User talk:Clean Copy: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 21:39, 20 July 2016 editClean Copy (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,189 edits →pedophilia: better← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:50, 20 July 2016 edit undoPlmokg22345 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users814 edits →pedophilia Next edit →
Line 37:		Line 37:

	:"Informally" is fine. (You originally put "incorrectly".) ]<sup>]</sup> 21:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)		:"Informally" is fine. (You originally put "incorrectly".) ]<sup>]</sup> 21:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
			{{Ping\|Clean Copy}} ok thank you sir

Revision as of 21:50, 20 July 2016

--/Archive --/Archive2 --/Archive3 --/Archive4 --/Archive Waldorf project --/Archive5

Reincarnation disambiguation

Thanks, I think, for this edit. I had considered Indus Valley Civilization, but I didn't see any support for that in the sources or elsewhere. After you changed it, it seems to have gotten someone's attention, since they apparently "know" that there's no support for it in IVC and they've now edited things so there is no longer any hint that the concept originated earlier than the Vedic culture, which I thought was a key point. Since I'm no expert, I'm satisfied to leave it as it now is. —jmcgnh 15:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Please claim your upload(s): File:Metamorphoses 6.png

Hi, Thank you, for uploading this file.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Misplaced Pages is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm some details,

If it's your own work, please include {{own}}, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{media by uploader}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not your own work please provide as much sourcing/authorship information as you are able to.

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:13, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Ethnic slurs

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Ethnic slurs. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

pedophilia

@Clean Copy: pedophilia is not a law it is a medical diagnosis and means to be sexual attracted to prepubescent children, cops or any other law enforcement agency that uses it as a term for someone who breaks a sexual based crime that relates to just being underage are using it indiscriminately and are incorrect, some people use the word for anyone who dates younger than them even if both parties are of legal age just because they say that dose not mean it is true or is a applicable definition. there is also a commonly accepted definition of the word and that is the one provided by the dsm and or icd there are no other definitions other some people using it indiscriminately for any one that commits a sexual based crime against a minor or is sexual attracted to one but they are not pedophiles unless they are attracted to prepubescent children, on the wiki page about child sexual abuse they actually get this right by saying in the beginning(The word pedophile is commonly applied indiscriminately to anyone who sexually abuses a child, but child sexual offenders are not pedophiles unless they have a strong sexual interest in prepubescent children.) people who use pedophile to refer to being attracted to anyone under age is using it incorrect, it is a medical disorder that refers to being attracted to young children the wiki article on pedophile already indicated this too the word incorrectly should be applied to Law and forensic psychology definitions

There is the word's medical definition and there is its common usage. These can co-exist side-by-side. In a non-medical context, such as this encyclopedia, all contexts and usages should be recognized. Clean Copy 19:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

@Clean Copy: I know it is talking about common usage i just want to make it more clear by changing In law enforcement circles, the term pedophile is sometimes used in a broad manner to encompass a person who commits one or more sexually-based crimes that relate to legally underage victims to In law enforcement circles, the term pedophile is sometimes used informally in a broad manner to encompass a person who commits one or more sexually-based crimes that relate to legally underage victims the common usage is not what pedophilia means it is a medical diagnosis that is diagnosed and refers to the sexual attraction to prepubescent children the individual must be at least 16 and 5 years older the common usage is not the correct meaning and is incorrect no physiatrist would ever consider or diagnose somebody for pedophile for only being attracted to a 15 yr old regardless of what the mass media thinks that individual is not is irrelevant the common usage is used indiscriminately and incorrect but regardless that is not the point i know some people use it in other usages in the sub sec Misuse of medical terminology it mention that The words pedophile and pedophilia are commonly used informally to describe an adult's sexual interest in pubescent or post-pubescent teenagers and i think that the sentence in the Law and forensic psychology should be changed to refect that it is informal by saying n law enforcement circles, the term pedophile is sometimes used informally in a broad manner to encompass a person who commits one or more sexually-based crimes that relate to legally underage victims. medical usage and common usage should not co-exist side by side it is a medical diseases there is one definition and that is the ones by dsm and icd

"Informally" is fine. (You originally put "incorrectly".) Clean Copy 21:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

@Clean Copy: ok thank you sir