Misplaced Pages

Korean influence on Japanese culture: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:21, 27 May 2016 editTH1980 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,729 edits Source edit. For Ha Woo Bong, it's easier to use only the book edited by James Lewis← Previous edit Revision as of 23:04, 23 June 2016 edit undoAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,575,318 editsm Dating maintenance tags: {{Who}}Next edit →
(74 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Korean influence on Japanese culture''' refers to the impact of continental influences transmitted through or originating in the ] on ]. Since the Korean Peninsula was the cultural bridge between ] and the Asian continent throughout much of Far Eastern history, these influences have been detected in a notable variety of aspects of Japanese culture. Korea played a significant role in the introduction of ] to Japan from ] via the Kingdom of ]. The modulation of continental styles of art in Korea has also been discerned in early ] and ], ranging from the ] to various smaller objects such as ], ] and ]. The role of ancient Korean states in the transmission of continental civilization, often moulded in turn by peninsular innovations, has long been neglected, and is increasingly the object of academic study. '''Korean influence on Japanese culture''' refers to the impact of continental Asian influences transmitted through or originating in the ] on ]. Since the Korean Peninsula was the cultural bridge between ] and the Asian continent throughout much of Far Eastern history, these influences have been detected in a variety of aspects of Japanese culture. Korea played a significant role in the introduction of ] to Japan from ] via the Kingdom of ]. The modulation of continental styles of art in Korea has also been discerned in early ] and ], ranging from the ] to smaller objects such as ]s, ]s and ]. The role of ancient Korean states in the transmission of continental civilization, often moulded in turn by peninsular innovations, has long been neglected, and is increasingly the object of academic study.

== Prehistoric contacts and the Jomon-Yayoi transition == == Prehistoric contacts and the Jomon-Yayoi transition ==
Prior to 400 BC Korean technology and cultural objects suddenly began appearing in Japan. During this new period of Japanese history, the Yayoi period, the forms of intensive agriculture and animal husbandry practiced in Korea were adopted in Japan, first in Kyushu which is closest to the Korean peninsula and soon all across Japan.<ref name="yayoi">Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 404, 416–419.</ref> The result was a major explosion in the Japanese population from 75,000 people in 400 BC to over five million by 250 AD.<ref name="influence"> Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 420–422.</ref> Japanese people also began to use metal tools, arrowheads, new forms of pottery, beads, moats, burial mounds, and styles of housing which were of Korean origin.<ref name="yayoi"/> Prior to 400 BC, around the start of Japan's Yayoi period, Korean technology and cultural objects suddenly began appearing in Japan.<ref name="yayoi">Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 404, 416–419.</ref> According to the opinion of the scholars C. Melvin Aikens, Sung-Rak Choi, Hyuk-Jin Ro, and Song-Nai Rhee, it was at this time that the forms of intensive agriculture and animal husbandry practiced in Korea were adopted in Japan, first in Kyushu which is closest to the Korean peninsula and soon all across Japan.<ref name="yayoi"/> The result was a major explosion in the Japanese population during the Yayoi period and subsequent Kofun period.<ref name="influence"> Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 420–422.</ref> Japanese people also began to use metal tools, arrowheads, new forms of pottery, beads, moats, burial mounds, and styles of housing which were of peninsular origin.<ref name="yayoi"/>

The cause of these dramatic changes in Japanese society was a massive influx of Korean immigrants, most of whom were men who married women native to Japan.<ref name="influence"/> The ], a famous archeological site in ] dating from the late Yayoi period, appears virtually identical to Korean villages of the same period.<ref name="bronze"> Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 430–432.</ref> The cause of these dramatic changes in Japanese society was a massive influx of Korean peninsular immigrants, most of whom were men who married women native to Japan.<ref name="influence"> Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 420–422.</ref> The ], a famous archeological site in ] dating from the late Yayoi period, appears virtually identical to villages in the Korean peninsula of the same period.<ref name="bronze"> Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 430–432.</ref>
Throughout the remainder of the Yayoi period Japan relied heavily on Korea as a source of tools and weapons made of bronze and iron. During this period Japan imported great numbers of Korean mirrors and daggers, which were the symbols of power in Korea. Combined with the curved jewel known as the ], Korea's "three treasures" soon became as prized by Japan's elites as Korea's, and in Japan they would later become the ].<ref name="bronze"/>
== Korean influence on ancient and classical Japan ==
During the Kofun period of ancient Japanese history, which begins around 250 AD, the tribes of Japan gradually coalesced into a centralized state.<ref name="history"> Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 432, 437–439, 447.</ref> Cultural contact with Korea, which at the time was divided into several independent states, played a decisive role in the development of Japanese government and society both during the Kofun period and the subsequent ].<ref name="farris">Farris (1998), pp. 69–70, 110, 116, 120–122.</ref><ref name="history"/> Most new innovations flowed from Korea into Japan, and not vice-versa, primarily due to Korea's closer proximity to China.<ref>Ch'on Kwan-u, "A New Interpretation of the Problems of Mimana (I)," ''Korea Journal'', February 1974, 11.</ref> Though many of the ideas and technologies which filtered into Japan from Korea were originally Chinese, historian William Wayne Farris notes that Korean peoples put "their distinctive stamp on" them before passing them on to Japan. Some such innovations were imported to Japan through trade, but in more cases they were brought to Japan by Korean immigrants. The ] state that eventually unified Japan was able to accomplish this feat partly due to its success at gaining a monopoly on the importation of Korean culture and technology into Japan.<ref name="farris"/> According to Farris, Japanese cultural borrowing from Korea "hit peaks in the mid-fifth, mid-sixth, and late seventh centuries" and "helped to define a material culture that lasted as long as a thousand years."<ref>Farris (1998), pp. 68, 120.</ref>
Throughout the remainder of the Yayoi period Japan relied heavily on Korea as a source of tools and weapons made of bronze and iron. During this period Japan imported great numbers of peninsular mirrors and daggers, which were the symbols of power in Korea. Combined with the curved jewel known as the ], Korea's "three treasures" soon became as prized by Japan's elites as Korea's, and in Japan they would later become the ].<ref name="bronze"/>
=== Korean immigration to Japan ===

]During this period a major factor behind the transfer of Korean culture to Japan was immigration from Korea. Most Korean immigrants, generically known as toraijin in Japanese, came during a period of intense regional warfare which racked the Korean peninsula between the years 371 and 670. Most of these immigrants were from Japan's allies, the Korean states of Baekje and ], and they were warmly welcomed by the Japanese government.<ref name="koreans"> Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 405, 433–436.</ref> Perhaps most significant of all was the flight of the Baekje elite, who came to Japan in two waves in 400 and 475 during invasions of Baekje by the Korean kingdom of ] and then again in 663 after Baekje fell to the kingdom of ].<ref>Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 438, 444.</ref> These immigrants brought their culture to Japan with them, and once there they often became leading officials, soldiers, artists, and craftsmen.<ref name="koreans"/> Korean immigrants were the leading players behind Japan's ] to ]<ref name="clans">Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 441–442.</ref> and some Koreans even married into the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080428-ancient-tomb.html|title=Japanese Royal Tomb Opened to Scholars for First Time|author=Tony McNicol|publisher=''National Geographic News''|date=April 28, 2008}}</ref><ref name="kim">Jinwung Kim, ''A History of Korea: From 'Land of the Morning Calm' to States in Conflict'' (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012), 75.</ref>
== Korean peninsular influences on ancient and classical Japan ==
During the Kofun period of ancient Japanese history, which begins around 250 AD, the tribes of Japan gradually coalesced into a centralized state.<ref name="history"> Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 432, 437–439, 447.</ref> For Hyung Il Pai, there was no clear Korean and Japanese national distinction as for the period around the 4th century CE., and that archaeological and material similarities between the two cannot be explained in terms of domination or conquest.<ref>Pai,pp. 234–235</ref>With the beginning of the Kofun period around 250 CE, gigantic tomb-building indicates the emergence of powerful warrior elites, fueled by more intensive agriculture and the introduction of iron technologies. Contact with the continental mainland increased, as Japan undertook intensive contacts with the southern Korean littoral ruling groups, in pursuit of securing supplies of iron and other material goods, while sending emissaries to China (in 238, 243 and 247). A pattern developed of intense military and political dealings with peninsula Korean powers that was to continue for four centuries. Korean peninsular technology and cultural objects suddenly began appearing in Japan. It is unknown whether family and linguistic relations underlay these contacts, but over time, peoples from the mainland would emigrate or seek refuge in Japan, and their presence would play an important role in the institutional and cultural developments of the Japanese archipelago. Japanese people also began to use metal tools, arrowheads, new forms of pottery, beads, moats, burial mounds, and styles of housing which were of Korean peninsular origin.<ref>Totman pp.62-63</ref><ref name="yayoi">Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 404, 416–419.</ref>

Cultural contact with Korea, which at the time was divided into several independent states, played a decisive role in the development of Japanese government and society both during the Kofun period and the subsequent ].<ref name="farris">Farris (1998), pp. 69–70, 110, 116, 120–122.</ref><ref name="history"/> Most new innovations flowed from Korea into Japan, and not vice-versa, primarily due to Korea's closer proximity to China.<ref>Ch'on Kwan-u, p. 11.</ref> Though many of the ideas and technologies which filtered into Japan from Korea were originally Chinese, historian William Wayne Farris notes that Korean peninsular peoples put "their distinctive stamp on" them before passing them on to Japan. Some such innovations were imported to Japan through trade, but in more cases they were brought to Japan by peninsular immigrants. The ] state that eventually unified Japan was able to accomplish this feat partly due to its success at gaining a monopoly on the importation of Korean peninsular culture and technology into Japan.<ref name="farris"/> According to Farris, Japanese cultural borrowing from Korea "hit peaks in the mid-fifth, mid-sixth, and late seventh centuries" and "helped to define a material culture that lasted as long as a thousand years."<ref>Farris (1998), pp. 68, 120.</ref>
=== Immigration from the Korean peninsular to Japan ===
By 700 perhaps one third of all Japanese aristocrats were of recent Korean origin,<ref name="farris"/> including the influential Aya clan and ].<ref name="clans"/> Although Koreans settled throughout Japan, they were especially concentrated in ], the region where the Japanese capital was located. Between eighty and ninety percent of people living in Nara had Korean Baekje ancestry by the year 773, and recent anatomical analyses indicate that modern-day Japanese people living in this area continue to be more closely related to ethnic Koreans than any other in Japan.<ref name="clans"/>
]During this period a major factor behind the transfer of peninsular Korean culture to Japan was immigration from Korea. Most peninsular immigrants, generically known as ''toraijin''( 渡来人) in Japanese, came during a period of intense regional warfare which racked the Korean peninsula between the years 371 and 670. Japanese traditions held that the Yamato kingdom has sent military expeditions to assist Baekje as early as 369 CE, military aid that is said to have enabled the latter to secure control of Naktong against its enemies, ] and ].<ref>Pai, p.234.</ref> Most of these immigrants were from Japan's allies, the peninsular states of Baekje and ], and they were welcomed by the Japanese government.<ref name="koreans"> Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 405, 433–436.</ref> Perhaps most significant of all was the flight of the Baekje elite, which is said to have come to Japan in two waves in 400 and 475 during successive invasions of Baekje by the Goguryeo and then again in 663 after Baekje fell to the kingdom of Silla.<ref>Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 438, 444.</ref> These refugees brought their culture to Japan with them, and once there they often became leading officials, soldiers, artists, and craftsmen.<ref name="koreans"/> Korean peninsular immigrants played a significant role in Japan's ] to ].<ref name="clans">Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 441–442.</ref> and some peninsular families are even said to have married into the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080428-ancient-tomb.html|title=Japanese Royal Tomb Opened to Scholars for First Time|author=Tony McNicol|publisher=''National Geographic News''|date=April 28, 2008}}</ref><ref name="kim">Kim, p. 75.</ref>
By 700, it has been conjectured, perhaps one third of all Japanese aristocrats may have been of relatively recent peninsular origin,<ref name="farris"/> including the influential Aya clan.<ref name="clans"/> Although peninsular immigrants settled throughout Japan, they were especially concentrated in ], the region where the Japanese capital was located. According to one estimate, from 80 to 90 percent of people in Nara had Baekje ancestry by the year 773, and recent anatomical analyses indicate that modern-day Japanese people living in this area continue to be more closely related to ethnic Koreans than any other in Japan.<ref name="clans"/>
The Soga clan, a clan with close ties to the Baekje elite, may also have been of Korean Baekje ancestry.<ref name="soga">Donald McCallum, ''The Four Great Temples: Buddhist Archaeology, Architecture, and Icons of Seventh-Century Japan'' (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2009), 19.</ref> Scholars who have argued in favor of the theory that the Soga had Korean ancestry include Song-Nai Rhee, C. Melvin Aikens, Sung-Rak Choi, Hyuk-Jin Ro, Teiji Kadowaki, and William Wayne Farris.<ref name="culture"/><ref name="soga"/><ref>William Wayne Farris, ''Japan to 1600: A Social and Economic History'' (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2009), 25.</ref>
The Soga clan, a clan with close ties to the Baekje elite, may also have been of Baekje ancestry.<ref name="soga">McCallum (2009), p. 19.</ref> Scholars who have argued in favor of the theory that the Soga had peninsular ancestry include Song-Nai Rhee, C. Melvin Aikens, Sung-Rak Choi, Hyuk-Jin Ro, Teiji Kadowaki, and William Wayne Farris.<ref name="culture"/><ref name="soga"/><ref>Farris (2009), p. 25.</ref>

=== Arms and armament === === Arms and armament ===
During most of the Kofun period Japan relied on Korea as its sole source of iron swords, spears, armor, and helmets.<ref name="armor">Farris (1998), pp. 72–76.</ref> ] and later Japan's first ], as well as subsequent innovations in producing them, arrived in Japan from Korea, particularly the Korean states of Silla and Gaya.<ref name="armor"/><ref>Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, p. 438.</ref> Japan's first crossbow was delivered by Goguryeo in 618.<ref name="war">Farris (1998), pp. 105, 109.</ref> During most of the Kofun period Japan relied on Korea as its sole source of iron swords, spears, armor, and helmets.<ref name="armor">Farris (1998), pp. 72–76.</ref> ] and later Japan's first ], as well as subsequent innovations in producing them, arrived in Japan from Korea, particularly from Silla and Gaya.<ref name="armor"/><ref>Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, p. 438.</ref> Japan's first crossbow was delivered by Goguryeo in 618.<ref name="war">Farris (1998), pp. 105, 109.</ref>
At a time in history when horses were a key military weapon, Baekje immigrants also established Japan's first horse-raising farms in what would become Japan's ]. One historian, Koichi Mori, theorizes that ]'s close friendships with Baekje horsemen played an important role in helping him to assume the throne.<ref name="baekje">Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 438–439.</ref> On top of the horses themselves, Korea also gave Japan its first horse carriages and other related trappings.<ref name="horse">Farris (1998), pp. 77–79.</ref><ref name="baekje"/> Bites, stirrups, saddles, and bridles entered Japan from Korea by the early fifth century.<ref name="horse"/> At a time in history when horses were a key military weapon, Baekje immigrants also established Japan's first horse-raising farms in what would become Japan's ]. One historian, Koichi Mori, theorizes that ]'s close friendships with Baekje horsemen played an important role in helping him to assume the throne.<ref name="baekje">Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 438–439.</ref> Japan's first horse carriages and other trappings, such as bits, stirrups, saddles, and bridles were also imported from the peninsula by the early fifth century.<ref name="horse">Farris (1998), pp. 77–79.</ref><ref name="baekje"/><ref name="horse"/>
In 660 following the fall of Baekje, a Korean ally of Japan, the Japanese ] utilized skilled technicians from Baekje to construct at least seven fortresses to protect Japan's coastline from invasion.<ref>Michael Comoe, ''Shotoku: Ethnicity, Ritual, and Violence in the Japanese Buddhist Tradition'' (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 26.</ref> Japan's mountain fortifications in particular were based off Korean models.<ref name="war"/><ref>Bruce Batten, ''Gateway to Japan: Hakata in War And Peace, 500-1300'' (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2006), 27–28.</ref> In 660 following the fall its ally, Baekje, the Japanese ] utilized Baekje's skilled technicians to construct at least seven fortresses to protect Japan's coastline from invasion.<ref>Comoe, p. 26.</ref> Japan's mountain fortifications in particular were based on peninsular models.<ref name="war"/><ref>Batten, pp. 27–28.</ref>
=== Pottery === === Pottery ===
Japan continued to import new forms of pottery from Korea just as it had during the earlier Yayoi period,<ref name="gaya">Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 433, 437–438, 441.</ref> and around the early fifth century the ] and ] also made their way from Korea to Japan.<ref name="stone">Farris (1998), pp. 84–87.</ref> ]Japan continued to import or native potters imitated new forms of pottery from Korea just as it had during the earlier Yayoi period,<ref>Farris 1998 pp.84-5</ref><ref name="gaya">Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 433, 437–438, 441.</ref> and around the early fifth century the ] and ] also made their way to Japan.<ref name="stone">Farris (1998), pp. 84–87.</ref> The earliest examples of ] in Japan, initially associated with aristocratic tombs, closely resemble the high-fired stoneware known as ''dojil togi'' uncovered in sites at ] and ] in the area of the ], and may have been introduced by refugees from Gaya which was attacked by Goguryeo in early 400s.<ref name="gaya"/>

]The most notable form of pottery to reach Japan from Korea was the high-fired stoneware known as dojil togi in Korea and ] in Japan which was brought by immigrants from Korean state of Gaya. Gayan refugees fleeing an attack by Goguryeo in 400 brought the first Sue ware to Japan and soon they were producing it domestically. Every aristocratic tomb in Japan from that point and on would contain a profusion of Gayan sue ware, and by the 700s Japanese commoners were using it as well. Baekje immigrants were also involved in creating sue ware.<ref name="gaya"/>
=== Ovens === === Ovens ===
The oven known as the kamado, popularly referred to as the "Korean oven" in Japan, was originally invented in China but was modified in Korea before being exported to Japan. According to the historian William Wayne Farris, the introduction of the kamado "had a profound effect on daily life in ancient Japan" and "represented a major advance for residents of Japan's pit dwellings". The ovens that Japanese people had previously used to cook their meals and heat their homes were less safe, more difficult to use, and less heat efficient. By the seventh century the kamado was in widespread use in Japan.<ref name="stone"/> The stove known as the '']'' was of continental origin, having been invented in China but was modified in by the peninsular peoples before it was introduced to Japan. According to the historian William Wayne Farris, the introduction of the ''kamado'' "had a profound effect on daily life in ancient Japan" and "represented a major advance for residents of Japan's pit dwellings". The hearth ovens(''ro'':炉/''umigamero'':埋甕炉) previously used to cook meals and heat homes were less safe, more difficult to use, and less heat efficient, and by the seventh century the ''kamado'' was in widespread use in Japan. According to Farris, Japanese people referred to the ''kamado'' as ''kara kamado'', which can be translated into English as "Korean ovens".<ref name="stone"/> However, in some parts of northeastern Japan, open-hearth ovens continued to be preferred.<ref>Totman, .</ref>

===Sewing===
According to the ], all the seamstresses of the village of Kume (來目) in Yamato province hailed from a sewing woman, Maketsu (眞毛津) who was given as tribute by the king of Baekje to the Yamato court.<ref>Tokyo National Museum, p.3.</ref>

=== Iron tools and iron metallurgy === === Iron tools and iron metallurgy ===
During the Kofun period, Korea supplied Japan with most of its iron tools, including chisels, saws, sickles, axes, spades, hoes, and plows.<ref name="tools">Farris (1998), pp. 79–82.</ref> Korean iron farming tools in particular contributed to a rise in Japan's population by possibly 250 to 300 percent.<ref>Farris (1998), p. 83.</ref> According to Farris, during the Kofun period, Korea was the source for most of Japan's iron tools, including chisels, saws, sickles, axes, spades, hoes, and plows.<ref name="tools">Farris (1998), pp. 79–82.</ref> Historically, the source of iron ingots in Korea was cut off when Yamato forces suffered defeats with their peninsular allies in 405, and again, later in 475, and, immigrant smelters developed furnaces to reuse the available iron. Later, after 450 CE, the ] elite found substitutes in local sands available by ] to make up the shortfall.<ref>Totman pp.67-68.</ref> Korean iron farming tools in particular contributed to a rise in Japan's population by possibly 250 to 300 percent.<ref>Farris (1998), p. 83.</ref>
However, it was the refugees who came after 400 from Gaya, a Korean state famous for its iron production, who established some of Japan's first native iron foundries.<ref>Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 8–12.</ref><ref name="gaya"/> The techniques of iron production which they brought to Japan are uniquely Korean and distinct from those used in China.<ref name="armor"/> The work of these Gayan refugees eventually permitted Japan to escape from its dependency on importing iron tools, armor, and weapons from Korea.<ref name="gaya"/> However, it was the refugees who came after 400 from Gaya, a Korean state famous for its iron production, who established some of Japan's first native iron foundries.<ref>Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 8–12.</ref><ref name="gaya"/> The techniques of iron production which they brought to Japan are uniquely Korean and distinct from those used in China.<ref name="armor"/> The work of these Gayan refugees eventually permitted Japan to escape from its dependency on importing iron tools, armor, and weapons from Korea.<ref name="gaya"/>

=== Dams and irrigation === === Dams and irrigation ===
The Japanese adapted continental U-shaped hoes and techniques for creating irrigation ponds. Extensive works uncovered in the ] near Osaka display developments far in advance of Yayoi period, and the suggestion is that both the technology and pond construction techniques were introduced by peninsular peoples from southern Korea.<ref>Farris, </ref>
The use of irrigation ponds, a valuable agricultural innovation, were introduced to Japan via Korea around the early to mid-fifth century.<ref name="tools"/> Not long after this Baekje immigrants are credited with engineering Japan's first substantial dam-building project by using native Baekje techniques to construct a series of dams and canals around Kawachi Lake. Their objective was to drain the wetlands around the lake and use the land for agriculture.<ref name="baekje"/> A similar project was successfully completed in Kyoto by the descendants of Korean immigrants from Silla.<ref name="clans"/>

=== Government and administration === === Government and administration ===
The centralization of the Japanese state in the sixth and seventh centuries also owes a debt to Korea. In 535 the Japanese government established military garrisons called "miyake" throughout Japan to control regional powers and in many cases staffed them with Korean immigrants.<ref name="state">Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 443–444.</ref> Soon after a system of "be", government-regulated groups of artisans, was created, as well as a new level of local administration and a tribute tax. All of these were probably modeled off similar systems used in Baekje and other parts of Korea.<ref name="state"/><ref name="law">Farris (1998), pp. 104–105.</ref> Likewise ]'s ] of 603, a form a meritocracy implemented for Japanese government positions, may have been copied directly from the Baekje model. One of the major symbols of the Japanese state's growing power during this period was the palace of ], which he appropriately called, "Baekje Palace".<ref name="state"/> The centralization of the Japanese state in the sixth and seventh centuries also owes a debt to Korea. In 535 the Japanese government established military garrisons called "miyake" throughout Japan to control regional powers and in many cases staffed them with Korean immigrants.<ref name="state">Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 443–444.</ref> Soon after a system of "be", government-regulated groups of artisans, was created, as well as a new level of local administration and a tribute tax. All of these were probably modeled off similar systems used in Baekje and other parts of Korea.<ref name="state"/><ref name="law">Farris (1998), pp. 104–105.</ref> Likewise ]'s ] of 603, a form a meritocracy implemented for Japanese government positions, may have been copied directly from the Baekje model. One of the major symbols of the Japanese state's growing power during this period was the palace of ], which he appropriately called, "Baekje Palace".<ref name="state"/>
Immigrants from Korea also played a role in drafting many important Japanese legal reforms of the era,<ref name="law"/> including the ].<ref>Mikiso Hane, ''Premodern Japan: A Historical Survey'' (Boulder: Westview Press, 1991), 15.</ref> Half of the individuals actively involved in drafting Japan's ] of 703 were Korean.<ref name="law"/> Immigrants from Korea also played a role in drafting many important Japanese legal reforms of the era,<ref name="law"/> including the ].<ref>Hane, p. 15.</ref> Half of the individuals actively involved in drafting Japan's ] of 703 were Korean.<ref name="law"/>

=== Writing === === Writing ===
Scribes from the Korean state of Baekje who wrote Chinese introduced writing to Japan in the early fifth century.<ref name="henshall">Kenneth G Henshall, ''A History of Japan: From Stone Age to Superpower'' (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1999), 17, 228.</ref><ref>Marc Hideo Miyake, ''Old Japanese: A Phonetic Reconstruction'' (New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003), 9.</ref><ref>Christopher Seeley, ''A History of Writing in Japan'' (New York: EJ Brill, 1991), 5–6, 23.</ref> The man traditionally credited as being the first to teach writing in Japan is the Baekje scholar ].<ref>Mikiso Hane, ''Premodern Japan: A Historical Survey'' (Boulder: Westview Press, 1991), 26.</ref> Though a small number of Japanese people were able to read Chinese before then, it was thanks to the work of scribes from Baekje that the use of writing was popularized among the Japanese governing elite.<ref name="henshall"/> For hundreds of years thereafter a steady stream of talented scribes would be sent from Korea to Japan,<ref>Farris (1998), p. 99.</ref> and some of these scholars from Baekje wrote and edited much of the Nihon Shoki, one of Japan's earliest works of history.<ref>Ch'on Kwan-u, "A New Interpretation of the Problems of Mimana (I)", ''Korea Journal'', February 1974, 18.</ref> Scribes from the Korean state of Baekje who wrote Chinese introduced writing to Japan in the early fifth century.<ref name="henshall">Henshall, pp. 17, 228.</ref><ref>Miyake, p. 9.</ref><ref>Seeley, pp. 5–6, 23.</ref> The man traditionally credited as being the first to teach writing in Japan is the Baekje scholar ].<ref>Hane, p. 26.</ref> Though a small number of Japanese people were able to read Chinese before then, it was thanks to the work of scribes from Baekje that the use of writing was popularized among the Japanese governing elite.<ref name="henshall"/> For hundreds of years thereafter a steady stream of talented scribes would be sent from Korea to Japan,<ref>Farris (1998), p. 99.</ref> and some of these scholars from Baekje wrote and edited much of the Nihon Shoki, one of Japan's earliest works of history.<ref>Ch'on, p. 18.</ref>
]According to Bjarke Frellesvig, "There is ample evidence, in the form of orthographic 'Koreanisms' in the early inscriptions in Japan, that the writing practices employed in Japan were modelled on continental examples.<ref name="Frellesvig 13">{{cite book|last=Frellesvig|first=Bjarke|title=A History of the Japanese Language|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=v1FcAgiAC9IC&pg=PA160|date=2010-07-29|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-139-48880-8|page=13}}</ref> The history of how the early Japanese modified the Chinese writing system to develop a native ] orthography is obscure, but scribal techniques developed in the Korean peninsular played an important role in the process of developing ].<ref>John R. Bentley, BRILL, 2001 p.9.</ref> The pronunciation of Chinese characters at this period thus may well reflect that current in the Paekje kingdom.<ref>Marc Hideo Miyake, Routledge 2013 pp.9ff.</ref> Frellesvig states, "However, writing extensive text passages entirely or mostly phonographically, reflected in the widespread use of ''man'yogana'', is a practice not attested in Korean sources which therefore seems to be an independent development which took place in Japan.<ref name="Frellesvig 13"/> Japanese ] share many symbols with Korean ], for example, suggesting the former arose in part at least from scribal practices in Korea, though the historical connections between the two systems are obscure.<ref name="LeeRamsey" >Ki-Moon Lee, S. Robert Ramsey, Cambridge University Press, 2011 p.2 (hyangga); p.84 (kugyŏl): "Simplified ''kugyŏl'' looks like the Japanese ''katakana''. Some of the resemblances are superficial&nbsp;... ut many other symbols are identical in form and value&nbsp;... We do not know just what the historical connections were between these two transcription systems. The origins of ''kugyŏl'' have still not been accurately dated or documented. But many in Japan as well as Korea believe that the beginnings of ''katakana'' and the orthographic principles they represent, derive at least in part from earlier practices on the Korean peninsular."</ref>
]According to Bjarke Frellesvig, "There is ample evidence, in the form of orthographic 'Koreanisms' in the early inscriptions in Japan, that the writing practices employed in Japan were modelled on continental examples.<ref name="Frellesvig 13">Frellesvig, </ref> The history of how the early Japanese modified the Chinese writing system to develop a native ] orthography is obscure, but scribal techniques developed in the Korean peninsular played an important role in the process of developing ].<ref>Bentley, .</ref> The pronunciation of Chinese characters at this period thus may well reflect that current in the Paekje kingdom.<ref>Miyake, .</ref> Frellesvig states, "However, writing extensive text passages entirely or mostly phonographically, reflected in the widespread use of ''man'yōgana'', is a practice not attested in Korean sources which therefore seems to be an independent development which took place in Japan."<ref name="Frellesvig 13"/> Japanese ] share many symbols with Korean ], for example, suggesting the former arose in part at least from scribal practices in Korea, though the historical connections between the two systems are obscure.<ref name="LeeRamsey" >Lee and Ramsey, : "Simplified ''kugyŏl'' looks like the Japanese ''katakana''. Some of the resemblances are superficial&nbsp;... ut many other symbols are identical in form and value&nbsp;... We do not know just what the historical connections were between these two transcription systems. The origins of ''kugyŏl'' have still not been accurately dated or documented. But many in Japan as well as Korea believe that the beginnings of ''katakana'' and the orthographic principles they represent, derive at least in part from earlier practices on the Korean peninsular."</ref>

=== Science, medicine, and math === === Science, medicine, and math ===
In the wake of ]'s dispatch of ambassadors to Baekje in 553, several Korean soothsayers, doctors, and calendrical scholars were sent to Japan.<ref>Jacques H. Kamstra, Brill Archive, 1967 p.60.</ref> The Baekje Buddhist priest and physician ] came to Japan in 1602, and, settling in the ''Genkōji'' temple(現光寺) where he played a notable role in establishing the ],<ref>James H. Grayson, Routledge, 2013 p.37.</ref> instructed several court students in the Chinese mathematics of ] and ].<ref>Agathe Keller, Alexei Volkov, in Alexander Karp, Gert Schubring (eds.) ''Handbook on the History of Mathematics Education'', Springer 2014 pp. 55–84, p.64.</ref> He introduced the Chinese ] calendrical system (developed by Hé Chéng Tiān (何承天) in 443 C.E.) and transmitted his skill in medicine and pharmacy to Japanese disciples, such as Hinamitachi (日並立)<ref>], ], (2002) Routledge, 2012 p.264.</ref><ref>Erhard Rosner, BRILL, 1988 p.13.</ref> In the wake of ]'s dispatch of ambassadors to Baekje in 553, several Korean soothsayers, doctors, and calendrical scholars were sent to Japan.<ref>Kamstra, .</ref> The Baekje Buddhist priest and physician ] came to Japan in 1602, and, settling in the ''Genkōji'' temple(現光寺) where he played a notable role in establishing the ],<ref>Grayson, .</ref> instructed several court students in the Chinese mathematics of ] and ].<ref>Keller and Volkov, .</ref> He introduced the Chinese ] calendrical system (developed by Hé Chéng Tiān (何承天) in 443 C.E.) and transmitted his skill in medicine and pharmacy to Japanese disciples, such as Hinamitachi (日並立)<ref>Lu and Needham, .</ref><ref>Rosner, .</ref>
Virtually every astronomer working in seventh century Japan was an immigrants from Korea, mostly Baekje. Native Japanese astronomers were gradually trained and by the eighth century only forty percent of Japanese astronomers were Korean.<ref name="pak">Song-nae Pak, ''Science and Technology in Korean History: Excursions, Innovations, and Issues'' (Fremont, California: Jain, 2005), 42–45.</ref> Furthermore, the ], a Japanese medical text written in 984, still contains many medical formulas of Korean origin.<ref>Song-nae Pak, ''Science and Technology in Korean History: Excursions, Innovations, and Issues'' (Fremont, California: Jain, 2005), 42–46.</ref>
During this same period, Japanese farmers divided their arable land using a system of measurement devised in Korea.<ref>Farris (1998), p. 105.</ref>
According to Nakayama Shigeru, nearly all 7th century astronomers in Japan came from Baekje, and only by the following century did the percentage of immigrant astronomers fall to 40% as local astronomers mastered the science.<ref>Sŏng-nae Pak, Jain Publishing Company, 2005 p.44 (Looks like it is self-published in a nationalist vanity press. Perhaps not RS)</ref> Native Japanese astronomers were gradually trained and by the eighth century only forty percent of Japanese astronomers were Korean.<ref name="pak">Pak, pp. 42–45.</ref> Furthermore, the ], a Japanese medical text written in 984, still contains many medical formulas of Korean origin.<ref>Pak, pp. 45–46.</ref> During this same period, Japanese farmers divided their arable land using a system of measurement devised in Korea.<ref>Farris (1998), p. 105.</ref>

=== Shipbuilding === === Shipbuilding ===
Technicians sent from the Korean kingdom of Silla introduced advanced shipbuilding techniques to Japan for the first time.<ref name="koreanculture"/><ref name="kim"/> In the first half of the 9th century, when the private fleet of a Silla man, ] (張保皐), long resident in ], dominated the ] and maritime trade between China and Japan,<ref>Youngjoo Cho, "The Small but Magnificent Counter-Piracy Operations of the republic of Korea", in Myron H. Nordquist, John Norton Moore, Robert Beckman, Ronán Long (eds.), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2014 pp. 51–70</ref> the superiority of Korean shipbuilding technology was recognized by ], when as ambassador to China he chartered Korean vessels as more seaworthy for his embassy to the mainland in 838. A Japanese court edict issued in 839 ordered that Kyūshū construct a 'Silla ship', which were better that coping with stormy weather.<ref>]. in ''The Mariner's Mirror'', vol. 95, No. 3 August, 2009 pp. 260–283.</ref> Baekje may also have contributed shipbuilding technology to Japan.<ref name="pak"/> Technicians sent from the Korean kingdom of Silla introduced advanced shipbuilding techniques to Japan for the first time.<ref name="koreanculture"/><ref name="kim"/> In the first half of the 9th century, when the private fleet of a Silla man, ] (張保皐), long resident in ], dominated the ] and maritime trade between China and Japan,<ref>Cho, Youngjoo, .</ref> the superiority of Korean shipbuilding technology was recognized by ], when as ambassador to China he chartered Korean vessels as more seaworthy for his embassy to the mainland in 838. A Japanese court edict issued in 839 ordered that Kyūshū construct a 'Silla ship', which were better that coping with stormy weather.<ref>Sansom, .</ref><ref>Farris, in ''The Mariner's Mirror'', vol. 95, No. 3 August, 2009 pp. 260–283.</ref> Baekje may also have contributed shipbuilding technology to Japan.<ref name="pak"/>
=== Buddhism === === Buddhism ===
In the 500s the Korean state of Baekje launched a plan to culturally remake Japan in its own image.<ref name="culture">Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 439–440.</ref> It started in the years 513 and 516 when King Muryeong of Baekje dispatched scribes and Confucian scholars to Japan's Yamato court.<ref name="culture"/><ref name="shigeo">Kamata Shigeo, "The Transmission of Paekche Buddhism to Japan," in ''Introduction of Buddhism to Japan: New Cultural Patterns'', eds. Lewis R. Lancaster and CS Yu (Berkeley, California: Asian Humanities Press, 1989), 151–155.</ref> Later King Seong sent Buddhist sutras and a statue of Buddha to Japan, an event described by historian Robert Buswell as "one of the two most critical influences in the entire history of Japan, rivaled only by the nineteenth-century encounter with Western culture."<ref name="buswell">Robert Buswell Jr., "Patterns of Influence in East Asian Buddhism: The Korean Case", in ''Currents and Countercurrents: Korean Influences on the East Asian Buddhist Traditions'', ed. Robert Buswell (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2005), 2–4.</ref> The year this occurred, dated by historians to either 538 or 552, marks the official introduction of Buddhism into Japan, and within two years of this date Baekje provided Japan with nine Buddhists priests to aid in propagating the faith.<ref name="culture"/> In the 500s the Korean state of Baekje launched a plan to culturally remake Japan in its own image.<ref name="culture">Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 439–440.</ref> It started in the years 513 and 516 when King Muryeong of Baekje dispatched scribes and Confucian scholars to Japan's Yamato court.<ref name="culture"/><ref name="shigeo">Kamata, pp. 151–155.</ref> Later King Seong sent Buddhist sutras and a statue of Buddha to Japan, an event described by historian Robert Buswell as "one of the two most critical influences in the entire history of Japan, rivaled only by the nineteenth-century encounter with Western culture".<ref name="buswell">Buswell, pp. 2–4.</ref> The year this occurred, dated by historians to either 538 or 552, marks the official introduction of Buddhism into Japan, and within two years of this date Baekje provided Japan with nine Buddhists priests to aid in propagating the faith.<ref name="culture"/>
Baekje continued to supply Japan with Buddhist monks for the remainder of its existence. In 587 the monk P'ungguk arrived from Baekje to serve as a tutor to ]'s younger brother and later settled down as the first abbot of Japan's ].<ref name="shigeo"/> In 595 the monk ] arrived in Japan from Goguryeo.<ref name="best">Jonathan W. Best, "Paekche and the Incipiency of Buddhism in Japan," in ''Currents and Countercurrents: Korean Influences on the East Asian Buddhist Traditions'', ed. Robert Buswell (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2005), 31–34.</ref> He became a mentor to Prince Shotoku and lived in ].<ref name="best"/> By the reign of the Japanese ] (592-628), there were over one thousand monks and nuns living in Japan, a substantial percentage of whom were Korean.<ref name="shigeo"/>
A great many Buddhist writings published during Korea's ] (918–1392) were also highly influential upon their arrival in Japan.<ref name="goryeo">Hyoun-jun Lee, "Korean Influence on Japanese Culture (2)," ''Korean Frontier'', September 1970, 20, 31.</ref> Such Korean ideas would play an important role in the development of ]. The Japanese monk ] was among those known to be influenced by Korean Buddhism, particularly by the ] monk Gyeongheung.<ref name="buswell"/>
Baekje continued to supply Japan with Buddhist monks for the remainder of its existence. In 587 the monk P'ungguk arrived from Baekje to serve as a tutor to ]'s younger brother and later settled down as the first abbot of Japan's ].<ref name="shigeo"/> In 595 the monk ] arrived in Japan from Goguryeo.<ref name="best">Best, pp. 31–34.</ref> He became a mentor to Prince Shōtoku and lived in ].<ref name="best"/> By the reign of the Japanese ] (592–628), there were over one thousand monks and nuns living in Japan, a substantial percentage of whom were Korean.<ref name="shigeo"/>
Robert Buswell notes that the form of Buddhism Korea was propagating throughout its history was "a vibrant cultural tradition in its own right" and that Korea did not serve simply as a "bridge" between China and Japan.<ref name="buswell"/>
A great many Buddhist writings published during Korea's ] (918–1392) were also highly influential upon their arrival in Japan.<ref name="goryeo">Lee (September 1970), pp. 20, 31.</ref> Such Korean ideas would play an important role in the development of ]. The Japanese monk ] was among those known to be influenced by Korean Buddhism, particularly by the ]n monk Gyeongheung. Robert Buswell notes that the form of Buddhism Korea was propagating throughout its history was "a vibrant cultural tradition in its own right" and that Korea did not serve simply as a "bridge" between China and Japan.<ref name="buswell"/>

== Artistic influence == == Artistic influence ==
According to the scholar Insoo Cho, Korean artwork has had a "huge impact" on Japan throughout history, though until recently the subject was often neglected within academia.<ref>Insoo Cho, "Painters as Envoys: Korean Inspiration in Eighteenth Century Japanese Nanga (Review)", ''Journal of Korean Studies'', Fall 2007, 162.</ref> Beatrix von Ragué has noted that in particular, "one can hardly underestimate the role which, from the fifth to the seventh centuries, Korean artists and craftsmen played in the early art&nbsp;... of Japan."<ref name="lacquer">Beatrix von Ragué, ''A History of Japanese Lacquerwork'' (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976), 5–7.</ref> According to the scholar Insoo Cho, Korean artwork has had a "huge impact" on Japan throughout history, though until recently the subject was often neglected within academia.<ref>Cho, Insoo, p. 162.</ref> Beatrix von Ragué has noted that in particular, "one can hardly underestimate the role which, from the fifth to the seventh centuries, Korean artists and craftsmen played in the early art&nbsp;... of Japan."<ref name="lacquer">von Ragué, pp. 5–7.</ref>
=== Lacquerwork === === Lacquerwork ===
]
]The first Japanese lacquerwork was produced by or influenced by Korean and Chinese craftsmen in Japan. Most notably is ], a miniature shrine in Horyū-ji Temple, which was created in Korean style, possibly by a Korean immigrant to Japan. Tamamushi shrine, described by Beatrix von Ragué as "the oldest example of the true art of lacquerwork to have survived in Japan", is decorated with a uniquely-Korean inlay composed of the wings of ].<ref name="lacquer"/> ] has called Tamamushi shrine, one of the "great monuments of sixth-century Corean art".<ref name="fenollosa">Ernest Fenollosa, ''Epochs of Chinese and Japanese Art Volume One'' (New York: Frederick A. Stokes, 1912), 49–50.</ref>
The first Japanese lacquerwork was produced by or influenced by Korean and Chinese craftsmen in Japan. Most notably is ], a miniature shrine in Horyū-ji Temple, which was created in Korean style, possibly by a Korean immigrant to Japan. Tamamushi shrine, described by Beatrix von Ragué as "the oldest example of the true art of lacquerwork to have survived in Japan", is decorated with a uniquely Korean inlay composed of the wings of ].<ref name="lacquer"/> ] has called Tamamushi shrine, one of the "great monuments of sixth-century Corean art".<ref name="fenollosa">Fenollosa, pp. 49–50.</ref>
Japanese lacquerware teabowls, boxes, and tables of the ] (1568–1600) also show signs of Korean artistic influence. The mother-of-pearl inlay frequently used in this lacquerware is of clearly Korean origin.<ref name="lacquer1">Beatrix von Ragué, ''A History of Japanese Lacquerwork'' (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976), 176–179.</ref>
Japanese lacquerware teabowls, boxes, and tables of the ] (1568–1600) also show signs of Korean artistic influence. The mother-of-pearl inlay frequently used in this lacquerware is of clearly Korean origin.<ref name="lacquer1">von Ragué, pp. 176–179.</ref>

=== Painting === === Painting ===
The immigration of Korean and Chinese painters to Japan during the Asuka period transformed Japanese art.<ref name="akiyama">Terukazu Akiyama, ''Japanese Painting'' (New York: Rizzoli International Publications, 1977), 19–20, 26.</ref> For instance, in the year 610 ], a Buddhist monk from Goguryeo, brought paints, brushes, and paper to Japan.<ref name="akiyama"/> Damjing is credited with introducing the arts of papermaking and of preparing pigments to Japan for the first time,<ref name="hyoun">Hyoun-jun Lee, "Korean Influence on Japanese Culture (3)," ''Korean Frontier'', October 1970, 18, 33.</ref><ref name="akiyama"/><ref> ], ], Cambridge University Press, 1985 p.331.</ref><ref>], ], Cambridge University Press, 1965 p.401 and note g.</ref> and he is also regarded as the artist behind the wall painting in the main hall of Japan's Horyu-ji Temple which was later burned down in a fire.<ref>Song-nae Pak, ''Science and Technology in Korean History: Excursions, Innovations, and Issues'' (Fremont, California: Jain, 2005), 41.</ref> The immigration of Korean and Chinese painters to Japan during the Asuka period transformed Japanese art.<ref name="akiyama">Akiyama, pp. 19–20, 26.</ref> For instance, in the year 610 ], a Buddhist monk from Goguryeo, brought paints, brushes, and paper to Japan.<ref name="akiyama"/> Damjing is credited with introducing the arts of papermaking and of preparing pigments to Japan for the first time,<ref name="hyoun">Lee (October 1970), pp. 18, 33.</ref><ref name="akiyama"/><ref>Needham and Tsien, .</ref><ref>Needham and Wang, .</ref> and he is also regarded as the artist behind the wall painting in the main hall of Japan's Horyu-ji Temple which was later burned down in a fire.<ref>Pak, p. 41.</ref>
However, it was during the ] (1337–1573) of Japanese history that Korean influence on Japanese painting reached its peak. Korean art and artists frequently arrived on Japan's shores, influencing both the style and theme of Japanese ink painting. The two most important Japanese ink painters of the period were ], whose art displays many of the characteristic features of Korean painting, and Sumon, who was himself an immigrant from Korea. Consequently, one Japanese historian, Sokuro Wakimoto, has even described the period between 1394 and 1486 as the "Era of Korean Style" in Japanese ink painting.<ref name="ink">Ahn Hwi-Joon, "Korean Influence on Japanese Ink Paintings of the Muromachi Period", ''Korea Journal'', Winter 1997, 195–201.</ref> However, it was during the ] (1337–1573) of Japanese history that Korean influence on Japanese painting reached its peak. Korean art and artists frequently arrived on Japan's shores, influencing both the style and theme of Japanese ink painting. The two most important Japanese ink painters of the period were ], whose art displays many of the characteristic features of Korean painting, and Sumon, who was himself an immigrant from Korea. Consequently, one Japanese historian, Sokuro Wakimoto, has even described the period between 1394 and 1486 as the "Era of Korean Style" in Japanese ink painting.<ref name="ink">Ahn, pp. 195–201.</ref>
Then during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, as a result of the ], the Japanese artists who were developing ] came into close contact with Korean artists. Though Japanese nanga received inspiration from many sources, the historian Burglind Jungmann concludes that Korean namjonghwa painting "may well have been the most important for creating the Nanga style." It was the Korean brush and ink techniques in particular which are known to have had a significant impact on such Japanese painters as ], Gion Nankai, and Sakaki Hyakusen.<ref name="envoys">Burglind Jungmann, ''Painters as Envoys: Korean Inspiration in Eighteenth-Century Japanese Nanga'' (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), 205–211.</ref>
Then during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, as a result of the ], the Japanese artists who were developing ] came into close contact with Korean artists. Though Japanese nanga received inspiration from many sources, the historian Burglind Jungmann concludes that Korean namjonghwa painting "may well have been the most important for creating the Nanga style". It was the Korean brush and ink techniques in particular which are known to have had a significant impact on such Japanese painters as ], Gion Nankai, and Sakaki Hyakusen.<ref name="envoys">Jungmann, pp. 205–211.</ref>

=== Music and dance === === Music and dance ===
In ancient times the imperial court of Japan imported all its music from abroad, though it was Korean music that reached Japan first. The first Korean music may have infiltrated Japan as early as the third century. Korean court music in ancient Japan was at first called "sankangaku" in Japanese, referring to music from all the states of the Korean peninsula, but it was later termed "komagaku" in reference specifically to the court music of the Korean kingdom of Guguryeo.<ref name="music">William P. Malm, ''Traditional Japanese Music and Musical Instruments'' (New York: Kodansha International, 1959), 33, 98–100, 109.</ref> In ancient times the imperial court of Japan imported all its music from abroad, though it was Korean music that reached Japan first. The first Korean music may have infiltrated Japan as early as the third century. Korean court music in ancient Japan was at first called "sankangaku" in Japanese, referring to music from all the states of the Korean peninsula, but it was later termed "komagaku" in reference specifically to the court music of the Korean kingdom of Guguryeo.<ref name="music">Malm, pp. 33, 98–100, 109.</ref>
]Musicians from various Korean states often went to work in Japan.<ref name="music"/><ref name="culture"/> Mimaji, a Korean entertainer from Baekje, introduced Chinese dance and Chinese ] music to Japan in 612.<ref name="music"/><ref>Martin Banham, ''The Cambridge Guide to World Theatre'' (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 559.</ref> By the time of the ] (710-794), every musician in Japan's imperial court was either Korean or Chinese.<ref name="music"/> Korean musical instruments which became popular in Japan during this period include the flute known as the ], the zither known as the ], and the harp known as the shiragikoto.<ref name="koreanculture">Hyoun-jun Lee, "Korean Influence on Japanese Culture (1)," ''Korean Frontier'', August 1970, 12, 29.</ref><ref name="music"/> ]Musicians from various Korean states often went to work in Japan.<ref name="music"/><ref name="culture"/> Mimaji, a Korean entertainer from Baekje, introduced Chinese dance and Chinese ] music to Japan in 612.<ref name="music"/><ref>Banham, p. 559.</ref> By the time of the ] (710–794), every musician in Japan's imperial court was either Korean or Chinese.<ref name="music"/> Korean musical instruments which became popular in Japan during this period include the flute known as the ], the zither known as the ], and the harp known as the shiragikoto.<ref name="koreanculture">Lee (August 1970), pp. 12, 29.</ref><ref name="music"/>
Though much has been written about Korean influence on early Japanese court music, Taeko Kusano has stated that Korean influence on Japanese folk music during the ] (1603-1868) represents a very important but neglected field of study. According to Taeko Kusano, each of the Joseon missions to Japan included about fifty Korean musicians and left their mark on Japanese folk music. Most notably, the "tojin procession", which was practiced in ], the "tojin dance", which arose in modern-day ], and the "karako dance", which exists in modern-day ], all have Korean roots and utilize Korean-based music.<ref name="folk">Taeko Kusano, "Unknown Aspects of Korean Influence on Japanese Folk Music," ''Yearbook for Traditional Music'', 1983, 31-36.</ref> Though much has been written about Korean influence on early Japanese court music, Taeko Kusano has stated that Korean influence on Japanese folk music during the ] (1603–1868) represents a very important but neglected field of study. According to Taeko Kusano, each of the Joseon missions to Japan included about fifty Korean musicians and left their mark on Japanese folk music. Most notably, the "tojin procession", which was practiced in ], the "tojin dance", which arose in modern-day ], and the "karako dance", which exists in modern-day ], all have Korean roots and utilize Korean-based music.<ref name="folk">Kusano, pp. 31–36.</ref>
=== Silk weaving === === Silk weaving ===
Silk weaving took off in Japan from the fifth century onward as a result of new technology brought from Korea. Japan's Hata clan, who immigrated from Korea, are believed to have been specialists in the art of silk weaving and silk tapestry.<ref name="silk">Farris (1998), p. 97.</ref> According to William Wayne Farris, citing a leading Japanese expert on ancient cloth, the production of high-quality silk twill took off in Japan from the fifth century onward as a result of new technology brought from Korea.<ref name="silk">Farris (1998), p. 97.</ref> Farris argues that Japan's Hata clan, who are believed to have been specialists in the art of silk weaving and silk tapestry, immigrated to Japan from the region of the Korean peninsula.<ref name="silk"/> By contrast, historian ] believes that the Hata clan were of Chinese descent.<ref>Hsu, .</ref>

