| Revision as of 10:10, 7 October 2006 editPatstuart (talk | contribs)19,206 edits re: From grandia01 | Revision as of 10:17, 7 October 2006 edit undoPatstuart (talk | contribs)19,206 edits npaNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :From ]: "The Gospel is considered by the majority of academics (including Christians and some Muslims) to be late, pseudepigraphical and a pious fraud; however, some academics suggest that it may contain some remnants of an earlier apocryphal work edited to conform to Islam." I'm not sure that language could be any stronger. | :From ]: "The Gospel is considered by the majority of academics (including Christians and some Muslims) to be late, pseudepigraphical and a pious fraud; however, some academics suggest that it may contain some remnants of an earlier apocryphal work edited to conform to Islam." I'm not sure that language could be any stronger. | ||
| :Second, please avoid personal attacks (]) and conform to the 3RR rule (]). Thanks. -] 10:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC) | :Second, please avoid personal attacks (]) and conform to the 3RR rule (]). Thanks. -] 10:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Personal attacks== | |||
| Please see Misplaced Pages's ] policy. Comment on ''content'', not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to ] for disruption. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. <!-- Template:No personal attacks (npa2) --> -] 10:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:17, 7 October 2006
re: From grandia01
hi, can you please prove to me how the st. barnabas bible is a forgery??or is it just plain easy to say something like this from you?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grandia01 (talk • contribs)
- From Gospel of Barnabas: "The Gospel is considered by the majority of academics (including Christians and some Muslims) to be late, pseudepigraphical and a pious fraud; however, some academics suggest that it may contain some remnants of an earlier apocryphal work edited to conform to Islam." I'm not sure that language could be any stronger.
- Second, please avoid personal attacks (Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks) and conform to the 3RR rule (WP:3RR). Thanks. -Patstuart 10:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Personal attacks
Please see Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -Patstuart 10:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)