now he is feeling harassed. It is probably best to simply step away from him as this conflict is clearly not getting anywhere. The page is now protected, so it's best to continue discussion on the talk page. Thank you. <font color="DarkGreen">]</font><sup>]</sup> 18:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:''Soccer-europe.com 20:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)To all authors : Please make sure my site is credited whenever my images are used as follows : | |||
:This time I will ask you to please stop provoking Palffy and posting comments on his user talk page that could appear as confrontational. I already asked you to leave him alone, so please stop making edits that could be viewed as harrassment. Thank you. <font color="DarkGreen">]</font><sup>]</sup> 20:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
: | |||
:© http://soccer-europe.com'' | |||
I realize I neglected to include the copyright symbol, but it's clear that the user wants the site credited every time images from the site are used. ] 00:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
:I agree that it's not that important to have pictures for footballer pages, but personally, I'd prefer to have an image with a copyright notice than to have users keep putting up unfree images they find on websites. To me, that's the lesser of the two evils. But if you want to take the pictures down, I won't have a problem with it. ] 00:32, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
I'm not sure, but I think ] is the best place to start, since the page is devoted to discussing images from soccer-europe.com, and maybe add a link to the discussion at ]? ] 00:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Spanish Legion == | |||
I have ] the article Spanish Foreign Legion for renaming to its current official name, Spanish Legion. Regards, ]] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 12:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Kit Colours == | |||
I got the kit colours of: http://www.national-football-teams.com/php/land.php?landid=264, but I'm not sure if they are right or not. - ] 16:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
== copyright violations == | |||
Those logos do not fall under fair use doctrine or copyright violations, as they have been produced in the public domain. They can be used as if they were any other free use image on Misplaced Pages. If you continue these actions, you may be subject to longer blocks. ] 00:25, 24 August 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:25, 24 August 2006
| ||
| ||
|
- It's a good rule of thumb to not edit war, ever, over what another user does on his/her talkpage. You run a big risk of being seen as petty or frivolous when you do that, and the 3RR might be enforced against you instead. The removal of warnings on one's own page is "discouraged", not outlawed, and the 3RR is usually not enforced against such edits. Anyway, he removes a warning, that means he's seen it. There's no need to keep shoving it in his face. Please leave his page alone. Bishonen | talk 00:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC).
--Kwame Nkrumah 16:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Re: Serbia kits
I found pictures of the new Nike kit on the Football Association of Serbia website. The English language version has not been updated, but you can see the images in the latest news section of the Serbian language version. There is also another English language-only website that reports on South-Eastern European football, and you see a news article there as well JadranSport. --Lowg 16:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- There is no photo recently that confirms the socks, but there is a old image that they did released before the kit was finalized that also represents this ... another article on JadranSport. There was also an article on UEFA.com that confirmed this as well as the white away kit, but there are no images there. --Lowg 18:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Elo ratings history on national football team infobox
Hi, saw your addition of the optional Elo rating history fields to Template:Infobox National football team. Good concept, and personally I support Elo ratings over FIFA ratings generally. But - do you know of an actual source for this data? The Elo ratings site itself seems only to have the maximum rating for each team, with no date, and nothing about the lowest rating. -- Wantok 10:18, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hi. I plan to take each team page, with all the matches and the relative rankings, grep each team line, take the highest and lowest ranking, and publish them. I shall add the first values soon.--Kwame Nkrumah 13:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
www.soccer-europe.com
Actually, in the user's discussion page at User talk:Soccer-europe.com, it says:
- Soccer-europe.com 20:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)To all authors : Please make sure my site is credited whenever my images are used as follows :
- © http://soccer-europe.com
I realize I neglected to include the copyright symbol, but it's clear that the user wants the site credited every time images from the site are used. Ytny 00:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- I agree that it's not that important to have pictures for footballer pages, but personally, I'd prefer to have an image with a copyright notice than to have users keep putting up unfree images they find on websites. To me, that's the lesser of the two evils. But if you want to take the pictures down, I won't have a problem with it. Ytny 00:32, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure, but I think User talk:Soccer-europe.com is the best place to start, since the page is devoted to discussing images from soccer-europe.com, and maybe add a link to the discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Football? Ytny 00:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Spanish Legion
I have listed the article Spanish Foreign Legion for renaming to its current official name, Spanish Legion. Regards, E Asterion 12:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Kit Colours
I got the kit colours of: http://www.national-football-teams.com/php/land.php?landid=264, but I'm not sure if they are right or not. - Nick C 16:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
copyright violations
Those logos do not fall under fair use doctrine or copyright violations, as they have been produced in the public domain. They can be used as if they were any other free use image on Misplaced Pages. If you continue these actions, you may be subject to longer blocks. Ryūlóng 00:25, 24 August 2006 (UTC)