Revision as of 01:59, 9 October 2006 editRiskAficionado (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,061 edits →{{User|Hassenfarooqi}}: sigh← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:00, 9 October 2006 edit undoWikiEditor2004 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users51,646 edits →{{User|Tankred}}Next edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Repeated personal attacks, since September. , (this happened several times well before also), but was more than unacceptable from him. --] 01:38, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | Repeated personal attacks, since September. , (this happened several times well before also), but was more than unacceptable from him. --] 01:38, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
:After I told ] not to remove vandalism and personal attack warning templates put to his/her user talk page in the past, he/she responded by placing the same templates on my own talk page. I really do not know what to do. I suspect him/her of being a sockpuppetmaster and this is obviously a kind of revenge against ]. I would like to ask some neutral admins to review his/her edits of my talk page and to remove the warning templates if they are not supported by evidence. My first alleged personal attack was when I asked him/her why he/she had lied and I provided evidence than his/her accusation was indeed a lie. Since all my edist are well-documented, it is easy to say whether VinceB lied or not. My conclusion was that he did. I was supposed to commit the second "personal attack" by merely telling him/her that he/she should not remove the warning templates. My alleged third "personal attack" was the above mentioned ]. ] 01:56, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | :After I told ] not to remove vandalism and personal attack warning templates put to his/her user talk page in the past, he/she responded by placing the same templates on my own talk page. I really do not know what to do. I suspect him/her of being a sockpuppetmaster and this is obviously a kind of revenge against ]. I would like to ask some neutral admins to review his/her edits of my talk page and to remove the warning templates if they are not supported by evidence. My first alleged personal attack was when I asked him/her why he/she had lied and I provided evidence than his/her accusation was indeed a lie. Since all my edist are well-documented, it is easy to say whether VinceB lied or not. My conclusion was that he did. I was supposed to commit the second "personal attack" by merely telling him/her that he/she should not remove the warning templates. My alleged third "personal attack" was the above mentioned ]. ] 01:56, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
::I also believe that User:VinceB wrote this as personal revenge to User:Tankred because User:Tankred opened a question of ]. It really should be checked whether User:VinceB is same person as that anonymous vandal that we deal with in last few days. ] ] 02:00, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:00, 9 October 2006
Noticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles, content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
This is a failed proposal. Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump. |
This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
ShortcutThis page is intended to get attention quickly when dealing with personal attacks. It is not intended to serve as a form of mediation or a type of RFC. Only Personal attacks are dealt with on this page, on their own merits in accordance with Misplaced Pages's No Personal Attacks policy
For editors who want a personal attack situation reviewed:
For users handling assistance requests:
Please consider adding this page to your watchlist to make life easier for non-administrator RC-patrollers. |
New reports
Tankred (talk · contribs)
Repeated personal attacks, since September. , (this happened several times well before also), but this was more than unacceptable from him. --VinceB 01:38, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- After I told User:VinceB not to remove vandalism and personal attack warning templates put to his/her user talk page in the past, he/she responded by placing the same templates on my own talk page. I really do not know what to do. I suspect him/her of being a sockpuppetmaster and this is obviously a kind of revenge against Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/VinceB. I would like to ask some neutral admins to review his/her edits of my talk page and to remove the warning templates if they are not supported by evidence. My first alleged personal attack was when I asked him/her why he/she had lied and I provided evidence than his/her accusation was indeed a lie. Since all my edist are well-documented, it is easy to say whether VinceB lied or not. My conclusion was that he did. I was supposed to commit the second "personal attack" by merely telling him/her that he/she should not remove the warning templates. My alleged third "personal attack" was the above mentioned Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/VinceB. Tankred 01:56, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- I also believe that User:VinceB wrote this as personal revenge to User:Tankred because User:Tankred opened a question of Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/VinceB. It really should be checked whether User:VinceB is same person as that anonymous vandal that we deal with in last few days. PANONIAN (talk) 02:00, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Rkinch (talk · contribs)
On Talk:Quiverfull, headings #5 and #6. Clearly making extended personal attacks aagainst me. CyberAnth 00:37, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Open reports
Ss06470 (talk · contribs)
User keeps trying to pull me into a debate over the article Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. I have informed him many times that Misplaced Pages is not an appropriate place for such a debate nor I am not interested in having a debate. He apparently has authored an unpublished article on the subject and was displeased at the removal of its references. It was explained to him why his edits were removed, and he then went to debating the topic itself. In doing so he's made several personal attacks, first against two other editors on the article, then directly towards me. I have notified him via the no personal attack templates (1st template, then a second non-template message, then the 3rd template) on his talk page. I have reverted the personal attacks he left on Talk:Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder but left the ones he placed on his talk page. His last personal attack was reinserting the removed comments from Talk:Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. -- Ned Scott 21:40, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AAttention-deficit_hyperactivity_disorder&diff=79634840&oldid=79606908
- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AAttention-deficit_hyperactivity_disorder&diff=79589176&oldid=79527893
- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AAttention-deficit_hyperactivity_disorder&diff=79370443&oldid=79317244
- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AAttention-deficit_hyperactivity_disorder&diff=78668176&oldid=78630119
- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AAttention-deficit_hyperactivity_disorder&diff=78624643&oldid=77876921
- Warned. Some of these personal attacks are several days old and this appears to be wrapped around a content dispute. Highly suggest dispute resolution. Shell 18:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Hassenfarooqi (talk · contribs)
User:Hassanfarooqi continues to engage in an aggressive manner, treating the wiki more as a battlefield than an encyclopaedia, although to date he has not been reprimanded for it.
- this user has a long recent history of making personal attacks against editors opposed to his viewpoint , , , , ,,,. there are many more diffs though i feel these are sufficient.
- he vandalized my talk page and with it made a personal attack due to my reversion of his tendentious edits.
- i gave him an {{npa3}} warning due to his previously being informed not to make accusations and his consistency in making outrageous personal attacks. to this, he responded as follows , accusing me of vandalism. he further continued in his attacks .
i would appreciate it if this could be looked into. thank you. ITAQALLAH 23:45, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Final Warning. Please report if the editor persists. Shell 14:28, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- editor has continued post-warning as such, using the pejorative term "wahhabi" . ITAQALLAH 01:59, 9 October 2006 (UTC)