Misplaced Pages

Template:Did you know nominations/Carmo Planetarium: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

< Template:Did you know nominations Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 12:16, 7 January 2017 editMike Peel (talk \| contribs)Administrators74,768 edits + reviewed← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:34, 5 February 2017 edit undoCwmhiraeth (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators138,708 edits Passed for DYKNext edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:
	-->		-->
	* ... that the ''']''' (''pictured'') in ], Brazil, opened in 2005, and uses 9,000 optical fibres and 109 lenses to portray the night sky?		* ... that the ''']''' (''pictured'') in ], Brazil, opened in 2005, and uses 9,000 optical fibres and 109 lenses to portray the night sky?
	** '''ALT1''':... that the ''']''' (''pictured'') in ], Brazil, opened in 2005, before closing for nearly ten years due to ]?		** '''ALT1''':<s>... that the ''']''' (''pictured'') in ], Brazil, opened in 2005, before closing for nearly ten years due to ]?</s>
	:* ''Reviewed'': ]		:* ''Reviewed'': ]
	:* ''Comment'': It might be possible to merge the DYK with ] if needed. I'm not sure if ALT1 is too negative, and/or it would be worth keeping back for use on ] 2017.		:* ''Comment'': It might be possible to merge the DYK with ] if needed. I'm not sure if ALT1 is too negative, and/or it would be worth keeping back for use on ] 2017.
Line 22:		Line 22:
	-->		-->

			:* ] This article is new enough and long enough. The original hook facts are cited inline to a reliable source, and being in Portuguese are accepted in good faith. I think ALT1 is too negative, and not funny enough for April 1st. The image is appropriately licensed, the article is neutral, and the Portuguese sources make checking for policy issues hard. ] (]) 10:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
	:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING :* -->

	{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->		{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 10:34, 5 February 2017

DYK toolbox
DYK check Reviewer instructions Earwig's Copyvio Detector QPQ check Character count Reviewers' template Hook length

Carmo Planetarium

(

) An aerial view of Carmo PlanetariumAn aerial view of Carmo Planetarium

... that the Carmo Planetarium (pictured) in São Paulo, Brazil, opened in 2005, and uses 9,000 optical fibres and 109 lenses to portray the night sky?
- ALT1:~~... that the Carmo Planetarium (pictured) in São Paulo, Brazil, opened in 2005, before closing for nearly ten years due to infiltration?~~

Reviewed: Sundial cannon
Comment: It might be possible to merge the DYK with Template:Did you know nominations/Professor Aristóteles Orsini Planetarium if needed. I'm not sure if ALT1 is too negative, and/or it would be worth keeping back for use on April Fools' Day 2017.

Created by Mike Peel (talk). Self-nominated at 08:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC).

This article is new enough and long enough. The original hook facts are cited inline to a reliable source, and being in Portuguese are accepted in good faith. I think ALT1 is too negative, and not funny enough for April 1st. The image is appropriately licensed, the article is neutral, and the Portuguese sources make checking for policy issues hard. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:

Pending DYK nominations

Template:Did you know nominations/Carmo Planetarium: Difference between revisions Add topic