Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:25, 4 July 2017

General sanctions on Syrian Civil War and ISIL-related articles

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--Bbb23 (talk) 22:36, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

WP:GS/SCW&ISIL block

Reminder to administrators: Community sanctions are enacted by community consensus. In order to overturn this block, you must either receive the approval of the blocking administrator or consensus at a community noticeboard (you may need to copy and paste their statement to a community noticeboard).

@Chilicheese22: Yep, requesting page protection with a hypocritical explanation moments after reverting to your preferred version, stay classy. You're adding fuel to my future complaint at one of those drama boards, that I would love to avoid using, but unfortunately I don't see other solutions because I'm tired of trying to sift reason through your impenetrable skull. Your latest response at YCW TP is very disappointing, being a hodgepodge of ad hominem and guilt by association fallacies, as well as another garbage attempt at escaping substantiating your mass deletions of standard reliable sources. You could as well delete 100% of the article and then ask me to type a full rationale for every single one of the 319 refs of the article as to permit using them. Misplaced Pages doesn't work this way - the burden is yours - get it ffs. If you cannot account for your empty claims regarding every specific RS you've deleted - sucks to be you then, considering your stubbornness. --ContraVentum (talk) 15:47, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Chilicheese22 (talk) 01:29, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Personal attacks

Per this report at ANI. EdJohnston (talk) 22:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Let me tell you this

@Bb223: First off a rant: If this kind of behavior by Chilicheese22 is tolerated by the WP administration, I promise I will never in a million years offer an apology. I've until now been very lenient in my responses to CC22s constant flow of personal attacks and other abuse against me, while I've been trying to divert the discourse onto it's correct direction, i.e. debating the usability of the sources, that CC22 had deleted. But I've got the impression now that behaving like an asshole while canvassing sympathy among administrators is unfortunately an effective way of getting something through on Misplaced Pages. And thus, another case of dispute resolution was drowned in Misplaced Pages's infinite bureaucracy.

Secondly and importantly, what is yet annoying me is that any interaction with other people than CC22 has never touched the actual dispute of the article, but has always been about implementing various bureaucratic measures derived from the insurmountable number of policies, essays, norms, noticeboards and whatnot of WP. The majority of the talks in the dispute were concerning everything else than the actual issues of the stated sources of the YCW article, which is an unacceptable fraction for me personally. I've never expected editing on WP to be simple, but unfortunately this is just a mess I've lost the energy to participate into. I'm wondering if CC22's deletions are going to be left unnoticed permanently. I'll finally say that this stuff is not really something for me, as there's a certain limit of the amount of abuse I'll listen to in a discussion about a topic, that really ought to be kept simple and on point. This dispute has run for several months without any results.. Somebody else might hopefully take over the case, as this has proven unfruitful to me. Good luck to those who'll do so. I hope you understand my actions, at least. --ContraVentum (talk) 23:29, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

It's also interesting that Chilicheese22, considering his own misbehavior, is tarnishing me with "inability to work with others" and "not doing anything beneficial to articles related to the Syrian Civil War (i.e. Yemeni Civil War)" (lol), proposing all kinds of punishments imaginable in his vengeful pea brain. Yet nobody bothers to take a look at the content of the dispute on the article and the progress of events, but only respond to the sight through a keyhole, that CC22 has presented. Good grief. It's rather kind of amusing to me, having reconsidered the reputation of Misplaced Pages, which I previously held in high regard. My mistake. --ContraVentum (talk) 00:11, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

@Abequinn14: Are you Chilicheese22's lawyer or what? I do contribute to other stuff as well, surprise!, especially through my IP address 176.23.1.95, proof at . You would know that if you'd been following the dispute from the beginning instead of interfering in something that's not your business considering your ignorance of what's been taking place. The funniest thing is that you're defending an account literally dedicated to fighting me on the YCW article, see his contribs . Keep quiet if you're taking side while you don't understand what you're talking about, sonnyboy. --ContraVentum (talk) 00:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)