| Revision as of 20:13, 26 March 2007 editBrian0918 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users41,856 editsm standardize citations← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 04:15, 4 August 2016 edit undoGraham11 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,153 edits The article already has a more current graphic in the same vein |
| (23 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{tasks |
|
* Standardize citation usage |
|
|
|
|requests= |
|
* Add more ]. (Especially to ].) |
|
|
|
|copyedit= |
|
* Expand "]" section to about 3 prose paragraphs in length. |
|
|
|
|wikify= |
|
* Consider rewriting "]" from scratch, as prose paragraphs rather than a set of lists. |
|
|
|
|merge= |
|
* Work on improving daughter articles like ], ], ]. |
|
|
|
|split= |
|
|
|
|
|
|verify= |
|
If you leave out gnostic atheism, then you are being inaccurate and unreliable. ] 18:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Paul Keller kellerp@uwstout.edu You have hidden it from the main text. If you google gnostic atheism, you will get over 400,000 hits, which is second only to strong atheism. Gnostic atheism is a significant form of atheism. |
|
|
|
|cleanup= |
|
|
|expand= |
|
|
|disambiguation= |
|
|
|stubs= |
|
|
|update= |
|
|
|npov= |
|
|
|infobox= |
|
|
|other= Add an FAQ to this talk page to curtail future edit-warring and give information to new editors |
|
|
}} |
