| Revision as of 01:32, 29 January 2017 editMz7 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators77,684 edits →Notice: new sectionTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:09, 29 January 2017 edit undoAd Orientem (talk | contribs)Administrators76,575 edits →Milo Yiannopoulos (again): new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | ||
| ] (]) 01:32, 29 January 2017 (UTC) | ] (]) 01:32, 29 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == Milo Yiannopoulos (again) == | |||
| {{stop}} Please stop your ]. Multiple editors have appealed to you to ] but you seem deaf to both consensus and the appeals of your fellow editors to stop wasting everybody's time. I don't know what else to do, so I'm putting you on notice that if you continue on this path you are courting a ]. You should treat this as a final warning. -] (]) 18:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:09, 29 January 2017
Hello!
A friendly word of caution
Tread carefully on Milo Yiannopoulos. Your editing history is suggestive of someone with an agenda bordering on obsession. And remember that 1RR is in effect. I've already reminded Bradv. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- I notice that the category you are trying to insert identifies Milo as being of Jewish descent vice Jewish. That said my reading of the recent talk page discussion suggests a very strong consensus against introducing something which looks like a backdoor attempt to claiming he's a Jew. If you want to pursue this (which I advise against) you need to do it on the talk page. I suppose you could post an RfC, though I doubt it will go in your favor. In the meantime I must insist you stop trying to insert references to his being Jewish or of Jewish ancestry without consensus from the talk page. Please remember that this article is subject to discretionary sanctions. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Notice
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Mz7 (talk) 01:32, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Milo Yiannopoulos (again)
Please stop your tendentious editing. Multiple editors have appealed to you to drop the stick but you seem deaf to both consensus and the appeals of your fellow editors to stop wasting everybody's time. I don't know what else to do, so I'm putting you on notice that if you continue on this path you are courting a topic ban. You should treat this as a final warning. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)