Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:54, 5 July 2016

Please note: To keep this page tidy and reduce risk of lag/crashing I will remove conversations which are dead for over a week. Awards will be put in an appropriate place. For reasons of transparency, all past conversations will still exist in the history, if you really need to look.

Further note for ITN awards: I appreciated these but I do not store these because the awarding is inconsistent. Sometimes I have not been awarded for the nomination, sometimes I have been awarded just for editing. I don't think that nominating something is a meritous act, possibly the only nomination where I was even a major contributor would be the sudden and shocking death of Patrick Ekeng.

Orphaned non-free image File:Joinville Esporte Clube.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Joinville Esporte Clube.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:K.S.C. Lokeren Oost-Vlaanderen.png

Thanks for uploading File:K.S.C. Lokeren Oost-Vlaanderen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

1 July

On Misplaced Pages time (UTC) is not 1 July. I think we should wait. Or what matters is the time in the country where the contract was signed? SLBedit (talk) 22:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. SLBedit (talk) 23:00, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Good suggestion. SLBedit (talk) 00:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Your recent editing history at 2015 Copa América shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chase (talk) 22:25, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Although Chase is being quite hypocritical as he was one of the other edit warriors in this discussion, he is right, you should not have continued to revert. As I have warned both chase and SavvyJack about this, please take this a notice that had I been aware of the frequency with which you reverted before things were taken to the talk page I would have blocked you. Fenix down (talk) 07:11, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Maybe CCamp2013 should think before writing such nonsense.--84.160.169.20 (talk) 07:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

@Fenix down:; May I ask how I was being hypocritical? Chase (talk) 15:49, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

You are telling someone else not to edit war in and edit war that you yourself are involved in. Templates are not there for you to try to force your opinion through. Fenix down (talk) 18:52, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

@Fenix down: I wasn't forcing my opinion, He violated that rule and I was warning him. Nothing hypocritical. I did not violate the rule. Chase (talk) 21:46, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Edit summaries like this are completely unacceptable and if I see anything like it again you will be blocked. GiantSnowman 07:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

I can't see anything unacceptable in this edit summary.--84.160.169.20 (talk) 08:04, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

MOTHERF*CKER