| Revision as of 18:23, 28 August 2006 editPottsf (talk | contribs)438 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:14, 29 August 2006 edit undoStirling Newberry (talk | contribs)5,191 edits Spamming harrassing text messages is not acceptableNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| Looking forward to this missive being flushed real soon. --] 18:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC) | Looking forward to this missive being flushed real soon. --] 18:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Spamming my phone with text messages is not an acceptable means of trying to deal with problems. ] 21:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:14, 29 August 2006
Thanks for the note about Stirling Newberry. It looks like you keep your Talk page "flushed." Well, there's a certain economy in that, not to mention discretion.
I have a POV on most subjects that is distinctly non-majority (see my User page, which you probably already did), but I try VERY hard to be aware of what the consensus position is before writing, and to keep my own input at least intelligible from THAT POV (calling that POV "neutral" might be a misnomer, unless you just declare that they mean the same thing).
Stirling, however, strikes me as rather more the tool of his own POV, although it may just seem that way to me because his POV seems pretty different from mine. I get the impression from his User page and his behavior that his POV is highly Stirling-Newberry-centric, and that he wishes to be thought the ultimate authority on the subjects he addresses.
By the way, if you really ARE an NPOV warrior, your attentions to the Gold Standard article, for which I have further plans, are and will be much needed.
Looking forward to this missive being flushed real soon. --Joe 18:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Spamming my phone with text messages is not an acceptable means of trying to deal with problems. Stirling Newberry 21:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)