Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:02, 30 August 2016

Welcome!

Welcome to Misplaced Pages, Beshogur! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rubbish computer and I have been editing Misplaced Pages for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Misplaced Pages:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rubbish computer 20:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Beshogur (talk) 00:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 18 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the BRICS page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

You're right, my bad. Beshogur (talk) 00:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Iraqi Kurdistan. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 09:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kirkuk Governorate. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. _Fortuna 19:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Noman Çelebicihan Batallion.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Noman Çelebicihan Batallion.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:58, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Unexplained revert

Could you please explain this revert here ? A Turkish source gave an updated claim on Turkish losses, and a Kurdish source gave an updated claim on Kurdish and Turkish losses. So, I updated both the previous Turkish claim on their own losses, and the previous Kurdish claim on both sides losses that was already in the infobox. We have been presenting both sides POV on the matter of losses per Misplaced Pages's policy on neutrality. EkoGraf (talk) 03:37, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Changing "PKK members" to "Kurdish fighters" is not neutrality, and please check your sources. Beshogur (talk) 11:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

I did check my sources, and if you did as well you would see the source was referring to dead YPS members as well, not just PKK. Even though the YPS was born out of the PKK as their youth wing, and considered part of the PKK by many (such as Turkey), they are still at least officially separate from the PKK and we have listed them as such in the beligerents section of the infobox. THAT is why I changed it from PKK members to Kurdish fighters, so it would include all Kurdish combatants. If that was your whole problem it wouldn't warrant a full revert of my whole edit. And I don't see how that change is not neutrality, and implying that I am non-neutral is a bit offensive and not per WP policy on assuming good faith from your fellow editors. EkoGraf (talk) 16:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Dersim massacre/rebellion

The point is the article is called the Dersim massacre. You can't just change the content without a change in name. Go to Misplaced Pages:Requested moves and follow the procedure there. I've just done that very thing. You also reverted sourced content, you didn't just replace the word massacre with the word rebellion. I've got no opinion on this, but the editor I first reverted is a new editor with a number of problems. Doug Weller talk 19:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Caucasus

Do not move Armenia to partially or unrecognized, it doesnt make sense. Partially means only in part; to a limited extent. How is one country out of close to 200 partially? Ninetoyadome (talk) 04:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Armenia is partially recognized, they're not recognized by Pakistan.

Pakistan was the first country along with Turkey to recognize Azerbaijan after its independence. Pakistan does not recognize Armenia and will never do so. We speak with one voice on NagornoKarabakh. On 14th March, 2008 we together passed the first Resolution 882 on Nagorno-Karabakh. Azerbaijan has supported us on Kashmir and we are thankful to you for that.

Senator Mushahid Hussain Sayed

Beshogur (talk) 14:06, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

You are deliberately ignoring the definition of the word partial. Pakistan is the only country out of close to 200 that doesnt recognize Armenia. http://defence.pk/threads/pakistan-the-only-country-not-recognizing-armenia.298703/. If you change the page again i will report you for vandalism to the mods. Ninetoyadome (talk) 16:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

You can do that.. Beshogur (talk) 18:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map. Erlbaeko (talk) 14:13, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Those villages were before sourced. Beshogur (talk) 14:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

You already said that, and I asked you where that source is. Ref. diff. Note that the burden is on you to demonstrate verifiability. Erlbaeko (talk) 14:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

By the way, You may be blocked from my Talk page without further warning the next time if you bother me again. Beshogur (talk) 18:37, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

AA2 advisory

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Template:Z33 Étienne Dolet (talk) 20:50, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mosul, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:10, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Don't delete things about Muslims on the Mosul article. Beshogur (talk) 21:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Mosul. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tigir:Er

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tigir:Er requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sunmist3 (talk) 19:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Reverted edit

Hello Beshogur,

why exactly did you revert me? Îlan/Yilanli was mentioned in the article I cited. But apart from that, I didn't change it, since it was only a claim by SDF. What I changed was the sign for Mankubah. This village north of Manbij isn't by far at the frontline anymore and there is no reason why the fighters of the SDF should have left it alone, especially if you regard the fact that it was already contested before.

Apart from that, thanks for your contributions on the map modules, they are definitely helpful.

Cheers, Ermanarich (talk) 23:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry if I have an fault. Thanks anyway. Beshogur (talk) 23:43, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Kurdish-Turkish conflict

This is a Turkish news agency (Anadolu Agency) and says 5,000 killed. This is an article in Turkish, distinguishing between killed, wounded and arrested, and says 5,000 killed (7,000 neutralized). I may be wrong, but that was also the stable version before your edit. If we are not understanding correctly, please explain on the talk page. Thanks, Nykterinos (talk) 21:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Okay I can understand you, but Turkish agencies uses Neutralized instead killed. There are big mistakes. Beshogur (talk) 21:14, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

So? Can I revert back to killed? Nykterinos (talk) 21:20, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Do it. Beshogur (talk) 23:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Syrian civil war map edit

Please check the talk page Talk:Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War, I've given my reasons for the change. --Ahmedo Semsurî (talk) 17:15, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Ref. Erlbaeko (talk) 13:21, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Mare' was captured by rebels in June, stop vandalizing.

There is a section on the talk page, here, where we are trying to work out that dispute. You can add your souces there. Further information: Achieving consensus through discussion. Erlbaeko (talk) 13:47, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Tuz Khurmatu

According to your own source there is an agreement to withdraw all forces and hand over town to local police. So why should that be marked as red? If anything the town has always been administered by kurds and the mayor is kurdish. So if one color is chosen it should be yellow. Best option is to mark as joint unless you want to make a new color to explain "local police force". Mozad655 (talk) 16:21, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

There isn't Kurdish police in Iraq, so the local police is the police of the central gov't. Beshogur (talk) 16:46, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

There is kurdish police in all kurdish areas. Why do you assume its the local police of the central gov't and not the KRG? Mayor is kurdish and town has been under kurdish adminstration since 2003. If they are under central gov't there would be no point in an "agreement" from a peshmerga perspective, as it would constitute surrendering the town to the central gov't which is unheard of. The local police by logical intuition must be local, non-partisan and seperate from main iraqi-police which is really just a formality as Iraq is not organized and army/police/millitias are all the same. Millitias might aswell not have left then. Do you get my point? Mozad655 (talk) 23:23, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Jarabulus is still contested according to SOHR

Hello you reverted my edit on the module of Syrian civil war. SOHR is frequently used as a source by news organisations as it gives unbiased info. Besides why do you think that something is true simply based on an official claim by a government. Undeniably SOHR can be considered more reliable and neutral than an official statement of a government. I hope you will understand this and will revert your edit. Thank you very much. Newsboy39 (talk) 20:04, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

I don't care about SOHR. Because I trust in the anouncment of the state. + There were dozens of videos about Jarablus city center. Get your facts. Beshogur (talk) 20:07, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

That's biased editing. If Syria annouced it captured Aleppo will you believe it? SOHR is one of the most reliable sources of the conflict. If you don't revert I'll have to revert you. Newsboy39 (talk) 20:10, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Ok, sorry then, my fault. Beshogur (talk) 20:13, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Mere videos of the city centre does not mean "the whole city" is under control. Areas in a city can still be under control of others. Seems you did not understand it properly. Besidea I see you have realised your mistake. Can you please self-revert now? Newsboy39 (talk) 20:15, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

I'll do. Beshogur (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Notice of the Syrian Civil War sanctions

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Erlbaeko (talk) 17:30, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Your edits on Jarabulus offensive (2016)

You've now added information that is not in source for 2 times. Your recent addition of Ismail Ahwaz as commander of FSA in Jarabulus offensive is not in source. The source you used doesn't even mention Jarabulus nor that Ismail Ahwaz is the commander of the offensive. In actual it's mentioning Ahwaz being the commander during the battle for al-Rai. I ask you to please revert your edit as it is effectively unsourced. Newsboy39 (talk) 17:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Fixed. Beshogur (talk) 18:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Next time please don't add something until the source actually says what you're adding, otherwise it will be effectively unsourced. If you want to add an FSA commander for the Jarabulus offensive, I suggest you find a source that explicitily says which person is commanding the FSA in the Jarabulus offensive. Newsboy39 (talk) 18:26, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Syrian Civil War

Merhabalar kardeşim büyük ihtimal Türksün biliyorum.Bu amk kekolarına göz açtırmayalım. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skyline12399 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Be warned on edit-warring!

I've noticed in recent days you are engaged in an aggressive edit-warring and frequent reverting and in some cases distorting of sourced material. Consider this as a warning, as you may be in danger of being blocked (hopefully not). Roboskiye (talk) 17:56, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Hey you can't hide the Turkmen nationality in Syria. The name of the village is in Turkmen language, so it has nothing to do with Kurds. Kurd means wolf, not Kurd. Beshogur (talk) 18:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Beshogur, do not call others racist especially without giving satisfactory evidence that clearly shows any sign of racism. Making false allegations against others and calling them racist can get you blocked. Newsboy39 (talk) 18:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Jarabulus offensive (2016)

I just wanted to say that I did not add the content you undid and told me about on my talk page. User:Berkaysnklf did add that info. Applodion (talk) 21:45, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry my fault. Beshogur (talk) 21:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

No problem ;) Applodion (talk) 22:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Battle of al-Hasakah (2016)

Beshogur, as I already stated, it doesn't matter what we think. The sources say it is a Kurdish victory, so it is a Kurdish victory. That is how wikipedia works; all statements have be based of sources. The sources for the Battle of al-Hasakah (2016) clearly state that this was a Kurdish victory, so we HAVE to mention it. I do not want to dispute your opinion on the matter, or if the battle was really a victory. As long as the sources state it, we have to include it, even if we disagree with them - especially if (more or less) neutral sources like SOHR and Reuters say it was a Kurdish victory. So please refrain from undoing the "Kurdish victory". Applodion (talk) 13:57, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Amarinah

Hi you just changed Amarinah to OPP but did not provide source. Can you provide source to that edit if its true so others don't change it and also change the radio tower facility to OPP since it is behind Amarinah. Mozad655 (talk) 16:41, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

I didn't change it to opp, I just did opp_N, which means opp attacked Amarinah from north. But there's a problem with the template i guess.

Edit: look

Beshogur (talk) 16:58, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

al-Rai

You claimed al-Rai is still rebel heldusing this source: (http://t24.com.tr/haber/abd-cerablusa-hava-destegi-vermiyor-isid-el-nusra-gibi-isim-degistirebilir,357209). However it doesn't mention al-Rai even once. Also your other claim of FSA capturing 3 villages, it could have been simply overtaken by rebels who were sent from across the border just like Jarabulus or rebels still present or near the area. Regardless, we're not here to deliberate on what's possible or not. That is self-interpretation which is not allowed on Misplaced Pages. Since you have no source for your claim, I request you to please revert your edit. Misrepresentation of sources and removal of sourced content with wrong claims is not allowed. Newsboy39 (talk) 21:26, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Also the source (https://twitter.com/markito0171/status/769479419303960576) you used earlier for reverting al-Rai back to rebel control does not even mention al-Rai. That seems like a deliberate misrepresentation of sources. Please self-revert your edit and show al-Rai under IS control. What you are doing is not good and is not allowed. Newsboy39 (talk) 21:30, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

There's no crossing. That's one. 2: Don't use Google Translate. The sentence is here about al-Rai: Ve aylardır IŞİD karşısında milim ilerleyemeyen bu gruplar, bir haftada Ar Rai’nin karşısındaki Çobanbey’e kadar geldi. Beshogur (talk) 21:33, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

I forgot the other name of al-Rai was Çobanbey but there's no mention of it being recaptured by FSA. You still haven't provided any source that says what you claim and seem to be misinterpreting them. Please undo your edit. Newsboy39 (talk) 21:41, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Hassan Ridha is a reliable source. Beshogur (talk) 21:47, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Then you should self-revert twice because you still used sources that didn't say what you claimed, that is not allowed. When you revert yourself for the second time you should mention your recent source which you have shown me. Newsboy39 (talk) 21:58, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Ok revert it, I don't care. But you will see, some hours later other users will change it to m.opp. Beshogur (talk) 22:07, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

I meant you can keep it "m.opp" but you have to mention your Twitter source in the edit summary. That's why I said "self-revert twice" and not just "self-revert". You should revert the first time because the source you provided in earlier edits didn't say what you claimed. Then you have to revert the same revert mentioning your recent Twitter source which says al-Rai is under rebel control, thus you al-Rai will remain under rebel control in the module and you will have provided a reliable source as well. That's what I was saying, you misunderstood me. Newsboy39 (talk) 22:33, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Blind reverting

This sort of thing is not conducive to proper editing. There is an ongoing discussion about this content on the article's talk page, and sound reasons have been presented as to why this content is unsuitable, Yet you chose to ignore that, chose to make no contribution to the talk page, chose to not even give an edit summary explanation. If you are not already aware of it, editors on all Armenia related topics can be subject to sanctions beyond that of other articles if their editing behavior falls below acceptable standards. I suggest you revert yourself, and present your arguments on the talk page. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

1. https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/rebels-advance-rapidly-amid-full-scale-isis-retreat-northern-aleppo-map-update/
2. http://qasioun.net/en/news/show/28405/Opposition_break_the_siege_by_ISIS_on_Mare%E2%80%99a
3. http://www.syriahr.com/2016/06/08/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%84-%D8%AA%D9%86%D9%81%D8%B0-%D9%87%D8%AC%D9%88%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%8B-%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%83%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%8B-%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%A8-%D9%85%D8%AF%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A9/
4. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-northwest-idUSKCN0YU0PT
5. https://twitter.com/sayed_ridha/status/769441072825061376