Misplaced Pages

User talk:81.58.29.91: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:08, 1 September 2006 editKing of Hearts (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators68,823 editsm different whois link← Previous edit Revision as of 12:16, 2 September 2006 edit undoSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits 3RR warningNext edit →
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 45: Line 45:
== Stop == == Stop ==
Please stop blanking this page; if people really wanted to find out your information, they could always run a . -- ] ] ] ] ] 22:06, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Please stop blanking this page; if people really wanted to find out your information, they could always run a . -- ] ] ] ] ] 22:06, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

== 3RR warning ==

You have violated the 3RR rule at ]. This says we may not undo another editor's work, in whole or in part, whether involving the same material or different material each time, more than three times in 24 hours. If you revert again, you may be reported and blocked from editing. Please review ] carefully. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 12:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

:As I said, you need to read ] very carefully. Any undoing of another editor's work (including his/her reverts) in whole or in part counts as a revert, and you know you've done that more than three times in the last 24 hours. Therefore, you have violated 3RR. The only reason I haven't reported you so far is that I can't be bothered. But that will change if you do it again, so please don't, for both our sakes. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 12:10, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

::Okay, one last time. '''Read the policy'''. It doesn't matter what the content is; it doesn't matter whether you think it's appropriate; it doesn't matter that you may be right. You are not allowed to violate 3RR. Period. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 12:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:16, 2 September 2006

Template:IPtalkblanking

ISP Info

inetnum:      81.58.29.88 - 81.58.29.95
netname:      VERSATEL-CUST-270170379
descr:        Versatel Internet customer Eoos Ventures VOF
country:      NL
admin-c:      VT1029-RIPE
tech-c:       VT1029-RIPE
status:       ASSIGNED PA
mnt-by:       Versanis-MNT
source:       RIPE # Filtered
role:           VT HOSTMASTER
address:        Hullenbergweg 101
address:        1101 CL  Amsterdam ZuidOost
address:        The Netherlands
remarks:        -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
remarks:        For ZON/Versatel consumer related abuse issues please contact abuse@versatel.nl
remarks:        For all other abuse issues please contact abuse@versatel.net
remarks:        -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
admin-c:        RVDK1-RIPE
tech-c:         RVDK1-RIPE
tech-c:         ROBH1-RIPE
nic-hdl:        VT1029-RIPE
remarks:        This is the Versatel hostmaster role
remarks:        Please direct all queries to this role and *not* to person objects
abuse-mailbox:  abuse@zonnet.nl
abuse-mailbox:  abuse@versatel.nl
abuse-mailbox:  abuse@versatel.net
mnt-by:         AS13127-MNT
source:         RIPE # Filtered
% Information related to '81.58.0.0/15AS13127'
route:        81.58.0.0/15
descr:        European Customer and internal transit prefix
origin:       AS13127
mnt-by:       AS13127-MNT
source:       RIPE # Filtered

Stop

Please stop blanking this page; if people really wanted to find out your information, they could always run a WHOIS. -- King of 22:06, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

3RR warning

You have violated the 3RR rule at Islamophobia. This says we may not undo another editor's work, in whole or in part, whether involving the same material or different material each time, more than three times in 24 hours. If you revert again, you may be reported and blocked from editing. Please review WP:3RR carefully. SlimVirgin 12:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

As I said, you need to read WP:3RR very carefully. Any undoing of another editor's work (including his/her reverts) in whole or in part counts as a revert, and you know you've done that more than three times in the last 24 hours. Therefore, you have violated 3RR. The only reason I haven't reported you so far is that I can't be bothered. But that will change if you do it again, so please don't, for both our sakes. SlimVirgin 12:10, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Okay, one last time. Read the policy. It doesn't matter what the content is; it doesn't matter whether you think it's appropriate; it doesn't matter that you may be right. You are not allowed to violate 3RR. Period. SlimVirgin 12:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)