| Revision as of 13:13, 20 November 2016 editSephyTheThird (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers3,691 edits →A message of peace: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:12, 21 November 2016 edit undoSephyTheThird (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers3,691 edits clearly you have no interest in backing down and working something out so this offer is withdrawnNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| I've noticed that you have nominated some articles for AFD without using edit summaries. You should use edit summaries for all edits, but it is especially important to use them when nominating an article for deletion, as that is something that anyone watching the article would want to notice. ] lists some specific edit summaries that you can use in each step of the process of nominating an article. ] (]) 04:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC) | I've noticed that you have nominated some articles for AFD without using edit summaries. You should use edit summaries for all edits, but it is especially important to use them when nominating an article for deletion, as that is something that anyone watching the article would want to notice. ] lists some specific edit summaries that you can use in each step of the process of nominating an article. ] (]) 04:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == A message of peace == | |||
| Look, I'll just cut to the chase. | |||
| I'll be very happy to work with you, but it requires both of us to start again. If you are going to continue to handle afd's like you have been it's going to be difficult for either of us to get on with it as we should be. Please accept that policy or not, these instant renominations look bad and will attract criticism. It takes away from the debate about the article contents and instead becomes a matter of principles and good practice. I don't intentionally try to block your afd's but some of them have provided significant concerns. The inability to accept this and instead retaliate is what has gotten us both into this situation. Also, other people have raised concerns with you so surely this suggests that a step back is in order? | |||
| I'd rather not argue with you constantly but it requires both of us to do something about it. Carrying on won't do either of us, or the project any good. However if you cannot accept your share of the responsibility then no progress will be made. Please think carefully about this.] (]) 13:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:12, 21 November 2016
Hi.
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
At the village pump
I started a section regarding the appropriateness of draft namespace to draft AfD nominations because I wanted clarification about it after seeing that you have created three AfD nominations in draft namespace. I pinged you, but I would like to also notify you about it here. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 15:15, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, I wasn't really sure which type of drafts I should be making, so I went ahead and made namespace drafts instead of userspace ones. I'll make drafts using the latter method from now on. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 09:36, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, it's no problem really. It's just I noticed, and I become extremely curious about it myself since I've only ever seen the draft namespace through my occasional patrolling through WP:AFC. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 21:04, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Lindsey Eaton in Kill la Kill
The on-screen credits and the cast announcement say Lindsey Eaton is the voice of Mataro in Kill la Kill. You'll need to find some news articles that confirm she is the alias for Philece Sampler. ANN doesn't do a good enough job to connect the aliases. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:23, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- That, or a confirmation on Philece's Twitter. Right? --Sk8erPrince (talk) 01:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Use of edit summaries
Hi Sk8erPrince,
I've noticed that you have nominated some articles for AFD without using edit summaries. You should use edit summaries for all edits, but it is especially important to use them when nominating an article for deletion, as that is something that anyone watching the article would want to notice. WP:AFDHOW lists some specific edit summaries that you can use in each step of the process of nominating an article. Calathan (talk) 04:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)