Revision as of 06:29, 19 September 2017 editK.e.coffman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers98,338 edits →Redirect: +← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:07, 19 September 2017 edit undoPoeticbent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,717 edits →Redirect: commentingNext edit → | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
*], which closed as "Delete" in September 2017. | *], which closed as "Delete" in September 2017. | ||
] (]) 06:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC) | ] (]) 06:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC) | ||
:*], with all your notable contributions to Misplaced Pages, you cannot actually do things like this. It is against our policy guidelines. You have deleted an article without ever launching a deletion discussion which is required in order to form the ]. Your example of ] was ill-suited, because it was a one-paragraph article (basically a stub) with one keep and two delete !votes in a controversial closure. On the other hand, this article was '''(-22,942)''' in size with 41 citations and 9 books in bibliography. Sure it was terribly ]ed, with statements like: ''"extreme battlefield bravery"'' and ''"successful military leadership"'', but that could have been fixed by you or someone else. Sorry, '''<font color="darkblue" face="Papyrus">]</font>''' <font style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">]</font> 16:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:07, 19 September 2017
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ernst-Georg Drünkler article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Notability
Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS coverage not found link.
No de.Wiki article.
Please also see a note at MilHist Talk Archives for background behind the redirect.
K.e.coffman (talk) 02:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes it is. Total higher than Allied aces bar M Pattle and one or two Soviet pilots. Dapi89 (talk) 12:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- WP:SOLDIER does not make a provision for high totals. What makes a subject notable is RS coverage that discusses the subject directly and in detail so that an NPOV bio can be created. Is there such coverage for the subject? K.e.coffman (talk) 01:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes. Dapi89 (talk) 16:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- WP:SOLDIER does not discuss totals, that doesn't mean Misplaced Pages considers them to be unimportant. This man is in the top 20 of the highest scoring night fighter pilots in history. That is more than enough. And he received the highest award for bravery (albeit not the highest grade of that award). Dapi89 (talk) 16:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes. Dapi89 (talk) 16:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- WP:SOLDIER does not make a provision for high totals. What makes a subject notable is RS coverage that discusses the subject directly and in detail so that an NPOV bio can be created. Is there such coverage for the subject? K.e.coffman (talk) 01:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Redirect
Restoring the redirect. The recent expansion has not been an improvement. The article copy mostly consists of WP:OR based on a collection of primary material:
- Foreman, John; Parry, Simon; Matthews, Johannes (2004). Luftwaffe Night Fighter Claims 1939–1945. Walton on Thames: Red Kite. ISBN 978-0-9538061-4-0.
The other large component is WP:SYNTH based on materials not about the subject. Misplaced Pages is not a publishing platform for original thought.
As a follow-up to the discussion above, successful completion of missions (sorties flown, # of enemy aircraft shot down, etc) is not part of SOLDIER. A MilHist RfC on this topic has failed to gain consensus in May of 2017:
For a relevant AfD on a WW2 German flying ace, please see:
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Fritz Lüddecke, which closed as "Delete" in September 2017.
K.e.coffman (talk) 06:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- K.e.coffman, with all your notable contributions to Misplaced Pages, you cannot actually do things like this. It is against our policy guidelines. You have deleted an article without ever launching a deletion discussion which is required in order to form the WP:CONSENSUS. Your example of Fritz Lüddecke was ill-suited, because it was a one-paragraph article (basically a stub) with one keep and two delete !votes in a controversial closure. On the other hand, this article was (-22,942) in size with 41 citations and 9 books in bibliography. Sure it was terribly WP:POVed, with statements like: "extreme battlefield bravery" and "successful military leadership", but that could have been fixed by you or someone else. Sorry, Poeticbent talk 16:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- Start-Class biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Start-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- Start-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Start-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- WikiProject Biography articles