| Revision as of 11:22, 28 September 2016 editUnderbar dk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers36,785 edits gr8 b8 m8← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:43, 28 September 2016 edit undoSk8erPrince (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,601 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| ===]=== | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|Category}} | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''keep'''. Nomination withdrawn. (]) ] (]) 11:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :{{la|Nobuyo Ōyama}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | :{{la|Nobuyo Ōyama}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 17: | ||
| *Go on, say what you're going to say. "Top of the industry"? Where's your source that supports your claim? Your claim isn't validated just because you think she is notable. Is that an empty claim that I could just dismiss? You could be a veteran VA, and STILL not be notable (See ] and ). I nominated the subject because she is only notable for two things; there is PLENTY of room to doubt her notability. I choose not to nominate Megumi nor Kotono because both of them have WAY more significant roles that nominating them for deletion is beyond ridiculous. --] (]) 09:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC) | *Go on, say what you're going to say. "Top of the industry"? Where's your source that supports your claim? Your claim isn't validated just because you think she is notable. Is that an empty claim that I could just dismiss? You could be a veteran VA, and STILL not be notable (See ] and ). I nominated the subject because she is only notable for two things; there is PLENTY of room to doubt her notability. I choose not to nominate Megumi nor Kotono because both of them have WAY more significant roles that nominating them for deletion is beyond ridiculous. --] (]) 09:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ::Doraemon is a global cultural icon beyond EVA, we should not have to descend to your level of trolling or ignorance to satisfy whatever you're trying to achieve here (nothing beneficial, I'm sure). You've said elsewhere you didn't even do the bare minimum while looking for things to delete, and that you don't bother searching for Japanese sources because you don't understand the language. Well, ] There are pages of articles of Oyama both in and That you have no idea what you are doing nor have you made the bare minimum to gauge her notability puts you in a very negative light. In my opinion, your drive-by nominations in this nature have been nothing but disruptive. This is the best reply I can do politely, the impolite version would just be two words. ] (]) 11:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC) | ::Doraemon is a global cultural icon beyond EVA, we should not have to descend to your level of trolling or ignorance to satisfy whatever you're trying to achieve here (nothing beneficial, I'm sure). You've said elsewhere you didn't even do the bare minimum while looking for things to delete, and that you don't bother searching for Japanese sources because you don't understand the language. Well, ] There are pages of articles of Oyama both in and That you have no idea what you are doing nor have you made the bare minimum to gauge her notability puts you in a very negative light. In my opinion, your drive-by nominations in this nature have been nothing but disruptive. This is the best reply I can do politely, the impolite version would just be two words. ] (]) 11:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :::Trolling my foot. I don't need the likes of you to tell what I should do and I should not do. And I also don't need you to tell me whether or not I've been disruptive as of late. That certainly isn't for YOU to decide, are we clear? Granted, I am new to this, but when an AFD is made, YOU are to make your assertions clear, do you understand? All your bold statements aren't relevant arguments to state your case. Angus already told me what I should do, anyway. He's a good fella (unlike you). I don't need your opinion, so you can get off of my case, OR stay away from my nominations. I'm in need of more capable voters anyway (yeah, that means NOT YOU) Anyway, seeing as Angus has provided siginificant sources for the subject, I'll see to it that the AFD be withdrawn. --] (]) 11:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Revision as of 11:43, 28 September 2016
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Sk8erPrince (talk) 11:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nobuyo Ōyama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only major roles are Monokuma and Doraemon. Little to no news coverage, and no reliable and strong sources. Subject's page should be deleted or redirected to Doraemon. Sk8erPrince (talk) 01:23, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Her 26 years as Doraemon ensure her notability. They even made a tv special about her life. .SephyTheThird (talk) 04:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Good source. Make sure to put it in the article, so that I may withdraw this AFD. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 04:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Passes Misplaced Pages's notability guidelines. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep - This article passes the WP:GNG. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep - Nominator states on their talk page that they are "very careful about choosing who to nominate for deletion" and will not nominate "VERY notable seiyu like Kotono Mitsuishi and Megumi Ogata". Yet goes to nominate a veteran seiyuu at the very top of the industry. I have no words. No polite ones at least. _dk (talk) 07:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Go on, say what you're going to say. "Top of the industry"? Where's your source that supports your claim? Your claim isn't validated just because you think she is notable. Is that an empty claim that I could just dismiss? You could be a veteran VA, and STILL not be notable (See Mark Stoddard and Ed Blaylock). I nominated the subject because she is only notable for two things; there is PLENTY of room to doubt her notability. I choose not to nominate Megumi nor Kotono because both of them have WAY more significant roles that nominating them for deletion is beyond ridiculous. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 09:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Doraemon is a global cultural icon beyond EVA, we should not have to descend to your level of trolling or ignorance to satisfy whatever you're trying to achieve here (nothing beneficial, I'm sure). You've said elsewhere you didn't even do the bare minimum while looking for things to delete, and that you don't bother searching for Japanese sources because you don't understand the language. Well, those are the things you are supposed to have done before nominating for deletion. There are pages of articles of Oyama both in English and Japanese That you have no idea what you are doing nor have you made the bare minimum to gauge her notability puts you in a very negative light. In my opinion, your drive-by nominations in this nature have been nothing but disruptive. This is the best reply I can do politely, the impolite version would just be two words. _dk (talk) 11:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Trolling my foot. I don't need the likes of you to tell what I should do and I should not do. And I also don't need you to tell me whether or not I've been disruptive as of late. That certainly isn't for YOU to decide, are we clear? Granted, I am new to this, but when an AFD is made, YOU are to make your assertions clear, do you understand? All your bold statements aren't relevant arguments to state your case. Angus already told me what I should do, anyway. He's a good fella (unlike you). I don't need your opinion, so you can get off of my case, OR stay away from my nominations. I'm in need of more capable voters anyway (yeah, that means NOT YOU) Anyway, seeing as Angus has provided siginificant sources for the subject, I'll see to it that the AFD be withdrawn. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 11:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Doraemon is a global cultural icon beyond EVA, we should not have to descend to your level of trolling or ignorance to satisfy whatever you're trying to achieve here (nothing beneficial, I'm sure). You've said elsewhere you didn't even do the bare minimum while looking for things to delete, and that you don't bother searching for Japanese sources because you don't understand the language. Well, those are the things you are supposed to have done before nominating for deletion. There are pages of articles of Oyama both in English and Japanese That you have no idea what you are doing nor have you made the bare minimum to gauge her notability puts you in a very negative light. In my opinion, your drive-by nominations in this nature have been nothing but disruptive. This is the best reply I can do politely, the impolite version would just be two words. _dk (talk) 11:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.