=== Jewelry === === Jewelry ===
Japan at first imported jewelry made of glass, gold, and silver from Korea, but in the fifth century the techniques of gold and silver metallurgy also entered Japan from Korea, possibly from the Korean states of Baekje and Gaya.<ref name="jewelry">Farris (1998), pp. 96, 118.</ref> Korean immigrants established important sites of jewelry manufacturing in ], ], and other places in Japan, allowing Japan to domestically produce its first gold and silver earrings, crowns, and beads.<ref name="other">Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 441, 443.</ref> Japan at first imported jewelry made of glass, gold, and silver from Korea, but in the fifth century the techniques of gold and silver metallurgy also entered Japan from Korea, possibly from the Korean states of Baekje and Gaya.<ref name="jewelry">Farris (1998), pp. 96, 118.</ref> Korean immigrants established important sites of jewelry manufacturing in ], ], and other places in Japan, allowing Japan to domestically produce its first gold and silver earrings, crowns, and beads.<ref name="other">Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 441, 443.</ref>
=== Sculpture === === Sculpture ===
Along with Buddhism, the art of Buddhism sculpture also spread to Japan from Korea. At first almost all Japanese Buddhist sculptures were imported from Korea, and these imports demonstrate an artistic style which would dominate Japanese sculpture during the ] (538-710).<ref name="donald">Donald McCallum, "Korean Influence on Early Japanese Buddhist Sculpture," ''Korean Culture'', March 1982, 22, 26, 28.</ref> In the years 577 and 588 the Korean state of Baekje dispatched to Japan expert statue sculptors.<ref>Farris (1998), pp. 102–103.</ref> Along with Buddhism, the art of Buddhist sculpture also spread to Japan from Korea. At first almost all Japanese Buddhist sculptures were imported from Korea, and these imports demonstrate an artistic style which would dominate Japanese sculpture during the ] (538–710).<ref name="donald">McCallum (1982), pp. 22, 26, 28.</ref> In the years 577 and 588 the Korean state of Baekje dispatched to Japan expert statue sculptors.<ref>Farris (1998), pp. 102–103.</ref>
]One of the most notable examples of Korean influence on Japanese sculpture is the Buddha statue in the ], sometimes referred to as the "Crown-Coiffed Maitreya".<ref name="maitreya">Jung Hyoun, "Who Made Japan's National Treasure No.1," in ''The Foreseen and the Unforeseen in Historical Relations Between Korea and Japan'', eds. Northeast Asian History Foundation (Seoul: Northeast Asian History Foundation, 2009), 113–114, 119.</ref> This statue, which has been described by Japan as its "National Treasure No.1", was directly copied from a Korean prototype around the seventh century.<ref name="donald"/><ref name="maitreya"/> Likewise, the Great Buddha sculpture of ],<ref name="pak"/><ref>Richard D. McBride, ''Domesticating the Dharma: Buddhist Cults and the Hwaom Synthesis in Silla Korea'' (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2008), 90.</ref><ref name="koreanculture"/> as well as both the ] and the ] sculptures of Japan's ], are believed to have been sculpted by Koreans.<ref name="fenollosa"/><ref>Jane Portal, ''Korea: Art and Archaeology'' (New York: Thames & Hudson, 2000), 52.</ref><ref name="koreanculture"/><ref>{{cite book |last=Bornoff |first=Nicholas |date=2008 |title=National Geographic Traveler: Japan (Third Edition) |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X1cLvsZ9t8kC&pg=PT217&dq=%22Kudara+Kannon%22+1949&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjk7JXZ97TMAhUDeCYKHeDMCgkQ6AEIJzAC#v=onepage&q=%22Kudara%20Kannon%22%201949&f=false |location=USA |publisher=National Geographic |page=247 |isbn=978-1426202346}}</ref> The Guze Kannon was described as "the greatest perfect monument of Corean art" by ].<ref name="fenollosa"/>
]
One of the most notable examples of Korean influence on Japanese sculpture is the Buddha statue in the ], sometimes referred to as the "Crown-Coiffed Maitreya".<ref name="maitreya">Jung, pp. 113–114, 119.</ref> This statue, which has been described{{who|date=June 2016}} by Japan as its "National Treasure No.&nbsp;1", was directly copied from a Korean prototype around the seventh century.<ref name="donald"/><ref name="maitreya"/> Likewise, the Great Buddha sculpture of ],<ref name="pak"/><ref>McBride, 90.</ref><ref name="koreanculture"/> as well as both the ] and the ] sculptures of Japan's ], are believed to have been sculpted by Koreans.<ref name="fenollosa"/><ref>Portal, 52.</ref><ref name="koreanculture"/> The Guze Kannon was described as "the greatest perfect monument of Corean art" by ].<ref name="fenollosa"/>

=== Mythology and literature === === Mythology and literature ===
Many Japanese myths about the age of the gods are believed by scholars including ] and ] to have their origins in Korean stories.<ref>Mikiso Hane, ''Premodern Japan: A Historical Survey'' (Boulder : Westview Press, 1991 Boulder: Westview Press, 1991), 23.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aad.berkeley.edu/uga/osl/mcnair/94BerkeleyMcNairJournal/07_Yoo.html |title=Foundation and Creation Myths in Korea and Japan: Patterns and Connections |author=Joo-Young Yoo |publisher=''McNair Journal'' |year=1994 |deadurl=unfit |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20030217053544/http://www.aad.berkeley.edu/uga/osl/mcnair/94BerkeleyMcNairJournal/07_Yoo.html |archivedate=February 17, 2003 }}</ref> Many Japanese myths about the age of the gods are believed by scholars including ] and ] to have their origins in Korean stories.<ref>Hane, p. 23.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aad.berkeley.edu/uga/osl/mcnair/94BerkeleyMcNairJournal/07_Yoo.html |title=Foundation and Creation Myths in Korea and Japan: Patterns and Connections |author=Joo-Young Yoo |publisher=''McNair Journal'' |year=1994 |deadurl=unfit |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20030217053544/http://www.aad.berkeley.edu/uga/osl/mcnair/94BerkeleyMcNairJournal/07_Yoo.html |archivedate=February 17, 2003 }}</ref>
Concerning literature, ] has stated that, "Japanese scholars have made important progress in identifying the seminal contributions of Korean immigrants, and of Korean literary culture as brought to Japan by the early Korean diaspora from the Old Korean kingdoms, to the formative stages of early Japanese poetic art".<ref>Roy Andrew Miller, "Plus Ça Change...," ''The Journal of Asian Studies'', August 1980, 776.</ref> ] has argued that Okura was born in the Korean kingdom of ] to a high court doctor and came with his émigré family to Yamato at the age of 3 after the collapse of that kingdom. It has been noted that the Korean genre of ], of which only 25<ref name="LeeRamsey" /> examples survive from the ] kingdom's Samdaemok (三代目), compiled in 888 CE., differ greatly in both form and theme from the Man'yō poems, with the single exception of some of Yamanoue no Okura's poetry which shares their Buddhist-philosophical thematics.<ref name="Levy" >], Princeton University Press, 1984 pp.42–43.</ref> Roy Andrew Miller, arguing that Okura's 'Korean ethnicity' is an established fact though one disliked by the Japanese literary establishment, speaks of his 'unique binational background and multilingual heritage'.<ref>Roy Andrew Miller, 'Uri Famëba,' in Stanca Scholz-Cionca (ed.), Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 1997 pp.85–104, pp.85–6, p.104.</ref>
Concerning literature, ] has stated that, "Japanese scholars have made important progress in identifying the seminal contributions of Korean immigrants, and of Korean literary culture as brought to Japan by the early Korean diaspora from the Old Korean kingdoms, to the formative stages of early Japanese poetic art".<ref>Miller (1980), p. 776.</ref> ] has argued that Okura was born in the Korean kingdom of ] to a high court doctor and came with his émigré family to Yamato at the age of 3 after the collapse of that kingdom. It has been noted that the Korean genre of ], of which only 25<ref name="LeeRamsey" /> examples survive from the ] kingdom's Samdaemok (三代目), compiled in 888 CE, differ greatly in both form and theme from the ''Man'yō'' poems, with the single exception of some of Yamanoue no Okura's poetry which shares their Buddhist-philosophical thematics.<ref name="Levy" >Levy, .</ref> Roy Andrew Miller, arguing that Okura's "Korean ethnicity" is an established fact though one disliked by the Japanese literary establishment, speaks of his "unique binational background and multilingual heritage".<ref>Miller (1997), .</ref>

