Revision as of 01:37, 4 August 2005 editRcc105 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,840 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 04:23, 5 October 2016 edit undoBaldBoris (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Rollbackers55,046 editsmNo edit summary |
(26 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
# Attract more members: Leave invitations on talk pages, etc. |
|
# Attract more members: Leave invitations on talk pages, etc. |
|
|
# Clarify the project goals. |
|
# Cleanup ]: Change entries from links (especially those linked to non-cycling articles, such as eyelet and fender) to definition list (using ; and : wiki markup). |
|
|
|
# Maintain a minimal number of articles in ] (current number: {{PAGESINCATEGORY:Unassessed cycling articles}}) |
|
# Cleanup and consolidate the ]-related pages. Ongoing efforts include streamlining the various racing categories and classifications under the UCI. Particularly common mistakes include the different languages/spellings used for various races. |
|
|
|
# Identify articles ready for improvement to ] and ] standard. |
|
# Work through ] |
|
|
|
# Study ] for ideas to develop the project. |
|
# Make the point that recumbents are banned from Tour de France since 1934 and we shouldn't be riding diamond frames |
|
|
|
# Make standards for cycling team articles, cyclist biography articles, and cycling event articles. |
|
# Make the point that recumbents while exceeding the performance of conventional, or diamond framed bikes, in some situations, there are many situations in which they perform poorer. |
|
|
|
# Photographs for articles in ] and ] |
|
# Expand this to-do list. |
|
# Expand this to-do list.<!-- |
|
|
|
|
|
Please don't add specific comments here, but add them to the bottom of the main talk page |
|
|
|
|
|
--> |