Revision as of 04:46, 28 December 2016 editJunosoon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,316 edits Adding tagging to rescue article← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:50, 28 December 2016 edit undoJunosoon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,316 edits Adding commentNext edit → | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
*'''Delete''' There is nothing notable in raids conducted by Income Tax Department in a particular year. It does not warrant a separate page. At best merge into ]] (]) 11:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' There is nothing notable in raids conducted by Income Tax Department in a particular year. It does not warrant a separate page. At best merge into ]] (]) 11:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
::{{ping|ChunnuBhai}} Did You check g hits, of Income Tax raids before commenting on notability. ] (]) 04:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) | ::{{ping|ChunnuBhai}} Did You check g hits, of Income Tax raids before commenting on notability. ] (]) 04:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
*''' Comment''' : The article has been addressed with issues of Content forking, notability issues and Not Newspaper, further improvements are welcomed.] (]) 04:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:50, 28 December 2016
Income Tax Department (India) raids 2016-2017
- Income Tax Department (India) raids 2016-2017 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Junosoon (talk) 04:46, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
A partial spinoff of a section of Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation bolstered into an article.I find little encycloepadic value of a list of all the persons who were raided by IT dept. oficials in a particular year.Misplaced Pages is not a chronological repository of all income tax raids performed in a particular time duration in a region and the details of the money thus recovered.and the raids are a notable aspect! Will the article-creator create similar articles about the income-tax raids that has taken place every year? Bombarding an article with numerous WP:RS hardly points to any notabilty on such general issues.Also see WP:NOTNEWS.Light 10:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC) Light 08:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Light 08:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Light 08:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Disagree : This article is about Income Tax raids,financial year 2016-2017 not just after 8 November 2016. 8 November 2016, notification has nothing to with Income Tax Raids, that notification was limited to legal character of banknote.
This article covers details about, raids conducted by Income Tax Department, which is an official work of Income Tax Department,.Junosoon (talk) 08:40, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Junosoon:-Maybe, you can start a page about all the incidents of thefts etc. that happened in India.(They are well reported by WP:RS and there are official investigations into every one of them by the concerned police department!)Light 10:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Request to nominator: I think this is borderline disruptive or Misplaced Pages:Competence is required, on nomination as Misplaced Pages:Content forking is not an eligible reason to nominated for deletion, the nominator can share views/ issues on talk page of article, which are welcomed if any improvement to article is needed.Junosoon (talk) 09:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Junosoon:-Well, I may be incompetent-at least definitely in my failure to bring every little issue to the WP:ANI!Light 10:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC).
- @Winged Blades of Godric: Is this some sort of personal attack, you are creating here
little issue to the WP:ANI
, I think if that is the reason of your nomination!, it is getting very messy.If you have any personal problem discuss on talk page, or article talk page .Junosoon (talk) 11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)- @Junosoon:-There's a difference between sarcasm and personal attack! Let us not go off-topic but wait for the consensus of the community on the issue.Light 11:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Winged Blades of Godric: Is this some sort of personal attack, you are creating here
- Strong delete as NOTNEWS. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 23. —Talk to my owner:Online 22:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as a redundant content fork and per WP:NOTNEWS. The article does not cover an actual notable coordinated law enforcement operation, but rather a list of raids that happened to be in the same time period (no surprise there). We already have an article on the overarching event and it's Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation (specifically, sections #Effects and aftermath and #Evasion attempts). Daß Wölf 00:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Article under construction. In light of above discussion, the content forking complain
A partial spinoff of a section of Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation
has been addressed, by removing it from article. The new sections are under construction, and will reimproved as per discussion. Thanks for your cooperation. Junosoon (talk) 03:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Strong merge into Income Tax Department and create a redirect as this will benefit both the articles. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 03:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete There is nothing notable in raids conducted by Income Tax Department in a particular year. It does not warrant a separate page. At best merge into Income Tax DepartmentChunnuBhai (talk) 11:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- @ChunnuBhai: Did You check g hits, of Income Tax raids before commenting on notability. Junosoon (talk) 04:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment : The article has been addressed with issues of Content forking, notability issues and Not Newspaper, further improvements are welcomed.Junosoon (talk) 04:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)