Misplaced Pages

User talk:John Reid: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:50, 25 September 2006 editJohn Reid (talk | contribs)4,087 edits Mille Bornes: moved to the appropriate talk← Previous edit Revision as of 19:20, 27 September 2006 edit undoTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 edits Arbitration: Some of your activities have been raised on an arbitration caseNext edit →
Line 48: Line 48:
: ]] 05:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC) : ]] 05:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

==Arbitration==
Some of your activities have been raised on an arbitration case: ]. I'm notifying you, being the person who made the proposed finding of fact. --] 19:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:20, 27 September 2006

Please leave

Please get off of Misplaced Pages, your drivel and opinionated comments only anger most of us. You are NOT a productive editor, and you would best help Misplaced Pages by no longer being a part of our community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.247.220.37 (talkcontribs)

Thank you for your comment. You shall judge a man by his foes as well as by his friends. (Joseph Conrad)

You haven't responded to the above comment, but have only made a mockery of my request. Your choice of language, unwarranted and non factual criticism of VALUABLE Wikipedians gives your overall worth here a negative. Neither you or your opinions help the environment.... You are not a good person, you are a horrible editor and pretty much a contemptible, self-righteous, bigotted and hateful individual. Either change or leave. Your biased and ridiculous opinions have only caused an environment of shame. Your refusal to formally respond to these messages only proves that you are a coward, and do nothing but add shame to this encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.247.220.37 (talkcontribs)

Admin candidates please read this | All stakeholders in discussions please read this If you talk here, I'll reply here. If I talk there, please reply there. Archives:

There is a time to archive; and then there is a time to archive.


This section has no title

WP:DIG

Touring

Replied on my talk page. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Harsh Happy words

re comments by 131.247.220.37 (talk · contribs)

Thank you for your additional comment. I do not mock you; I have elevated your comment to page top (where it shall remain indefinitely). I think your comment is sufficiently important that all visitors to my page should read it first. You are starting to repeat yourself so, I'm sorry to say, unless you develop your themes I may start to move your comments off page to make room for other critics. You may, of course, vandalize my user page, like everybody else. I prefer the frankly pornographic edits.
You express an opinion and there is no way for me to refute that; your opinion is your own and I would never dare to question that. See /Opinion. Sauce for the goose, sauce for the gander. Should I argue with you? Insist you re-evaluate me? I'm content that you've expressed yourself directly; it is a courtesy few editors extend. As I read your first comment, I saw no occasion at all for reply and felt I went entirely far enough to quote Conrad. I still find myself speechless; I apologize if you find this insufficient. If you care to make a formal charge, I will formally respond.
Coward? I edit under cover of neither an anonymous IP nor a cute or arrogant pseudonym. Seeing the short list of contribs for your IP, all on articles I have never touched, I tend to guess that you are already involved in this project under another IP or handle; yet you choose to strike from darkness rather than reveal yourself. You certainly may edit articles anonymously and there is no policy forbidding anonymous, unsigned comments on talk -- but I do promise you that I will give greater weight to any signed comment. That's just me.
Perhaps you are incensed that I do not take you at your word and depart forthwith. Sorry; you have not yet reached my threshold of pain. Take heart; I have good paying work stacking up and I may just not have time to meddle here. And who knows? Some admin may take it into his head to block me forever -- and considering the return on my investment, I should consider that a favor.
So, since this may be my last edit forever, let me close with a few happy words (and notes):
If you wanted a man to encourage the van,
Or harass the foe from the rear,
Storm fort or redoubt, you had only to shout
for Abdul Abulbul Amir.
"Young man," quote Abdul,"has life grown so dull
That you wish to end your career?
Vile infidel know, you have trod on the toe
Of Abdul Abulbul Amir.
There's a tomb rises up where the Blue Danube rolls,
And graved there in characters clear,
Is, "Stranger, when passing, oh pray for the soul
Of Abdul Abulbul Amir."
John Reid 05:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Arbitration

Some of your activities have been raised on an arbitration case: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Giano/Workshop. I'm notifying you, being the person who made the proposed finding of fact. --Tony Sidaway 19:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC)