| Revision as of 17:10, 26 August 2017 editRexxS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers43,075 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on Scuba set. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:13, 26 August 2017 edit undo97.117.54.205 (talk) Again with the vandalism by unresponsible user.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == August 2017 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''You have broken the link to ] three times now. If you do so again, I'll ask for an admin to block you.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 17:10, 26 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself or ] so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||