=== Architecture === === Architecture ===
]
]William Wayne Farris has noted that "Architecture was one art that changed forever with the importation of Buddhism" from Korea.<ref name="asukadera">Farris (1998), p. 103.</ref> In 587 the Buddhist Soga clan took control of the Japanese government, and the very next year in 588 the kingdom of Baekje sent Japan two architects, one metal smith, four roof tilers, and one painter who were assigned the task of constructing Japan's first full-fledged Buddhist temple.<ref name="culture"/><ref>Mori Ikuo, "Korean Influence and Japanese Innovation in Tiles of the Asuka-Hakuho Period," in ''Transmitting the Forms of Divinity: Early Buddhist Art from Korea and Japan'', eds. Washizuka Hiromitsu, et al. (New York: Japan Society, 2003), 356.</ref> This temple was Asuka-dera Temple, completed in 596, and it was only the first of many such temples put together on the Baekje model.<ref name="culture"/> According to the historian Jonathan W. Best "virtually all of the numerous complete temples built in Japan between the last decade of the sixth and the middle of the seventh centuries" were designed off Korean models.<ref name="best"/> Among such early Japanese temples designed and built with Korean aid are Shitenno-ji Temple and Horyu-ji Temple.<ref name="asukadera"/>
William Wayne Farris has noted that "Architecture was one art that changed forever with the importation of Buddhism" from Korea.<ref name="asukadera">Farris (1998), p. 103.</ref> In 587 the Buddhist Soga clan took control of the Japanese government, and the very next year in 588 the kingdom of Baekje sent Japan two architects, one metal smith, four roof tilers, and one painter who were assigned the task of constructing Japan's first full-fledged Buddhist temple.<ref name="culture"/><ref>Mori, 356.</ref> This temple was Asuka-dera Temple, completed in 596, and it was only the first of many such temples put together on the Baekje model.<ref name="culture"/> According to the historian Jonathan W. Best "virtually all of the numerous complete temples built in Japan between the last decade of the sixth and the middle of the seventh centuries" were designed off Korean models.<ref name="best"/> Among such early Japanese temples designed and built with Korean aid are Shitennō-ji Temple and Hōryū-ji Temple.<ref name="asukadera"/>
Many of the temple bells were also of Korean design and origin. As late as the early eleventh century Korean bells were being delivered to many Japanese temples including ]. In the year 1921, eighteen Korean temple bells were designated as national treasures of Japan.<ref name="goryeo"/> Many of the temple bells were also of Korean design and origin. As late as the early eleventh century Korean bells were being delivered to many Japanese temples including ]. In the year 1921, eighteen Korean temple bells were designated as national treasures of Japan.<ref name="goryeo"/>
In addition to temples, starting from the sixth century advanced stonecutting technology entered Japan from Korea and as a result Japanese tomb construction also began to change in favor of Korean models.<ref name="other"/><ref>Farris, pp. 92–93.</ref> During this time Japan's famous ] gradually faded out of existence and were replaced by the corridor tombs prevalent in Baekje.<ref name="other"/> In addition to temples, starting from the sixth century advanced stonecutting technology entered Japan from Korea and as a result Japanese tomb construction also began to change in favor of Korean models.<ref name="other"/><ref>Farris, pp. 92–93.</ref> During this time Japan's famous ] gradually faded out of existence and were replaced by the corridor tombs prevalent in Baekje.<ref name="other"/>
== Cultural transfers during Hideyoshi's invasions of Korea == == Cultural transfers during Hideyoshi's invasions of Korea ==
The invasions of Korea by Japanese leader ] between 1592 and 1598 were an extremely vigorous period of two-way cross-cultural transfer between Korea and Japan. Although Japan ultimately lost the war, Hideyoshi and his generals used the opportunity to loot valuable commodities from Korea and to kidnap skilled Korean craftsmen and take them back to Japan. ] summed up the conflict by saying that, "While neither Japan nor Choson gained any advantages from this war, Japan gained cultural benefits from the importation of moveable type printing, technological benefits from ceramics, and diplomatic benefits from its contact with Ming China."<ref>Ha, 335.</ref> The invasions of Korea by Japanese leader ] between 1592 and 1598 were an extremely vigorous period of two-way cross-cultural transfer between Korea and Japan. Although Japan ultimately lost the war, Hideyoshi and his generals used the opportunity to loot valuable commodities from Korea and to kidnap skilled Korean craftsmen and take them back to Japan. ] summed up the conflict by saying that, "While neither Japan nor Choson gained any advantages from this war, Japan gained cultural benefits from the importation of moveable type printing, technological benefits from ceramics, and diplomatic benefits from its contact with Ming China."<ref>Ha, p. 335.</ref>
=== Printing technology and books === === Printing technology and books ===
At the start of the invasion in 1592 Korean books and book printing technology were one of Japan's top priorities for looting, especially ]. One commander alone, ], is said to have had 200,000 printing types and books removed from Korea's Gyeongbokgung Palace. The printing types remained in use in Japan for many decades and the books were numerous enough to fill many libraries. According to the historian Ha Woo Bong, "metal and wood moveable types looted from Choson became catalysts for the development of printing technology and scholarship in the Edo period."<ref>Ha, 328–329.</ref> At the start of the invasion in 1592 Korean books and book printing technology were one of Japan's top priorities for looting, especially ]. One commander alone, ], is said to have had 200,000 printing types and books removed from Korea's Gyeongbokgung Palace. The printing types remained in use in Japan for many decades and the books were numerous enough to fill many libraries. According to the historian Ha Woo Bong, "metal and wood moveable types looted from Choson became catalysts for the development of printing technology and scholarship in the Edo period."<ref>Ha, pp. 328–329.</ref>
=== Ceramics === === Ceramics ===
Prior to the invasion, Korea's high-quality ceramic pottery was prized in Japan, particularly the Korean teabowls used in the ].<ref>Jane Portal, ''Korea: Art and Archaeology'' (New York: Thames & Hudson, 2000), 140–141.</ref> Because of this, Japanese soldiers made great efforts to find skilled Korean potters and transfer them to Japan.<ref name="satsuma">Ha, 330–331.</ref> For this reason, the Japanese invasion of Korea is sometimes referred to as the "Teabowl War"<ref name="maske"/> or the "Pottery War".<ref name="teabowl">{{cite web|url=http://www.koreafocus.or.kr/design2/layout/content_print.asp?group_id=102438|title=Flowering of Korean Ceramic Culture in Japan|author=Koo Tae-hoon|publisher=''Korea Focus''|date=2008}}</ref> Prior to the invasion, Korea's high-quality ceramic pottery was prized in Japan, particularly the Korean teabowls used in the ].<ref>Portal, pp. 140–141.</ref> Because of this, Japanese soldiers made great efforts to find skilled Korean potters and transfer them to Japan.<ref name="satsuma">Ha, pp. 330–331.</ref> For this reason, the Japanese invasion of Korea is sometimes referred to as the "Teabowl War"<ref name="maske"/> or the "Pottery War".<ref name="teabowl">{{cite web|url=http://www.koreafocus.or.kr/design2/layout/content_print.asp?group_id=102438|title=Flowering of Korean Ceramic Culture in Japan|author=Koo Tae-hoon|publisher=''Korea Focus''|date=2008}}</ref>
Hundreds of Korean potters were taken by the Japanese Army back to Japan with them, either being forcibly kidnapped or else being persuaded to leave. Once settled in Japan, the Korean potters were put to work making ceramics.<ref name="teabowl"/> Historian Andrew Maske has concluded that, "Without a doubt the single most important development in Japanese ceramics in the past five hundred years was the importation of Korean ceramic technology as a result of the invasions of Korea by the Japanese under Toyotomi Hideyoshi."<ref name="maske">Andrew Maske, "The Continental Origins of Takatori Ware: The Introduction of Korean Potters and Technology to Japan Through the Invasions of 1592-1598," ''Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan'', 1994, 43.</ref> ], ], ], ], and ] were all pioneered by Koreans who came to Japan at this time.<ref name="satsuma"/> Hundreds of Korean potters were taken by the Japanese Army back to Japan with them, either being forcibly kidnapped or else being persuaded to leave. Once settled in Japan, the Korean potters were put to work making ceramics.<ref name="teabowl"/> Historian Andrew Maske has concluded that, "Without a doubt the single most important development in Japanese ceramics in the past five hundred years was the importation of Korean ceramic technology as a result of the invasions of Korea by the Japanese under Toyotomi Hideyoshi."<ref name="maske">Maske, p. 43.</ref> ], ], ], ], and ] were all pioneered by Koreans who came to Japan at this time.<ref name="satsuma"/>
=== Construction === === Construction ===
Line 130: Line 132:
=== Neo-Confucianism === === Neo-Confucianism ===
], a Korean ] scholar, was kidnapped in Korea by Japanese soldiers and taken to Japan.<ref name="hang">Ha, 324–325.</ref> He lived in Japan until the year 1600 during which time he formed an acquaintance with the scholar ] and instructed him in neo-Confucian philosophy.<ref name="hang"/><ref name="hyoun"/> Some historians believe that other Korean neo-Confucianists such as ] also had a major impact on Japanese neo-Confucianism at this time.<ref>Edward Chung, ''The Korean Neo-Confucianism of Yi Tʻoegye and Yi Yulgok'' (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995), 22.</ref><ref>Marius Jansen, ''The Making of Modern Japan'' (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press, 2000), 70.</ref><ref name="hyoun"/> The idea was developed in particular by Abe Yoshio (阿部吉雄).<ref> Tokyo Daigaku Shuppansha, 1965</ref><ref>Mary Evelyn Tucker, ),'' SUNY Press, 1989 p.68</ref> One Korean official visiting Japan in 1719 reported that "Of all the books by Korean scholars, the Japanese most respect the works of Yi Toe-gye."<ref>Seizaburo Sato, "Response to the West: The Korean and Japanese Patterns'', ed. Albert M Craig (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979), 293.</ref> ], a Korean ] scholar, was kidnapped in Korea by Japanese soldiers and taken to Japan.<ref name="hang">Ha, pp. 324–325.</ref> He lived in Japan until the year 1600 during which time he formed an acquaintance with the scholar ] and instructed him in neo-Confucian philosophy.<ref name="hang"/><ref name="hyoun"/> Some historians believe that other Korean neo-Confucianists such as ] also had a major impact on Japanese neo-Confucianism at this time.<ref>Chung, p. 22.</ref><ref>Jansen, p. 70.</ref><ref name="hyoun"/> The idea was developed in particular by Abe Yoshio (阿部吉雄).<ref>Tucker, .</ref> One Korean official visiting Japan in 1719 reported that "Of all the books by Korean scholars, the Japanese most respect the works of Yi Toe-gye."<ref>Sato, p. 293.</ref>
By contrast, Willem van Boot called this theory in question in his 1982 doctoral thesis and later works.<ref>James B. Lewis, Routledge, 2005 p.252 n.10</ref> Jurgis Elisonas wrote that the theory has been "rebutted convincingly".<ref>Jurgis Elisonas, "The Inseparable Trinity: Japan's Relations with China and Korea," in ''The Cambridge History of Japan Volume Four'', ed. John Whitney Hall (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 108.</ref> By contrast, Willem van Boot called this theory in question in his 1982 doctoral thesis and later works.<ref>Lewis, .</ref> Jurgis Elisonas wrote that the theory has been "rebutted convincingly".<ref>Elisonas, p. 108.</ref>
== Korean influence on Japanese culture today ==
In the past many historians emphasized only China's influence on Japanese culture and ignored Korea. Recently, however, this situation has changed and a growing consensus has been reached among historians on the importance of direct cultural transfers from Korea to Japan.<ref>Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 404–406.</ref> Even so, the issue of Korean influence on Japanese culture has continued to be a sensitive matter to discuss.<ref name="tomb">Farris (1998), 56.</ref> The excavation of many of Japan's earliest imperial tombs, which might shed important light on the subject, remains prohibited by the Japanese government.<ref name="tomb"/> By contrast, the admission by ] that the Imperial Family of Japan included Korean ancestors helped to improve bilateral Korea-Japan relations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Reln275/Jap-Kor-art.htm|title=Japanese Art and Its Korean Secret|author=Holland Cotter|publisher=''The New York Times''|date=April 6, 2003}}</ref> Recently, the Kyoto Cultural Museum has stated that, "In seeking the source of Japan’s ancient culture many will look to China, but the quest will finally lead to Korea, where China’s advanced culture was accepted and assimilated. In actuality, the people who crossed the sea were the people of the Korea Peninsula and their culture was the Korean culture."<ref>Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, p. 405.</ref>
Meanwhile Korea continues to exert cultural influence on Japan in some fields like food and music.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://travel.cnn.com/tokyo/life/japans-anti-korea-protests-lessons-monty-python-689826|title=Japan's anti-Korea protests: Lessons from Python|author=Richard Smart|publisher=''CNN''|date=October 3, 2011}}</ref> Korean ] and ] have become popular in Japan and some Koreans even see Japan's veneration of Korean K-pop idols as being an acknowledgement by Japan of the dominant role Korea has played in influencing Japanese culture since ancient times.<ref>Eun Mee Kim and Jiwon Ryoo, "South Korean Culture Goes Global: K-Pop and the Korean Wave," ''Korean Social Science Journal'', 2007, 143.</ref>
== Historiography ==
The interpretation of the history of early contacts, and the nature of the relations, between Japan and the states of the Korean peninsula has long been complicated by reciprocal nationalisms which skew interpretations.<ref>Em, .</ref><ref name="pai"/> In the modern period, especially in the wake of Japan's annexation of Korea, a Tokugawa era theory developed which held that in antiquity Japan had ruled over Korea and its elites, and that the roots of the two people and polities were identical. This was called the "common ancestry theory" (''naisen dōsoron'':内鮮同祖論) and, based on early texts that spoke of Yamato invasions of the peninsula and the establishment of ], was used to justify Japan's colonial seizure of Korea (''seikanron'':征韓論) as was evidence from excavations at the ] that ancient Korea had been long been a colonized country.<ref>Xu, .</ref> In this perspective, while recognizing the great impact of Chinese civilization on both polities, the role of Korean peninsular peoples in the transmission of Sinic culture was underplayed and it was claimed that Japan had retained its indigenous uniqueness by consistently modifying the cultural elements flowing through Korea to Yamato.<ref>Ebrey and Walthall, .</ref> Korean nationalist historiography (''minjok sahak'') challenged Japanese versions of their history while often adopting the same prejudices, and asserted in turn, the country had national sovereignty in prehistoric times, and a racial and cultural superiority over other east Asian countries, reflecting the legacy of colonial Japan’s own prejudices.<ref name="pai">Pai, .</ref><ref>Shin, :’the Japanese influenced Korean nationalist thinking&nbsp;... The search for documentation of the unique and immutable core-the racial origins-of the Korean people appears similar to the Japanese obsession with the national essence (''kokutai'') in the 1930s.'</ref>

Recently, a growing consensus has been reached among historians on the importance of direct cultural transfers from Korea to Japan.<ref>Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 404–406.</ref> However, the issue of Korean influence on Japanese culture continues to be a sensitive matter to discuss. The excavation of many of Japan's earliest imperial tombs, which might shed important light on the subject, remains prohibited by the Japanese government.<ref name="tomb">Farris (1998), p. 56.</ref> By contrast, the admission by ] that the Imperial Family of Japan included Korean ancestors helped to improve bilateral Korea-Japan relations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Reln275/Jap-Kor-art.htm|title=Japanese Art and Its Korean Secret|author=Holland Cotter|publisher=''The New York Times''|date=April 6, 2003}}</ref> Recently, the Kyoto Cultural Museum has stated that, "In seeking the source of Japan’s ancient culture many will look to China, but the quest will finally lead to Korea, where China's advanced culture was accepted and assimilated. In actuality, the people who crossed the sea were the people of the Korea Peninsula and their culture was the Korean culture."<ref>Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, p. 405.</ref>

== See also == == See also ==

*] *]
*] *]
*] *]

== Notes == == Notes ==

{{Reflist}} {{Reflist}}

== Bibliography == == Bibliography ==

*Ahn Hwi-Joon, "Korean Influence on Japanese Ink Paintings of the Muromachi Period", ''Korea Journal'', Winter 1997.
*Akiyama, Terukazu, ''Japanese Painting''. New York: Rizzoli International Publications, 1977.
*Banham, Martin, ''The Cambridge Guide to World Theatre''. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
*Batten, Bruce, ''Gateway to Japan: Hakata in War And Peace, 500-1300''. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2006.
*Bentley, John R., ''A Descriptive Grammar of Early Old Japanese Prose''. Boston: BRILL, 2001.
*Best, Jonathan W., "Paekche and the Incipiency of Buddhism in Japan", in ''Currents and Countercurrents: Korean Influences on the East Asian Buddhist Traditions'', ed. Robert Buswell. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2005.
*Buswell Jr., Robert, "Patterns of Influence in East Asian Buddhism: The Korean Case", in ''Currents and Countercurrents: Korean Influences on the East Asian Buddhist Traditions'', ed. Robert Buswell. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2005.
*Chung, Edward, ''The Korean Neo-Confucianism of Yi T'oegye and Yi Yulgok''. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.
*Cho, Insoo , "Painters as Envoys: Korean Inspiration in Eighteenth Century Japanese Nanga (Review)", ''Journal of Korean Studies'', Fall 2007.
*Cho, Youngjoo , "The Small but Magnificent Counter-Piracy Operations of the republic of Korea", in ''Freedom of Navigation and Globalization'', eds. Myron H. Nordquist, John Norton Moore, Robert Beckman, and Ronan Long. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff Publishers, 2014.
*Ch'on Kwan-u, "A New Interpretation of the Problems of Mimana (I)". ''Korea Journal'', February 1974.
*Comoe, Michael, ''Shotoku: Ethnicity, Ritual, and Violence in the Japanese Buddhist Tradition''. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).
*Ebrey, Patricia Buckley and Walthall, Anne, ''East Asia: A Cultural, Social, and Political History''. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2013.
*Elisonas, Jurgis, "The Inseparable Trinity: Japan's Relations with China and Korea", in ''The Cambridge History of Japan Volume Four'', ed. John Whitney Hall. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
*Em, Henry, ''The Great Enterprise: Sovereignty and Historiography in Modern Korea, Part 2''. London: Duke University Press, 2013.
*Farris, William Wayne, ''Sacred Texts and Buried Treasures: Issues in the Historical Archaeology of Ancient Japan''. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1998. *Farris, William Wayne, ''Sacred Texts and Buried Treasures: Issues in the Historical Archaeology of Ancient Japan''. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1998.
*Farris, William Wayne, ''Japan to 1600: A Social and Economic History''. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2009.
*Ha Woo Bong, "War and Cultural Exchange," in ''The East Asian War, 1592–1598'', eds. James B. Lewis. New York: Routledge, 2015.
*Fenollosa, Ernest, ''Epochs of Chinese and Japanese Art Volume One''. New York: Frederick A. Stokes, 1912.
*Rhee, Song-Nai, Aikens, C. Melvin, Choi, Sung-Rak, and Ro, Hyuk-Jin, ''Korean Contributions to Agriculture, Technology, and State Formation in Japan''. Asian Perspectives, Fall 2007.
*Frellesvig, Bjarke, ''A History of the Japanese Language''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
*Grayson, James H., ''Korea - A Religious History''. New York: Routledge, 2013.
*Ha Woo Bong, "War and Cultural Exchange", in ''The East Asian War, 1592–1598'', eds. James B. Lewis. New York: Routledge, 2015.
*Hane, Mikiso, ''Premodern Japan: A Historical Survey''. Boulder: Westview Press, 1991.
*Henshall, Kenneth G, ''A History of Japan: From Stone Age to Superpower''. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1999.
*Hsu, Cho-yun, ''China: A New Cultural History''. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.
*Jansen, Marius, ''The Making of Modern Japan''. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press, 2000.
*Jung Hyoun, "Who Made Japan's National Treasure No. 1", in ''The Foreseen and the Unforeseen in Historical Relations Between Korea and Japan'', eds. Northeast Asian History Foundation. Seoul: Northeast Asian History Foundation, 2009.
*Jungmann, Burglind, ''Painters as Envoys: Korean Inspiration in Eighteenth-Century Japanese Nanga''. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
*Kamata Shigeo, "The Transmission of Paekche Buddhism to Japan", in ''Introduction of Buddhism to Japan: New Cultural Patterns'', eds. Lewis R. Lancaster and CS Yu. Berkeley, California: Asian Humanities Press, 1989.
*Kamstra, Jacques H., ''Encounter Or Syncretism: The Initial Growth of Japanese Buddhism''. Leiden: Brill, 1967.
*Keller, Agathe, and Volkov, Alexei, "Mathematics Education in Oriental Antiquity and Medieval Ages", in ''Handbook on the History of Mathematics Education'', eds. Alexander Karp and Gert Schubring. New York: Springer, 2014.
*Kim, Eun Mee and Ryoo, Jiwon, "South Korean Culture Goes Global: K-Pop and the Korean Wave," ''Korean Social Science Journal'', 2007.
*Kim, Jinwung, ''A History of Korea: From 'Land of the Morning Calm' to States in Conflict''. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012.
*Kusano, Taeko, "Unknown Aspects of Korean Influence on Japanese Folk Music", ''Yearbook for Traditional Music'', 1983.
*Lee, Hyoun-jun, "Korean Influence on Japanese Culture (1)", ''Korean Frontier'', August 1970.
*Lee, Hyoun-jun, "Korean Influence on Japanese Culture (2)", ''Korean Frontier'', September 1970.
*Lee, Hyoun-jun, "Korean Influence on Japanese Culture (3)", ''Korean Frontier'', October 1970.
*Lee, Ki-Moon, and Ramsey, S. Robert, ''A History of the Korean Language''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
*], ''Hitomaro and the Birth of Japanese Lyricism''. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984.
*Lewis, James B., ''Frontier Contact Between Choson Korea and Tokugawa Japan''. New York: Routledge, 2005.
*], and ], ''Celestial Lancets: A History and Rationale of Acupuncture and Moxa''. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
*Malm, William P., ''Traditional Japanese Music and Musical Instruments''. New York: Kodansha International, 1959.
*Maske, Andrew, "The Continental Origins of Takatori Ware: The Introduction of Korean Potters and Technology to Japan Through the Invasions of 1592–1598", ''Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan'', 1994.
*McBride, Richard D., ''Domesticating the Dharma: Buddhist Cults and the Hwaom Synthesis in Silla Korea''. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2008.
*McCallum, Donald, "Korean Influence on Early Japanese Buddhist Sculpture," ''Korean Culture'', March 1982.
*McCallum, Donald, ''The Four Great Temples: Buddhist Archaeology, Architecture, and Icons of Seventh-Century Japan''. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2009).
*Miller, Roy Andrew, "Uri Famëba", in ''Wasser-Spuren: Festschrift für Wolfram Naumann zum 65. Geburtstag'', ed. Stanca Scholz-Cionca. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 1997.
*Miller, Roy Andrew, "Plus Ça Change...", ''The Journal of Asian Studies'', August 1980.
*Miyake, Marc Hideo, ''Old Japanese: A Phonetic Reconstruction''. New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003.
*Mori Ikuo, "Korean Influence and Japanese Innovation in Tiles of the Asuka-Hakuho Period", in ''Transmitting the Forms of Divinity: Early Buddhist Art from Korea and Japan'', eds. Washizuka Hiromitsu, et al. New York: Japan Society, 2003.
*Needham, Joseph, and ], ''Science and Civilisation in China: Volume 5, Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Part 1, Paper and Printing''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
*Needham, Joseph, and ], ''Science and Civilisation in China: Volume 4, Physics and Physical Technology, Part 2, Mechanical Engineering''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.
*Pai, Hyung Il, ''Constructing "Korean" Origins: A Critical Review of Archaeology, Historiography, and Racial Myth in Korean State-formation Theories''. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center, 2000.
*Pak, Song-nae, ''Science and Technology in Korean History: Excursions, Innovations, and Issues''. Fremont, California: Jain, 2005.
*Portal, Jane, ''Korea: Art and Archaeology''. New York: Thames & Hudson, 2000.
*Rhee, Song-Nai, Aikens, C. Melvin, Choi, Sung-Rak, and Ro, Hyuk-Jin, "Korean Contributions to Agriculture, Technology, and State Formation in Japan". '']'', Fall 2007.
*Rosner, Erhard, ''Medizingeschichte Japans''. Leiden: BRILL, 1988.
*]. ''A History of Japan''. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958.
*Sato, Seizaburo, "Response to the West: The Korean and Japanese Patterns'', ed. Albert M Craig. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.
*Seeley, Christopher, ''A History of Writing in Japan''. New York: EJ Brill, 1991.
*Shin, Gi-Wook, ''Ethnic Nationalism in Korea: Genealogy, Politics, and Legacy''. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006.
*Tokyo National Museum, ''Pageant of Japanese Art: Textiles and Lacquer''. Tokyo: Toto Bunka, 1952.
*Totman, Conrad, ''Japan: An Environmental History''. London: IB Tauris, 2014.
*Tucker, Mary Evelyn, ''Moral and Spiritual Cultivation in Japanese Neo-Confucianism: The Life and Thought of Kaibara Ekken (1630–1714)''. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1989.
*von Ragué, Beatrix, ''A History of Japanese Lacquerwork''. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976.
*Xu, Stella, ''Reconstructing Ancient Korean History: The Formation of Korean-ness in the Shadow of History ''. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2016.

== External links == == External links ==
* {{cite web|publisher=BC Culture |url=http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/08/11/090643.php |title=Review: Brighter than Gold - A Japanese Ceramic Tradition Formed by Foreign Aesthetics |author=Purple Tigress |accessdate=2008-01-10 |deadurl=unfit |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080118054520/http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/08/11/090643.php |archivedate=January 18, 2008 }}. * {{cite web|publisher=BC Culture |url=http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/08/11/090643.php |title=Review: Brighter than Gold A Japanese Ceramic Tradition Formed by Foreign Aesthetics |author=Purple Tigress |accessdate=2008-01-10 |deadurl=unfit |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080118054520/http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/08/11/090643.php |archivedate=January 18, 2008 }}
* {{cite web|url=http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ht/08/eaj/ht08eaj.htm |title=Japan, 1400–1600 A.D. |publisher=] |date=October 2002 |accessdate=2010-02-15 |deadurl=unfit |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080318162403/http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ht/08/eaj/ht08eaj.htm |archivedate=March 18, 2008 }} * {{cite web|url=http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ht/08/eaj/ht08eaj.htm |title=Japan, 1400–1600 A.D. |publisher=] |date=October 2002 |accessdate=2010-02-15 |deadurl=unfit |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080318162403/http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ht/08/eaj/ht08eaj.htm |archivedate=March 18, 2008 }}
* {{cite web|url=http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/yayo/hd_yayo.htm |title=Yayoi Culture (ca. 4th century B.C.–3rd century A.D.) |publisher=]| accessdate=2010-02-15}} * {{cite web|url=http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/yayo/hd_yayo.htm |title=Yayoi Culture (ca. 4th century B.C.–3rd century A.D.) |publisher=]| accessdate=2010-02-15}}
Line 159: Line 226:
* {{cite web|publisher=japan-guide.com|title=Japanese History: Jomon, Yayoi, Kofun: Early Japan (until 710)|url=http://www.japan-guide.com/e/e2131.html|accessdate=2010-02-15|ref=JapanGuide}} * {{cite web|publisher=japan-guide.com|title=Japanese History: Jomon, Yayoi, Kofun: Early Japan (until 710)|url=http://www.japan-guide.com/e/e2131.html|accessdate=2010-02-15|ref=JapanGuide}}
* {{cite news|newspaper=New York Times, The|title=Japan and Korean Influences.|date=1901-07-07|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9A05E0D91139E733A25754C0A9619C946097D6CF|at=Magazine supplement}} (first paragraph only. PDF scan of full article here: ) * {{cite news|newspaper=New York Times, The|title=Japan and Korean Influences.|date=1901-07-07|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9A05E0D91139E733A25754C0A9619C946097D6CF|at=Magazine supplement}} (first paragraph only. PDF scan of full article here: )
]
]
]

Revision as of 23:04, 23 June 2016

Korean influence on Japanese culture refers to the impact of continental Asian influences transmitted through or originating in the Korean Peninsula on Japanese institutions, culture, language and society. Since the Korean Peninsula was the cultural bridge between Japan and the Asian continent throughout much of Far Eastern history, these influences have been detected in a variety of aspects of Japanese culture. Korea played a significant role in the introduction of Buddhism to Japan from India via the Kingdom of Baekje. The modulation of continental styles of art in Korea has also been discerned in early Japanese painting and architecture, ranging from the design of Buddhist temples to smaller objects such as statues, textiles and ceramics. The role of ancient Korean states in the transmission of continental civilization, often moulded in turn by peninsular innovations, has long been neglected, and is increasingly the object of academic study.

Prehistoric contacts and the Jomon-Yayoi transition

Prior to 400 BC, around the start of Japan's Yayoi period, Korean technology and cultural objects suddenly began appearing in Japan. According to the opinion of the scholars C. Melvin Aikens, Sung-Rak Choi, Hyuk-Jin Ro, and Song-Nai Rhee, it was at this time that the forms of intensive agriculture and animal husbandry practiced in Korea were adopted in Japan, first in Kyushu which is closest to the Korean peninsula and soon all across Japan. The result was a major explosion in the Japanese population during the Yayoi period and subsequent Kofun period. Japanese people also began to use metal tools, arrowheads, new forms of pottery, beads, moats, burial mounds, and styles of housing which were of peninsular origin.

The cause of these dramatic changes in Japanese society was a massive influx of Korean peninsular immigrants, most of whom were men who married women native to Japan. The Yoshinogari site, a famous archeological site in Kyushu dating from the late Yayoi period, appears virtually identical to villages in the Korean peninsula of the same period.

Throughout the remainder of the Yayoi period Japan relied heavily on Korea as a source of tools and weapons made of bronze and iron. During this period Japan imported great numbers of peninsular mirrors and daggers, which were the symbols of power in Korea. Combined with the curved jewel known as the magatama, Korea's "three treasures" soon became as prized by Japan's elites as Korea's, and in Japan they would later become the Imperial Regalia.

Korean peninsular influences on ancient and classical Japan

During the Kofun period of ancient Japanese history, which begins around 250 AD, the tribes of Japan gradually coalesced into a centralized state. For Hyung Il Pai, there was no clear Korean and Japanese national distinction as for the period around the 4th century CE., and that archaeological and material similarities between the two cannot be explained in terms of domination or conquest.With the beginning of the Kofun period around 250 CE, gigantic tomb-building indicates the emergence of powerful warrior elites, fueled by more intensive agriculture and the introduction of iron technologies. Contact with the continental mainland increased, as Japan undertook intensive contacts with the southern Korean littoral ruling groups, in pursuit of securing supplies of iron and other material goods, while sending emissaries to China (in 238, 243 and 247). A pattern developed of intense military and political dealings with peninsula Korean powers that was to continue for four centuries. Korean peninsular technology and cultural objects suddenly began appearing in Japan. It is unknown whether family and linguistic relations underlay these contacts, but over time, peoples from the mainland would emigrate or seek refuge in Japan, and their presence would play an important role in the institutional and cultural developments of the Japanese archipelago. Japanese people also began to use metal tools, arrowheads, new forms of pottery, beads, moats, burial mounds, and styles of housing which were of Korean peninsular origin.

Cultural contact with Korea, which at the time was divided into several independent states, played a decisive role in the development of Japanese government and society both during the Kofun period and the subsequent Classical period. Most new innovations flowed from Korea into Japan, and not vice-versa, primarily due to Korea's closer proximity to China. Though many of the ideas and technologies which filtered into Japan from Korea were originally Chinese, historian William Wayne Farris notes that Korean peninsular peoples put "their distinctive stamp on" them before passing them on to Japan. Some such innovations were imported to Japan through trade, but in more cases they were brought to Japan by peninsular immigrants. The Yamato state that eventually unified Japan was able to accomplish this feat partly due to its success at gaining a monopoly on the importation of Korean peninsular culture and technology into Japan. According to Farris, Japanese cultural borrowing from Korea "hit peaks in the mid-fifth, mid-sixth, and late seventh centuries" and "helped to define a material culture that lasted as long as a thousand years."

Immigration from the Korean peninsular to Japan

Throughout much of ancient Japanese history Korea was divided into several warring kingdoms

During this period a major factor behind the transfer of peninsular Korean culture to Japan was immigration from Korea. Most peninsular immigrants, generically known as toraijin( 渡来人) in Japanese, came during a period of intense regional warfare which racked the Korean peninsula between the years 371 and 670. Japanese traditions held that the Yamato kingdom has sent military expeditions to assist Baekje as early as 369 CE, military aid that is said to have enabled the latter to secure control of Naktong against its enemies, Silla and Goguryeo. Most of these immigrants were from Japan's allies, the peninsular states of Baekje and Gaya, and they were welcomed by the Japanese government. Perhaps most significant of all was the flight of the Baekje elite, which is said to have come to Japan in two waves in 400 and 475 during successive invasions of Baekje by the Goguryeo and then again in 663 after Baekje fell to the kingdom of Silla. These refugees brought their culture to Japan with them, and once there they often became leading officials, soldiers, artists, and craftsmen. Korean peninsular immigrants played a significant role in Japan's cultural missions to Sui China. and some peninsular families are even said to have married into the Imperial Family.

By 700, it has been conjectured, perhaps one third of all Japanese aristocrats may have been of relatively recent peninsular origin, including the influential Aya clan. Although peninsular immigrants settled throughout Japan, they were especially concentrated in Nara, the region where the Japanese capital was located. According to one estimate, from 80 to 90 percent of people in Nara had Baekje ancestry by the year 773, and recent anatomical analyses indicate that modern-day Japanese people living in this area continue to be more closely related to ethnic Koreans than any other in Japan.

The Soga clan, a clan with close ties to the Baekje elite, may also have been of Baekje ancestry. Scholars who have argued in favor of the theory that the Soga had peninsular ancestry include Song-Nai Rhee, C. Melvin Aikens, Sung-Rak Choi, Hyuk-Jin Ro, Teiji Kadowaki, and William Wayne Farris.

Arms and armament

During most of the Kofun period Japan relied on Korea as its sole source of iron swords, spears, armor, and helmets. Cuirasses and later Japan's first lamellar armor, as well as subsequent innovations in producing them, arrived in Japan from Korea, particularly from Silla and Gaya. Japan's first crossbow was delivered by Goguryeo in 618.

At a time in history when horses were a key military weapon, Baekje immigrants also established Japan's first horse-raising farms in what would become Japan's Kawachi Province. One historian, Koichi Mori, theorizes that Emperor Keitai's close friendships with Baekje horsemen played an important role in helping him to assume the throne. Japan's first horse carriages and other trappings, such as bits, stirrups, saddles, and bridles were also imported from the peninsula by the early fifth century.

In 660 following the fall its ally, Baekje, the Japanese Emperor Tenji utilized Baekje's skilled technicians to construct at least seven fortresses to protect Japan's coastline from invasion. Japan's mountain fortifications in particular were based on peninsular models.

Pottery

Sue ware

Japan continued to import or native potters imitated new forms of pottery from Korea just as it had during the earlier Yayoi period, and around the early fifth century the tunnel kiln and potter's wheel also made their way to Japan. The earliest examples of sueki in Japan, initially associated with aristocratic tombs, closely resemble the high-fired stoneware known as dojil togi uncovered in sites at Busan and Gimhae in the area of the Gaya confederacy, and may have been introduced by refugees from Gaya which was attacked by Goguryeo in early 400s.

Ovens

The stove known as the kamado was of continental origin, having been invented in China but was modified in by the peninsular peoples before it was introduced to Japan. According to the historian William Wayne Farris, the introduction of the kamado "had a profound effect on daily life in ancient Japan" and "represented a major advance for residents of Japan's pit dwellings". The hearth ovens(ro:炉/umigamero:埋甕炉) previously used to cook meals and heat homes were less safe, more difficult to use, and less heat efficient, and by the seventh century the kamado was in widespread use in Japan. According to Farris, Japanese people referred to the kamado as kara kamado, which can be translated into English as "Korean ovens". However, in some parts of northeastern Japan, open-hearth ovens continued to be preferred.

Sewing

According to the Nihon Shoki, all the seamstresses of the village of Kume (來目) in Yamato province hailed from a sewing woman, Maketsu (眞毛津) who was given as tribute by the king of Baekje to the Yamato court.

Iron tools and iron metallurgy

According to Farris, during the Kofun period, Korea was the source for most of Japan's iron tools, including chisels, saws, sickles, axes, spades, hoes, and plows. Historically, the source of iron ingots in Korea was cut off when Yamato forces suffered defeats with their peninsular allies in 405, and again, later in 475, and, immigrant smelters developed furnaces to reuse the available iron. Later, after 450 CE, the Kinai elite found substitutes in local sands available by Placer mining to make up the shortfall. Korean iron farming tools in particular contributed to a rise in Japan's population by possibly 250 to 300 percent.

However, it was the refugees who came after 400 from Gaya, a Korean state famous for its iron production, who established some of Japan's first native iron foundries. The techniques of iron production which they brought to Japan are uniquely Korean and distinct from those used in China. The work of these Gayan refugees eventually permitted Japan to escape from its dependency on importing iron tools, armor, and weapons from Korea.

Dams and irrigation

The Japanese adapted continental U-shaped hoes and techniques for creating irrigation ponds. Extensive works uncovered in the Furuichi site near Osaka display developments far in advance of Yayoi period, and the suggestion is that both the technology and pond construction techniques were introduced by peninsular peoples from southern Korea.

Government and administration

The centralization of the Japanese state in the sixth and seventh centuries also owes a debt to Korea. In 535 the Japanese government established military garrisons called "miyake" throughout Japan to control regional powers and in many cases staffed them with Korean immigrants. Soon after a system of "be", government-regulated groups of artisans, was created, as well as a new level of local administration and a tribute tax. All of these were probably modeled off similar systems used in Baekje and other parts of Korea. Likewise Prince Shōtoku's Twelve Level Cap and Rank System of 603, a form a meritocracy implemented for Japanese government positions, may have been copied directly from the Baekje model. One of the major symbols of the Japanese state's growing power during this period was the palace of Emperor Jomei, which he appropriately called, "Baekje Palace".

Immigrants from Korea also played a role in drafting many important Japanese legal reforms of the era, including the Taika Reform. Half of the individuals actively involved in drafting Japan's Taihō Code of 703 were Korean.

Writing

Scribes from the Korean state of Baekje who wrote Chinese introduced writing to Japan in the early fifth century. The man traditionally credited as being the first to teach writing in Japan is the Baekje scholar Wani. Though a small number of Japanese people were able to read Chinese before then, it was thanks to the work of scribes from Baekje that the use of writing was popularized among the Japanese governing elite. For hundreds of years thereafter a steady stream of talented scribes would be sent from Korea to Japan, and some of these scholars from Baekje wrote and edited much of the Nihon Shoki, one of Japan's earliest works of history.

The Korean scholar Wani is credited by ancient sources with introducing written language to Japan

According to Bjarke Frellesvig, "There is ample evidence, in the form of orthographic 'Koreanisms' in the early inscriptions in Japan, that the writing practices employed in Japan were modelled on continental examples. The history of how the early Japanese modified the Chinese writing system to develop a native phonogram orthography is obscure, but scribal techniques developed in the Korean peninsular played an important role in the process of developing Man'yōgana. The pronunciation of Chinese characters at this period thus may well reflect that current in the Paekje kingdom. Frellesvig states, "However, writing extensive text passages entirely or mostly phonographically, reflected in the widespread use of man'yōgana, is a practice not attested in Korean sources which therefore seems to be an independent development which took place in Japan." Japanese katakana share many symbols with Korean Gugyeol, for example, suggesting the former arose in part at least from scribal practices in Korea, though the historical connections between the two systems are obscure.

Science, medicine, and math

In the wake of Emperor Kinmei's dispatch of ambassadors to Baekje in 553, several Korean soothsayers, doctors, and calendrical scholars were sent to Japan. The Baekje Buddhist priest and physician Gwalleuk came to Japan in 1602, and, settling in the Genkōji temple(現光寺) where he played a notable role in establishing the Sanron school, instructed several court students in the Chinese mathematics of astronomy and calendrical science. He introduced the Chinese Yuán Jiā Lì (元嘉暦) calendrical system (developed by Hé Chéng Tiān (何承天) in 443 C.E.) and transmitted his skill in medicine and pharmacy to Japanese disciples, such as Hinamitachi (日並立)

According to Nakayama Shigeru, nearly all 7th century astronomers in Japan came from Baekje, and only by the following century did the percentage of immigrant astronomers fall to 40% as local astronomers mastered the science. Native Japanese astronomers were gradually trained and by the eighth century only forty percent of Japanese astronomers were Korean. Furthermore, the Ishinpō, a Japanese medical text written in 984, still contains many medical formulas of Korean origin. During this same period, Japanese farmers divided their arable land using a system of measurement devised in Korea.

Shipbuilding

Technicians sent from the Korean kingdom of Silla introduced advanced shipbuilding techniques to Japan for the first time. In the first half of the 9th century, when the private fleet of a Silla man, Jang Bogo (張保皐), long resident in Tang China, dominated the Yellow Sea and maritime trade between China and Japan, the superiority of Korean shipbuilding technology was recognized by Fujiwara no Tsunetsugu, when as ambassador to China he chartered Korean vessels as more seaworthy for his embassy to the mainland in 838. A Japanese court edict issued in 839 ordered that Kyūshū construct a 'Silla ship', which were better that coping with stormy weather. Baekje may also have contributed shipbuilding technology to Japan.

Buddhism

In the 500s the Korean state of Baekje launched a plan to culturally remake Japan in its own image. It started in the years 513 and 516 when King Muryeong of Baekje dispatched scribes and Confucian scholars to Japan's Yamato court. Later King Seong sent Buddhist sutras and a statue of Buddha to Japan, an event described by historian Robert Buswell as "one of the two most critical influences in the entire history of Japan, rivaled only by the nineteenth-century encounter with Western culture". The year this occurred, dated by historians to either 538 or 552, marks the official introduction of Buddhism into Japan, and within two years of this date Baekje provided Japan with nine Buddhists priests to aid in propagating the faith.

Baekje continued to supply Japan with Buddhist monks for the remainder of its existence. In 587 the monk P'ungguk arrived from Baekje to serve as a tutor to Emperor Yōmei's younger brother and later settled down as the first abbot of Japan's Shitennō-ji Temple. In 595 the monk Hyeja arrived in Japan from Goguryeo. He became a mentor to Prince Shōtoku and lived in Asuka-dera Temple. By the reign of the Japanese Empress Suiko (592–628), there were over one thousand monks and nuns living in Japan, a substantial percentage of whom were Korean.

A great many Buddhist writings published during Korea's Goryeo dynasty (918–1392) were also highly influential upon their arrival in Japan. Such Korean ideas would play an important role in the development of Japanese Pure Land Buddhism. The Japanese monk Shinran was among those known to be influenced by Korean Buddhism, particularly by the Sillan monk Gyeongheung. Robert Buswell notes that the form of Buddhism Korea was propagating throughout its history was "a vibrant cultural tradition in its own right" and that Korea did not serve simply as a "bridge" between China and Japan.

Artistic influence

According to the scholar Insoo Cho, Korean artwork has had a "huge impact" on Japan throughout history, though until recently the subject was often neglected within academia. Beatrix von Ragué has noted that in particular, "one can hardly underestimate the role which, from the fifth to the seventh centuries, Korean artists and craftsmen played in the early art ... of Japan."

Lacquerwork

Tamamushi Shrine

The first Japanese lacquerwork was produced by or influenced by Korean and Chinese craftsmen in Japan. Most notably is Tamamushi Shrine, a miniature shrine in Horyū-ji Temple, which was created in Korean style, possibly by a Korean immigrant to Japan. Tamamushi shrine, described by Beatrix von Ragué as "the oldest example of the true art of lacquerwork to have survived in Japan", is decorated with a uniquely Korean inlay composed of the wings of tamamushi beetles. Ernest Fenollosa has called Tamamushi shrine, one of the "great monuments of sixth-century Corean art".

Japanese lacquerware teabowls, boxes, and tables of the Azuchi–Momoyama period (1568–1600) also show signs of Korean artistic influence. The mother-of-pearl inlay frequently used in this lacquerware is of clearly Korean origin.

Painting

The immigration of Korean and Chinese painters to Japan during the Asuka period transformed Japanese art. For instance, in the year 610 Damjing (曇徵), a Buddhist monk from Goguryeo, brought paints, brushes, and paper to Japan. Damjing is credited with introducing the arts of papermaking and of preparing pigments to Japan for the first time, and he is also regarded as the artist behind the wall painting in the main hall of Japan's Horyu-ji Temple which was later burned down in a fire.

However, it was during the Muromachi period (1337–1573) of Japanese history that Korean influence on Japanese painting reached its peak. Korean art and artists frequently arrived on Japan's shores, influencing both the style and theme of Japanese ink painting. The two most important Japanese ink painters of the period were Shūbun, whose art displays many of the characteristic features of Korean painting, and Sumon, who was himself an immigrant from Korea. Consequently, one Japanese historian, Sokuro Wakimoto, has even described the period between 1394 and 1486 as the "Era of Korean Style" in Japanese ink painting.

Then during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, as a result of the Joseon missions to Japan, the Japanese artists who were developing nanga painting came into close contact with Korean artists. Though Japanese nanga received inspiration from many sources, the historian Burglind Jungmann concludes that Korean namjonghwa painting "may well have been the most important for creating the Nanga style". It was the Korean brush and ink techniques in particular which are known to have had a significant impact on such Japanese painters as Ike no Taiga, Gion Nankai, and Sakaki Hyakusen.

Music and dance

In ancient times the imperial court of Japan imported all its music from abroad, though it was Korean music that reached Japan first. The first Korean music may have infiltrated Japan as early as the third century. Korean court music in ancient Japan was at first called "sankangaku" in Japanese, referring to music from all the states of the Korean peninsula, but it was later termed "komagaku" in reference specifically to the court music of the Korean kingdom of Guguryeo.

Komabue, a Korean flute used in early Japanese court music

Musicians from various Korean states often went to work in Japan. Mimaji, a Korean entertainer from Baekje, introduced Chinese dance and Chinese gigaku music to Japan in 612. By the time of the Nara period (710–794), every musician in Japan's imperial court was either Korean or Chinese. Korean musical instruments which became popular in Japan during this period include the flute known as the komabue, the zither known as the gayageum, and the harp known as the shiragikoto.

Though much has been written about Korean influence on early Japanese court music, Taeko Kusano has stated that Korean influence on Japanese folk music during the Edo period (1603–1868) represents a very important but neglected field of study. According to Taeko Kusano, each of the Joseon missions to Japan included about fifty Korean musicians and left their mark on Japanese folk music. Most notably, the "tojin procession", which was practiced in Nagasaki, the "tojin dance", which arose in modern-day Mie Prefecture, and the "karako dance", which exists in modern-day Okayama Prefecture, all have Korean roots and utilize Korean-based music.

Silk weaving

According to William Wayne Farris, citing a leading Japanese expert on ancient cloth, the production of high-quality silk twill took off in Japan from the fifth century onward as a result of new technology brought from Korea. Farris argues that Japan's Hata clan, who are believed to have been specialists in the art of silk weaving and silk tapestry, immigrated to Japan from the region of the Korean peninsula. By contrast, historian Cho-yun Hsu believes that the Hata clan were of Chinese descent.

Jewelry

Japan at first imported jewelry made of glass, gold, and silver from Korea, but in the fifth century the techniques of gold and silver metallurgy also entered Japan from Korea, possibly from the Korean states of Baekje and Gaya. Korean immigrants established important sites of jewelry manufacturing in Katsuragi, Gunma, and other places in Japan, allowing Japan to domestically produce its first gold and silver earrings, crowns, and beads.

Sculpture

Along with Buddhism, the art of Buddhist sculpture also spread to Japan from Korea. At first almost all Japanese Buddhist sculptures were imported from Korea, and these imports demonstrate an artistic style which would dominate Japanese sculpture during the Asuka period (538–710). In the years 577 and 588 the Korean state of Baekje dispatched to Japan expert statue sculptors.

The "Crown-Coiffed Maitreya"

One of the most notable examples of Korean influence on Japanese sculpture is the Buddha statue in the Koryu-ji Temple, sometimes referred to as the "Crown-Coiffed Maitreya". This statue, which has been described by Japan as its "National Treasure No. 1", was directly copied from a Korean prototype around the seventh century. Likewise, the Great Buddha sculpture of Todai-ji Temple, as well as both the Baekje Kannon and the Guze Kannon sculptures of Japan's Horyu-ji Temple, are believed to have been sculpted by Koreans. The Guze Kannon was described as "the greatest perfect monument of Corean art" by Ernest Fenollosa.

Mythology and literature

Many Japanese myths about the age of the gods are believed by scholars including Mikiso Hane and Kim Yeol-kyu to have their origins in Korean stories.

Concerning literature, Roy Andrew Miller has stated that, "Japanese scholars have made important progress in identifying the seminal contributions of Korean immigrants, and of Korean literary culture as brought to Japan by the early Korean diaspora from the Old Korean kingdoms, to the formative stages of early Japanese poetic art". Susumu Nakanishi has argued that Okura was born in the Korean kingdom of Baekje to a high court doctor and came with his émigré family to Yamato at the age of 3 after the collapse of that kingdom. It has been noted that the Korean genre of hyangga (郷歌), of which only 25 examples survive from the Silla kingdom's Samdaemok (三代目), compiled in 888 CE, differ greatly in both form and theme from the Man'yō poems, with the single exception of some of Yamanoue no Okura's poetry which shares their Buddhist-philosophical thematics. Roy Andrew Miller, arguing that Okura's "Korean ethnicity" is an established fact though one disliked by the Japanese literary establishment, speaks of his "unique binational background and multilingual heritage".

Architecture

The main hall of Asuka-dera Temple

William Wayne Farris has noted that "Architecture was one art that changed forever with the importation of Buddhism" from Korea. In 587 the Buddhist Soga clan took control of the Japanese government, and the very next year in 588 the kingdom of Baekje sent Japan two architects, one metal smith, four roof tilers, and one painter who were assigned the task of constructing Japan's first full-fledged Buddhist temple. This temple was Asuka-dera Temple, completed in 596, and it was only the first of many such temples put together on the Baekje model. According to the historian Jonathan W. Best "virtually all of the numerous complete temples built in Japan between the last decade of the sixth and the middle of the seventh centuries" were designed off Korean models. Among such early Japanese temples designed and built with Korean aid are Shitennō-ji Temple and Hōryū-ji Temple.

Many of the temple bells were also of Korean design and origin. As late as the early eleventh century Korean bells were being delivered to many Japanese temples including Enjō-ji Temple. In the year 1921, eighteen Korean temple bells were designated as national treasures of Japan.

In addition to temples, starting from the sixth century advanced stonecutting technology entered Japan from Korea and as a result Japanese tomb construction also began to change in favor of Korean models. During this time Japan's famous keyhole-shaped tombs gradually faded out of existence and were replaced by the corridor tombs prevalent in Baekje.

Cultural transfers during Hideyoshi's invasions of Korea

The invasions of Korea by Japanese leader Toyotomi Hideyoshi between 1592 and 1598 were an extremely vigorous period of two-way cross-cultural transfer between Korea and Japan. Although Japan ultimately lost the war, Hideyoshi and his generals used the opportunity to loot valuable commodities from Korea and to kidnap skilled Korean craftsmen and take them back to Japan. Tokutomi Sohō summed up the conflict by saying that, "While neither Japan nor Choson gained any advantages from this war, Japan gained cultural benefits from the importation of moveable type printing, technological benefits from ceramics, and diplomatic benefits from its contact with Ming China."

Printing technology and books

At the start of the invasion in 1592 Korean books and book printing technology were one of Japan's top priorities for looting, especially metal moveable type. One commander alone, Ukita Hideie, is said to have had 200,000 printing types and books removed from Korea's Gyeongbokgung Palace. The printing types remained in use in Japan for many decades and the books were numerous enough to fill many libraries. According to the historian Ha Woo Bong, "metal and wood moveable types looted from Choson became catalysts for the development of printing technology and scholarship in the Edo period."

Ceramics

Prior to the invasion, Korea's high-quality ceramic pottery was prized in Japan, particularly the Korean teabowls used in the Japanese tea ceremony. Because of this, Japanese soldiers made great efforts to find skilled Korean potters and transfer them to Japan. For this reason, the Japanese invasion of Korea is sometimes referred to as the "Teabowl War" or the "Pottery War".

Hundreds of Korean potters were taken by the Japanese Army back to Japan with them, either being forcibly kidnapped or else being persuaded to leave. Once settled in Japan, the Korean potters were put to work making ceramics. Historian Andrew Maske has concluded that, "Without a doubt the single most important development in Japanese ceramics in the past five hundred years was the importation of Korean ceramic technology as a result of the invasions of Korea by the Japanese under Toyotomi Hideyoshi." Imari porcelain, Satsuma ware, Hagi ware, Karatsu ware, and Takatori ware were all pioneered by Koreans who came to Japan at this time.

Construction

Among the skilled craftsmen removed from Korea by Japanese forces were roof tilers, who would go on to make important contributions to tiling Japanese houses and castles. For example, one Korean tiler participated in the expansion of Kumamoto Castle. Furthermore, the Japanese daimyo Katō Kiyomasa had Nagoya Castle constructed using stonework techniques that he had learned during his time in Korea.

Neo-Confucianism

Kang Hang, a Korean neo-Confucian scholar, was kidnapped in Korea by Japanese soldiers and taken to Japan. He lived in Japan until the year 1600 during which time he formed an acquaintance with the scholar Fujiwara Seika and instructed him in neo-Confucian philosophy. Some historians believe that other Korean neo-Confucianists such as Yi Toe-gye also had a major impact on Japanese neo-Confucianism at this time. The idea was developed in particular by Abe Yoshio (阿部吉雄). One Korean official visiting Japan in 1719 reported that "Of all the books by Korean scholars, the Japanese most respect the works of Yi Toe-gye."

By contrast, Willem van Boot called this theory in question in his 1982 doctoral thesis and later works. Jurgis Elisonas wrote that the theory has been "rebutted convincingly".

Historiography

The interpretation of the history of early contacts, and the nature of the relations, between Japan and the states of the Korean peninsula has long been complicated by reciprocal nationalisms which skew interpretations. In the modern period, especially in the wake of Japan's annexation of Korea, a Tokugawa era theory developed which held that in antiquity Japan had ruled over Korea and its elites, and that the roots of the two people and polities were identical. This was called the "common ancestry theory" (naisen dōsoron:内鮮同祖論) and, based on early texts that spoke of Yamato invasions of the peninsula and the establishment of Mimana, was used to justify Japan's colonial seizure of Korea (seikanron:征韓論) as was evidence from excavations at the Lelang Commandery that ancient Korea had been long been a colonized country. In this perspective, while recognizing the great impact of Chinese civilization on both polities, the role of Korean peninsular peoples in the transmission of Sinic culture was underplayed and it was claimed that Japan had retained its indigenous uniqueness by consistently modifying the cultural elements flowing through Korea to Yamato. Korean nationalist historiography (minjok sahak) challenged Japanese versions of their history while often adopting the same prejudices, and asserted in turn, the country had national sovereignty in prehistoric times, and a racial and cultural superiority over other east Asian countries, reflecting the legacy of colonial Japan’s own prejudices.

Recently, a growing consensus has been reached among historians on the importance of direct cultural transfers from Korea to Japan. However, the issue of Korean influence on Japanese culture continues to be a sensitive matter to discuss. The excavation of many of Japan's earliest imperial tombs, which might shed important light on the subject, remains prohibited by the Japanese government. By contrast, the admission by Emperor Akihito that the Imperial Family of Japan included Korean ancestors helped to improve bilateral Korea-Japan relations. Recently, the Kyoto Cultural Museum has stated that, "In seeking the source of Japan’s ancient culture many will look to China, but the quest will finally lead to Korea, where China's advanced culture was accepted and assimilated. In actuality, the people who crossed the sea were the people of the Korea Peninsula and their culture was the Korean culture."

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 404, 416–419.
  2. ^ Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 420–422.
  3. ^ Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 430–432.
  4. ^ Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 432, 437–439, 447.
  5. Pai,pp. 234–235
  6. Totman pp.62-63
  7. ^ Farris (1998), pp. 69–70, 110, 116, 120–122.
  8. Ch'on Kwan-u, p. 11.
  9. Farris (1998), pp. 68, 120.
  10. Pai, p.234.
  11. ^ Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 405, 433–436.
  12. Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 438, 444.
  13. ^ Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 441–442.
  14. Tony McNicol (April 28, 2008). "Japanese Royal Tomb Opened to Scholars for First Time". National Geographic News. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  15. ^ Kim, p. 75.
  16. ^ McCallum (2009), p. 19.
  17. ^ Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 439–440.
  18. Farris (2009), p. 25.
  19. ^ Farris (1998), pp. 72–76.
  20. Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, p. 438.
  21. ^ Farris (1998), pp. 105, 109.
  22. ^ Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 438–439.
  23. ^ Farris (1998), pp. 77–79.
  24. Comoe, p. 26.
  25. Batten, pp. 27–28.
  26. Farris 1998 pp.84-5
  27. ^ Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 433, 437–438, 441.
  28. ^ Farris (1998), pp. 84–87.
  29. Totman, pp.64–65.
  30. Tokyo National Museum, p.3.
  31. Farris (1998), pp. 79–82.
  32. Totman pp.67-68.
  33. Farris (1998), p. 83.
  34. Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 8–12.
  35. Farris, pp.81-82.
  36. ^ Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 443–444.
  37. ^ Farris (1998), pp. 104–105.
  38. Hane, p. 15.
  39. ^ Henshall, pp. 17, 228.
  40. Miyake, p. 9.
  41. Seeley, pp. 5–6, 23.
  42. Hane, p. 26.
  43. Farris (1998), p. 99.
  44. Ch'on, p. 18.
  45. ^ Frellesvig, p. 13
  46. Bentley, p. 9.
  47. Miyake, p. 9.
  48. ^ Lee and Ramsey, pp. 2, 84: "Simplified kugyŏl looks like the Japanese katakana. Some of the resemblances are superficial ... ut many other symbols are identical in form and value ... We do not know just what the historical connections were between these two transcription systems. The origins of kugyŏl have still not been accurately dated or documented. But many in Japan as well as Korea believe that the beginnings of katakana and the orthographic principles they represent, derive at least in part from earlier practices on the Korean peninsular."
  49. Kamstra, p. 60.
  50. Grayson, p. 37.
  51. Keller and Volkov, p. 64.
  52. Lu and Needham, p. 264.
  53. Rosner, p. 13.
  54. Sŏng-nae Pak,Science and Technology in Korean History: Excursions, Innovations, and Issues, Jain Publishing Company, 2005 p.44 (Looks like it is self-published in a nationalist vanity press. Perhaps not RS)
  55. ^ Pak, pp. 42–45.
  56. Pak, pp. 45–46.
  57. Farris (1998), p. 105.
  58. ^ Lee (August 1970), pp. 12, 29.
  59. Cho, Youngjoo, pp. 51–70.
  60. Sansom, pp. 134–135, 137.
  61. Farris,"Shipbuilding and Nautical technology in Maritime Japan: Origins to 1600", in The Mariner's Mirror, vol. 95, No. 3 August, 2009 pp. 260–283.
  62. ^ Kamata, pp. 151–155.
  63. ^ Buswell, pp. 2–4.
  64. ^ Best, pp. 31–34.
  65. ^ Lee (September 1970), pp. 20, 31.
  66. Cho, Insoo, p. 162.
  67. ^ von Ragué, pp. 5–7.
  68. ^ Fenollosa, pp. 49–50.
  69. von Ragué, pp. 176–179.
  70. ^ Akiyama, pp. 19–20, 26.
  71. ^ Lee (October 1970), pp. 18, 33.
  72. Needham and Tsien, p. 331.
  73. Needham and Wang, p. 401.
  74. Pak, p. 41.
  75. Ahn, pp. 195–201.
  76. Jungmann, pp. 205–211.
  77. ^ Malm, pp. 33, 98–100, 109.
  78. Banham, p. 559.
  79. Kusano, pp. 31–36.
  80. ^ Farris (1998), p. 97.
  81. Hsu, p. 248.
  82. Farris (1998), pp. 96, 118.
  83. ^ Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 441, 443.
  84. ^ McCallum (1982), pp. 22, 26, 28.
  85. Farris (1998), pp. 102–103.
  86. ^ Jung, pp. 113–114, 119.
  87. McBride, 90.
  88. Portal, 52.
  89. Hane, p. 23.
  90. Joo-Young Yoo (1994). "Foundation and Creation Myths in Korea and Japan: Patterns and Connections". McNair Journal. Archived from the original on February 17, 2003. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  91. Miller (1980), p. 776.
  92. Levy, pp.42–43.
  93. Miller (1997), pp. 85–86, p.104.
  94. ^ Farris (1998), p. 103.
  95. Mori, 356.
  96. Farris, pp. 92–93.
  97. Ha, p. 335.
  98. Ha, pp. 328–329.
  99. Portal, pp. 140–141.
  100. ^ Ha, pp. 330–331.
  101. ^ Maske, p. 43.
  102. ^ Koo Tae-hoon (2008). "Flowering of Korean Ceramic Culture in Japan". Korea Focus. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  103. ^ Ha, pp. 324–325.
  104. Chung, p. 22.
  105. Jansen, p. 70.
  106. Tucker, p. 68.
  107. Sato, p. 293.
  108. Lewis, p. 252.
  109. Elisonas, p. 108.
  110. Em, p. 10ff.
  111. ^ Pai, pp. 1–21.
  112. Xu, pp. 89–135 pp. 92ff.
  113. Ebrey and Walthall, p.117.
  114. Shin, p.55:’the Japanese influenced Korean nationalist thinking ... The search for documentation of the unique and immutable core-the racial origins-of the Korean people appears similar to the Japanese obsession with the national essence (kokutai) in the 1930s.'
  115. Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, pp. 404–406.
  116. Farris (1998), p. 56.
  117. Holland Cotter (April 6, 2003). "Japanese Art and Its Korean Secret". The New York Times. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  118. Rhee, Aikens, Choi, and Ro, p. 405.

Bibliography

  • Ahn Hwi-Joon, "Korean Influence on Japanese Ink Paintings of the Muromachi Period", Korea Journal, Winter 1997.
  • Akiyama, Terukazu, Japanese Painting. New York: Rizzoli International Publications, 1977.
  • Banham, Martin, The Cambridge Guide to World Theatre. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  • Batten, Bruce, Gateway to Japan: Hakata in War And Peace, 500-1300. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2006.
  • Bentley, John R., A Descriptive Grammar of Early Old Japanese Prose. Boston: BRILL, 2001.
  • Best, Jonathan W., "Paekche and the Incipiency of Buddhism in Japan", in Currents and Countercurrents: Korean Influences on the East Asian Buddhist Traditions, ed. Robert Buswell. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2005.
  • Buswell Jr., Robert, "Patterns of Influence in East Asian Buddhism: The Korean Case", in Currents and Countercurrents: Korean Influences on the East Asian Buddhist Traditions, ed. Robert Buswell. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2005.
  • Chung, Edward, The Korean Neo-Confucianism of Yi T'oegye and Yi Yulgok. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.
  • Cho, Insoo , "Painters as Envoys: Korean Inspiration in Eighteenth Century Japanese Nanga (Review)", Journal of Korean Studies, Fall 2007.
  • Cho, Youngjoo , "The Small but Magnificent Counter-Piracy Operations of the republic of Korea", in Freedom of Navigation and Globalization, eds. Myron H. Nordquist, John Norton Moore, Robert Beckman, and Ronan Long. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff Publishers, 2014.
  • Ch'on Kwan-u, "A New Interpretation of the Problems of Mimana (I)". Korea Journal, February 1974.
  • Comoe, Michael, Shotoku: Ethnicity, Ritual, and Violence in the Japanese Buddhist Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).
  • Ebrey, Patricia Buckley and Walthall, Anne, East Asia: A Cultural, Social, and Political History. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2013.
  • Elisonas, Jurgis, "The Inseparable Trinity: Japan's Relations with China and Korea", in The Cambridge History of Japan Volume Four, ed. John Whitney Hall. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  • Em, Henry, The Great Enterprise: Sovereignty and Historiography in Modern Korea, Part 2. London: Duke University Press, 2013.
  • Farris, William Wayne, Sacred Texts and Buried Treasures: Issues in the Historical Archaeology of Ancient Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1998.
  • Farris, William Wayne, Japan to 1600: A Social and Economic History. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2009.
  • Fenollosa, Ernest, Epochs of Chinese and Japanese Art Volume One. New York: Frederick A. Stokes, 1912.
  • Frellesvig, Bjarke, A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  • Grayson, James H., Korea - A Religious History. New York: Routledge, 2013.
  • Ha Woo Bong, "War and Cultural Exchange", in The East Asian War, 1592–1598, eds. James B. Lewis. New York: Routledge, 2015.
  • Hane, Mikiso, Premodern Japan: A Historical Survey. Boulder: Westview Press, 1991.
  • Henshall, Kenneth G, A History of Japan: From Stone Age to Superpower. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1999.
  • Hsu, Cho-yun, China: A New Cultural History. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.
  • Jansen, Marius, The Making of Modern Japan. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press, 2000.
  • Jung Hyoun, "Who Made Japan's National Treasure No. 1", in The Foreseen and the Unforeseen in Historical Relations Between Korea and Japan, eds. Northeast Asian History Foundation. Seoul: Northeast Asian History Foundation, 2009.
  • Jungmann, Burglind, Painters as Envoys: Korean Inspiration in Eighteenth-Century Japanese Nanga. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
  • Kamata Shigeo, "The Transmission of Paekche Buddhism to Japan", in Introduction of Buddhism to Japan: New Cultural Patterns, eds. Lewis R. Lancaster and CS Yu. Berkeley, California: Asian Humanities Press, 1989.
  • Kamstra, Jacques H., Encounter Or Syncretism: The Initial Growth of Japanese Buddhism. Leiden: Brill, 1967.
  • Keller, Agathe, and Volkov, Alexei, "Mathematics Education in Oriental Antiquity and Medieval Ages", in Handbook on the History of Mathematics Education, eds. Alexander Karp and Gert Schubring. New York: Springer, 2014.
  • Kim, Eun Mee and Ryoo, Jiwon, "South Korean Culture Goes Global: K-Pop and the Korean Wave," Korean Social Science Journal, 2007.
  • Kim, Jinwung, A History of Korea: From 'Land of the Morning Calm' to States in Conflict. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012.
  • Kusano, Taeko, "Unknown Aspects of Korean Influence on Japanese Folk Music", Yearbook for Traditional Music, 1983.
  • Lee, Hyoun-jun, "Korean Influence on Japanese Culture (1)", Korean Frontier, August 1970.
  • Lee, Hyoun-jun, "Korean Influence on Japanese Culture (2)", Korean Frontier, September 1970.
  • Lee, Hyoun-jun, "Korean Influence on Japanese Culture (3)", Korean Frontier, October 1970.
  • Lee, Ki-Moon, and Ramsey, S. Robert, A History of the Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  • Levy, Ian Hideo, Hitomaro and the Birth of Japanese Lyricism. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984.
  • Lewis, James B., Frontier Contact Between Choson Korea and Tokugawa Japan. New York: Routledge, 2005.
  • Lu, Gwei-djen, and Needham, Joseph, Celestial Lancets: A History and Rationale of Acupuncture and Moxa. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
  • Malm, William P., Traditional Japanese Music and Musical Instruments. New York: Kodansha International, 1959.
  • Maske, Andrew, "The Continental Origins of Takatori Ware: The Introduction of Korean Potters and Technology to Japan Through the Invasions of 1592–1598", Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan, 1994.
  • McBride, Richard D., Domesticating the Dharma: Buddhist Cults and the Hwaom Synthesis in Silla Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2008.
  • McCallum, Donald, "Korean Influence on Early Japanese Buddhist Sculpture," Korean Culture, March 1982.
  • McCallum, Donald, The Four Great Temples: Buddhist Archaeology, Architecture, and Icons of Seventh-Century Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2009).
  • Miller, Roy Andrew, "Uri Famëba", in Wasser-Spuren: Festschrift für Wolfram Naumann zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. Stanca Scholz-Cionca. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 1997.
  • Miller, Roy Andrew, "Plus Ça Change...", The Journal of Asian Studies, August 1980.
  • Miyake, Marc Hideo, Old Japanese: A Phonetic Reconstruction. New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003.
  • Mori Ikuo, "Korean Influence and Japanese Innovation in Tiles of the Asuka-Hakuho Period", in Transmitting the Forms of Divinity: Early Buddhist Art from Korea and Japan, eds. Washizuka Hiromitsu, et al. New York: Japan Society, 2003.
  • Needham, Joseph, and Tsien Tsuen-Hsuin, Science and Civilisation in China: Volume 5, Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Part 1, Paper and Printing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
  • Needham, Joseph, and Wang Ling, Science and Civilisation in China: Volume 4, Physics and Physical Technology, Part 2, Mechanical Engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.
  • Pai, Hyung Il, Constructing "Korean" Origins: A Critical Review of Archaeology, Historiography, and Racial Myth in Korean State-formation Theories. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center, 2000.
  • Pak, Song-nae, Science and Technology in Korean History: Excursions, Innovations, and Issues. Fremont, California: Jain, 2005.
  • Portal, Jane, Korea: Art and Archaeology. New York: Thames & Hudson, 2000.
  • Rhee, Song-Nai, Aikens, C. Melvin, Choi, Sung-Rak, and Ro, Hyuk-Jin, "Korean Contributions to Agriculture, Technology, and State Formation in Japan". Asian Perspectives, Fall 2007.
  • Rosner, Erhard, Medizingeschichte Japans. Leiden: BRILL, 1988.
  • Sansom, George. A History of Japan. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958.
  • Sato, Seizaburo, "Response to the West: The Korean and Japanese Patterns, ed. Albert M Craig. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.
  • Seeley, Christopher, A History of Writing in Japan. New York: EJ Brill, 1991.
  • Shin, Gi-Wook, Ethnic Nationalism in Korea: Genealogy, Politics, and Legacy. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006.
  • Tokyo National Museum, Pageant of Japanese Art: Textiles and Lacquer. Tokyo: Toto Bunka, 1952.
  • Totman, Conrad, Japan: An Environmental History. London: IB Tauris, 2014.
  • Tucker, Mary Evelyn, Moral and Spiritual Cultivation in Japanese Neo-Confucianism: The Life and Thought of Kaibara Ekken (1630–1714). Albany: State University of New York Press, 1989.
  • von Ragué, Beatrix, A History of Japanese Lacquerwork. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976.
  • Xu, Stella, Reconstructing Ancient Korean History: The Formation of Korean-ness in the Shadow of History . Lanham: Lexington Books, 2016.

External links

Categories: