Revision as of 09:20, 26 April 2016 editMayasutra (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,392 edits kautilya, please refrain from assumptions →Need to calm down← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:05, 4 April 2017 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,305,781 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Mayasutra/Archive 2) (bot | ||
(38 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|maxarchivesize = 75K | |maxarchivesize = 75K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 2 | ||
|minthreadsleft = 1 | |minthreadsleft = 1 | ||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Blocked == | |||
== Inappropriate comments, ] policy of wikipedia == | |||
See ] --] <sup>]</sup> 04:03, 4 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
@Mayasutra: ] is inappropriate behavior on wikipedia. Calling someone "childish" and making snarky personal attacks on article talk pages is not constructive. Please review ] as well as ], and respect community agreed guidelines on civility and proper use of article talk pages. Repeat of such behavior may invite an administrative review of your editing privileges. ] (]) 18:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::Please follow what you preach. You cannot extrapolate as you wish. I could do the same for your insulting remarks on claiming to threaten. Take care of your behavior and stick to the topic. It is obvious you are getting personal because you know Gonda is wrong in claiming mA in Sanskrit is mother and linking the root ma to maya without basis.--] (]) 18:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)Mayasutra | |||
== April 2016 == | |||
] Please do not ] other editors, as you did at ]. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> ] (]) 16:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
::::If that be the case, kindly ask Ms.Sarah Welch not to get personal; for ex: with claims on threatening, which is plain childish, silly, and serves no purpose. Thanks. --] (]) 13:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Mayasutra | |||
: | |||
: I see that you have now directly accused her of . That is unacceptable and I'll ask you to remove that personal attack immediately. --] (]) 20:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::It is obvious you have drawn lines and function on those without seeing reason. You should have asked Sarah Welch to take back claims on threatening; as mentioned above. Have . Let the admin take a call. BTW, am glad am not active on wiki or contributing to ]. If such is the way reasoning functions here, its not worth it. Thanks. --] (]) 06:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Mayasutra | |||
== Need to calm down == | |||
Hi Mayasutra, It seems that you are quite upset, and you probably need to take short break from this to calm down and take it easy. On the issue of making personal comments on others: | |||
* It should never be done on article talk pages, even though I would admit that I let a word a slip here or there. If you do so, you can always go back and strike off the comments for having done it in the heat of the moment. | |||
* You can complain to editors on their talk pages, on the talk pages of admins or on forums like ], but you should do so only with evidence, and be polite at all times. | |||
Ms Sarah Welch is an extremely talented Wikipedian, both in terms of her scholarship and her ability to write beautifully. She has numerous barnstars and GA articles to her credit. If you step back a little, you will learn to appreciate her editing as well as to enjoy it. Cheers, ] (]) 08:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
::::I shall use the language of RexxS which he did and . Ms Sarah Welch could well be a 'noble prize' winner. I cud not 'care a rat's ass' for those who behave like this. I suggest you refrain from assuming things about having to calm down. From the way Sarah Welch goes on offensives here, it is apparent who you need to lecture to (in Sarah Welch's language). What a great tactic, first make snarky personal attacks, then keep edging them on; so that when they retaliate she can use that for her POV pushing (which she wants without common consensus; as is clear). Anyways, I already left a note for you saying am done. So, you can now relax. Thank you. BTW, now I understand what some people have been saying about western historians; although so far had dismissed them for being rightwing. If, for such a trivial thing, pressure tactics are used by Sarah Welch and RexxS, I can understand what others deal with, having had it much harder in academic circles. Best wishes.--] (]) 09:19, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Mayasutra |
Latest revision as of 04:05, 4 April 2017
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Blocked
See Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Mayasutra --NeilN 04:03, 4 April 2017 (UTC)