Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:59, 17 November 2016

Simon Mugava (talk) 18:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Simon Mugava, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Misplaced Pages does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on spam
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest
• FAQ for Organizations

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Misplaced Pages:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Misplaced Pages! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Jbh 15:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Misplaced Pages as a "soapbox" are against Misplaced Pages policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Misplaced Pages. Thank you.Deb (talk) 19:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Uebert angel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Uebert angel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Uebert Angel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Uebert Angel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kleuske (talk) 14:18, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Uebert Angel

The article Uebert Angel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to fail WP:BIO or at least be minor enough to be borderline.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patar knight - /_{contributions} 14:32, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

I see that you have been editing the article on Simon Mugava. I would recommend that you read Misplaced Pages's guidance on conflict of interest and on autobiography. --David Biddulph (talk) 09:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.

When editing Misplaced Pages, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! 220 of 12:23, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of UEBERT ANGEL FOUNDATION

The article UEBERT ANGEL FOUNDATION has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable foundation.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KGirlTrucker81 15:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Misplaced Pages as a "soapbox" are against Misplaced Pages policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Misplaced Pages. Thank you.
Hello, Simon Mugava. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Misplaced Pages, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Misplaced Pages articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Misplaced Pages article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Misplaced Pages's content policies.

No relation just a topic of interest to meSimon Mugava (talk) 17:57, 7 November 2016 (UTC) In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID)

Please take a few moments to read and review Misplaced Pages's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.Deb (talk) 16:22, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Santi Cazorla, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 04:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Please don't misplace an external link in the article text, as you did in this edit. I have turned it into a reference, see Help:Referencing for beginners, and then cured the fact that it was a bare url. --David Biddulph (talk) 09:12, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. SmartSE (talk) 12:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Language like "a massive business empire with a broad range of interests which continues to grow" is very far from being neutral and despite your statement that you do not have a conflict of interest, certainly makes it seem as if you do and are here to promote Mr Angel. Please do not continue to add language like this to the article. SmartSE (talk) 12:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

There is certainly no conflict of interest. It is an article that I'm interested I'm working on it. I have also other religious leaders that I'm going to start working on. It's a shame the world does not want to acknowledge them but they acknowledge pointless creatures e.g octopus, a place etc not world leaders. Simon Mugava (talk) 13:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Notice: discretionary sanctions relevant to your editing of Uebert Angel and related pages

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Template:Z33

I have in all fairness addressed why I'm interested in editing this page. We are saying the same thing with other editors. Just that other editors are preferring to start with other topics. Other editors also agree that the person is definitely worth talking about on wikipedia. I request this to be removed on my talk page.Simon Mugava (talk) 18:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

You can remove it yourself if you like, but please read it carefully first. (Removal of a post from your page is allowed, but it's taken as proof that you have read it.) I have posted it because the warnings you have received don't seem to have impressed you much. If you don't start collaborating with others and listening to what more experienced editors tell you about sourcing and other policies, you run the risk of being topic banned from the article. That would mean you wouldn't be allowed to edit it any more. Bishonen | talk 18:53, 17 November 2016 (UTC).

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Misplaced Pages, as you did with this edit to Uebert Angel. RA0808 _contribs 19:44, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

(edit conflict) After the notice above (time: 18:16), you edit-warred your preferred version back into the article (time: 18:34) without a single word on the talk page. I've taken the time to explain the problems with your edit on the talk page. Please read the points I've made and let's try to move forward collaboratively. I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt on the timing of your last edit relative to the above notice, but if you insist on trying to edit-war your preferred text into the article again, or fail to engage on the talk page when objections are raised, I will request Bishonen to topic ban you from this article. --RexxS (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

I have raised my concerns already concerning this article. How come other editors are not being banned its just me? I'm pointing out facts that exist and they have citation. Just because one or 2 editors feel it's not right or they want to start with religion side not business doesn't mean all is not true. If anything we all know its true about this individual so lets work to make this article better not war edit.Simon Mugava (talk) 23:44, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You have been indefinitely topic banned from Uebert Angel and all related pages. Please read the topic ban policy to see what a "topic ban" is.

You have been sanctioned for continuing your tendentious editing of Uebert Angel, after being alerted to the discretionary sanctions in force for biography articles, and without taking any notice of what people tell you on the article talkpage or indeed on your own user talkpage. For example, this post warned you against cherrypicking nice-sounding phrases which do not represent the source accurately, but unfortunately you ignored it, didn't post any response on the talkpage, but instead simply reinserted the very same "nice" phrases. That's just one example of your disruptive editing of this article. I realize you are a new user who doesn't know much about Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, but when a new user persistently ignores information about those policies and guidelines and keeps wasting other editors' time, with no signs of improvement or good will, they will eventually be removed from the article they disrupt. If you violate this topic ban, you will be blocked from editing.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 20:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Bishonen | talk 20:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC).

Topic ban violation

Simon, topic banned means you're not allowed to edit the article or its talkpage at all any longer. You have violated your topic ban from Uebert Angel and related pages with this edit. If you do it again, you will be blocked from editing. Bishonen | talk 23:08, 17 November 2016 (UTC).

November 2016