Misplaced Pages

Salim Suliman Al Harbi: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:22, 18 April 2010 editRjwilmsiBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Pending changes reviewers1,602,950 editsm fixing page range dashes using AWB← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:04, 13 December 2016 edit undoXqbot (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,327,610 editsm Bot: Fixing double redirect to List of Saudi detainees at Guantanamo Bay 
(19 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ] {{R from subtopic}}
{{USgovtPOV|date=January 2010}}
{{Cleanup-rewrite|date=January 2010}}
'''Salim Suliman Al Harbi'''
is a citizen of ] who was held in ] in the ] ]s, in ].<ref name=DoDList2> , '']'', May 15, 2006</ref>
His Guantanamo ] was 57.
] ] analysts report that he was born on November 22, 1968, in ], Saudi Arabia.

Salim Suliman al Harbi was transferred to Saudi Arabia on December 13, 2006.<ref name=The_Guantanamo_Docket>{{cite news|url=http://projects.nytimes.com/guantanamo/detainees/57-salim-suliman-al-harbi|title=Salim Suliman al Harbi – The Guantánamo Docket|work=]|publisher=]|accessdate=17 January 2010}}</ref>

==Combatant Status Review Tribunal==

Initially the ] ] asserted{{Fact|date=June 2008}} that they could withhold all the protections of the ] to captives from ]. This policy was challenged before the Judicial branch. Critics argued that the USA could not evade its obligation to conduct ]s to determine whether captives are, or are not, entitled to the protections of ] status.

Subsequently the ] instituted the ]s. The Tribunals, however, were not authorized to determine whether the captives were ''lawful combatants'' -- rather they were merely empowered to make a recommendation as to whether the captive had previously been correctly determined to match the Bush Presidency's definition of an ].

===Summary of Evidence memo===

A ] was prepared for
Salim Suliman Al Harbi's
Combatant Status Review Tribunal,
on 13 October 2004.<ref name=CsrtSummaryOfEvidenceSalimSulimanAlHarbi>
{{cite web
| url=http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/000001-000100.pdf#69
| title=Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal - Al Harbi, Salim Suliman
| date=13 October 2004
| author=]
| pages=page 69
| publisher=]
| accessdate=2007-11-25
}}</ref>
The memo listed the following allegations against him:
{{quotation|
:The detainee is associated with ]:
:#The detainee was identified by the Saudi Government as a priority target.
:#The detainee went to ] in 1990/1991 for ].
:#The detainee is associated with ].
:#Tablighi Jamaat]] is also known as Jama'at Tablighi.
:#Jama'at Al Tablighi, a ] based Islamic missionary organization is being used as a cover to mask travel and activities of terrorists including members of al Qaida.
:#The detainee was captured by Pakistani forces while trying to cross into Pakistan.
}}

===Transcript===

There is no record that Salim Suliman Al Harbi
chose to participate in his Combatant Status Review Tribunal.

==Administrative Review Board hearing==

] | pages=1 | author=Spc Timothy Book | date=Friday March 10, 2006 | accessdate=2007-10-10 }}</ref>]]

Detainees who were determined to have been properly classified as "enemy combatants" were scheduled to have their dossier reviewed at annual ] hearings. The Administrative Review Boards weren't authorized to review whether a detainee qualified for POW status, and they weren't authorized to review whether a detainee should have been classified as an "enemy combatant".

They were authorized to consider whether a detainee should continue to be detained by the United States, because they continued to pose a threat -- or whether they could safely be repatriated to the custody of their home country, or whether they could be set free.

===First annual Administrative Review Board===

A ] was prepared for Salim Suliman Al Harbi's first annual Administrative Review Board, on 1 June 2005.<ref name=ArbSummaryOfEvidenceSalimSulimanAlHarbi>
{{cite web
| url=http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB_Round_1_Factors_000001-000098.pdf#79
| title=Unclassified Summary of Evidence for Administrative Review Board in the case of Al Harbi, Salim Suliman
| date=1 June 2005
| author=]
| pages=pages 79–82
| publisher=]
| accessdate=2007-11-25
}}</ref>
The memo listed factors for and against his continued detention.

===Second annual Administrative Review Board===

A ] was prepared for Salim Suliman Al Harbi's second annual
Administrative Review Board, on 3 December 2004.<ref name=Arb2SummaryOfEvidenceSalimSulimanAlHarbi>
{{cite web
| url=http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB_Round_2_Factors_100-199.pdf#14
| title=Unclassified Summary of Evidence for Administrative Review Board in the case of Al Harbi, Salim Suliman
| date='''undated'''
| author=]
| pages=pages 14–16
| publisher=]
| accessdate=2007-11-25
}}</ref>
The memo listed factors for and against his continued detention.

===Board recommendations===

In early September 2007 the Department of Defense released two heavily redacted memos, from his Board, to ], the ].<ref name=ArbRecommendationIsn57>
{{cite web
| url=http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB_Round_2_Decision_memos_001-094.pdf
|format=PDF| title=Administrative Review Board assessment and recommendation ICO ISN 57
| date=July 31, 2006
| author=]
| publisher=]
| accessdate=2007-11-25
| pages=page 29
}}</ref><ref name=ArbBasisForRecommendationIsn57>
{{cite web
| url=http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB_Round_2_Decision_memos_001-094.pdf
|format=PDF| title=Classified Record of Proceedings and basis of Administrative Review Board recommendation for ISN 57
| date=April 4, 2006
| author=]
| publisher=]
| accessdate=2007-11-25
| pages=pages 30–38
}}</ref>

==References==
{{reflist|2}}

<!--
The following categories contain articles about individuals who almost
all have names that follow the style for Arabic names.
Arabic names don't have European style surnames that are inherited, father to son.
So, there is no point changing the order in which they are sorted in the categories.

Thanks!
-->

]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 10:04, 13 December 2016

Redirect to: