Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Norma Stitz (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:28, 23 August 2017 editKGirlTrucker81 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers64,703 edits →Norma Stitz: Closed as speedy keep (XFDcloser)← Previous edit Revision as of 12:40, 23 August 2017 edit undoHillbillyholiday (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,577 edits Undid revision 796850544 by KGirlTrucker81 (talk)Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''speedy keep'''. Clearly meets GNG and PORNBIO; no valid reason for deletion and therefore closing per WP:SK#1. <small>]</small> ] ] 12:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norma Stitz}}</ul></div> <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norma Stitz}}</ul></div>
:{{la|Norma Stitz}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) :{{la|Norma Stitz}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
Line 15: Line 9:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <font face="Bradley Hand ITC">]</font><sup>]</sup> 01:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <font face="Bradley Hand ITC">]</font><sup>]</sup> 01:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)</small>
*'''Speedy keep''' No reason for deletion has been provided, unless breast size is considered an argument. Clearly has the necessary coverage to satisfy notability requirements. —&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 10:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC) *'''Speedy keep''' No reason for deletion has been provided, unless breast size is considered an argument. Clearly has the necessary coverage to satisfy notability requirements. —&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 10:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I have reverted {{u|KGirlTrucker81}}'s speedy close. --] (]) 12:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
*'''Delete''' I hadn't got round to providing a reason yet, sorry. (Kinda thought it was obvious but..) Just because a person receives some coverage does not make them ], nor does having big breasts make someone suitable subject for an encyclopedia. The only possibly useable source I can see bar Guinness is Huffpo. And Huffpo is shite. Fuck GNG and PR0NNBIO. This article is an embarrassment. --] (]) 12:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Revision as of 12:40, 23 August 2017

Norma Stitz

AfDs for this article:
Norma Stitz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently "Norma" has the largest breasts in the world. That's it. The last AfD was started in 2004. --Hillbillyholiday (talk) 01:18, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 01:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 01:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep No reason for deletion has been provided, unless breast size is considered an argument. Clearly has the necessary coverage to satisfy notability requirements. — MShabazz /Stalk 10:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment I have reverted KGirlTrucker81's speedy close. --Hillbillyholiday (talk) 12:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete I hadn't got round to providing a reason yet, sorry. (Kinda thought it was obvious but..) Just because a person receives some coverage does not make them notable, nor does having big breasts make someone suitable subject for an encyclopedia. The only possibly useable source I can see bar Guinness is Huffpo. And Huffpo is shite. Fuck GNG and PR0NNBIO. This article is an embarrassment. --Hillbillyholiday (talk) 12:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Categories: