| Revision as of 18:29, 15 April 2016 editHappyValleyEditor (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users9,514 edits COI warning | Revision as of 18:54, 15 April 2016 edit undoEleesa Dadiani (talk | contribs)35 edits →Conflict of InterestNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Conflict of Interest== | == Conflict of Interest== | ||
| Please cease from editing the article on ], as you clearly have a ]. It also looks very bad when people edit their own pages-- and sometimes shows up in the media! In this clase it is clear you are interested in promoting the article subject, which makes editing his page a no-no. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. ] (]) 18:29, 15 April 2016 (UTC) | Please cease from editing the article on ], as you clearly have a ]. It also looks very bad when people edit their own pages-- and sometimes shows up in the media! In this clase it is clear you are interested in promoting the article subject, which makes editing his page a no-no. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. ] (]) 18:29, 15 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
| I wrote the article, therefore I can edit it. I removed all references to Dadiani Fine Art even though it is relevant as this is where he is exhibiting. A quote by a fellow artist, Michael Sandle, is very much relevant to Paul Wager's origin's and work. You have reduced the article to an incomplete and barren state which would do the artist, Paul Wager, a great dishonour to allow it public in that state. I have reverted it and omitted all references to Dadiani as per your indication, I have kept it as neutral as it can be given Paul Wager's long career as an artist. It is not wrong for me to write an article on an artist which has been consistently producing monumental works, it is a public oversight that no article has been written on Wager prior to my article. Please refrain from this pointless exercise of power when I have not violated anything; this is clearly your opinion that I am serving self interests which I find insulting and unfounded. | |||
Revision as of 18:54, 15 April 2016
Conflict of Interest
Please cease from editing the article on Paul Wager, as you clearly have a conflict of interest. It also looks very bad when people edit their own pages-- and sometimes shows up in the media! In this clase it is clear you are interested in promoting the article subject, which makes editing his page a no-no. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 18:29, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
I wrote the article, therefore I can edit it. I removed all references to Dadiani Fine Art even though it is relevant as this is where he is exhibiting. A quote by a fellow artist, Michael Sandle, is very much relevant to Paul Wager's origin's and work. You have reduced the article to an incomplete and barren state which would do the artist, Paul Wager, a great dishonour to allow it public in that state. I have reverted it and omitted all references to Dadiani as per your indication, I have kept it as neutral as it can be given Paul Wager's long career as an artist. It is not wrong for me to write an article on an artist which has been consistently producing monumental works, it is a public oversight that no article has been written on Wager prior to my article. Please refrain from this pointless exercise of power when I have not violated anything; this is clearly your opinion that I am serving self interests which I find insulting and unfounded.