Misplaced Pages

Template:Did you know nominations/Mausoleum of Abu Huraira: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Template:Did you know nominations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:31, 6 October 2017 editShrike (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,544 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 23:24, 7 October 2017 edit undoBlueMoonset (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers72,604 edits not ready for approval at this timeNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
* ... that the ''']''' has been called "one of the finest domed ]s in ]"? <small>Source: Petersen, 2001, p. 313</small> * ... that the ''']''' has been called "one of the finest domed ]s in ]"? <small>Source: Petersen, 2001, p. 313</small>
** '''ALT1''':... that the ‘’’]’’’, also known as the Tomb of Rabbi Gamaliel of Yavne, has been described as "one of the finest domed mausoleums in Palestine”? <small>Source: Petersen, 2001, p. 313</small> ** '''ALT1''':... that the ‘’’]’’’, also known as the Tomb of Rabbi Gamaliel of Yavne, has been described as "one of the finest domed mausoleums in Palestine”? <small>Source: Petersen, 2001, p. 313</small>
:*’’Reviewed’’ ]. ] (]) 17:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC) :*''Reviewed'' ]. ] (]) 17:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
<small>Moved to mainspace by ] (]) and ] (]). Nominated by ] (]) at 22:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC).</small> <small>Moved to mainspace by ] (]) and ] (]). Nominated by ] (]) at 22:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC).</small>


Line 25: Line 25:
:* New enough (but please in future give date moved from draft), long enough, reads well (though a bit confusing on the actual building history, or it its early phases), AGF on hook quote. Earwig finds nothing - or rather one one source that has not been used but should be - I've added a note on the article talk. GTG :* New enough (but please in future give date moved from draft), long enough, reads well (though a bit confusing on the actual building history, or it its early phases), AGF on hook quote. Earwig finds nothing - or rather one one source that has not been used but should be - I've added a note on the article talk. GTG
:*I suggest to wait till the RFC end to solve any NPOV issues. ] (]) 14:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC) :*I suggest to wait till the RFC end to solve any NPOV issues. ] (]) 14:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
::*] There was no icon given to the original, unsigned review, but the article should not be approved until problematic sentences like {{tq|The formation of Jewish sacred place was based on the argument that many Jewish sacred burials were Islamized during history of the region.}} have been fixed, and the tags in the article related to the RFC have been addressed. ] (]) 23:23, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 23:24, 7 October 2017

DYK toolbox

Mausoleum of Abu Huraira

( ) The portico facade, 2010The portico facade, 2010
  • ... that the Mausoleum of Abu Huraira has been called "one of the finest domed mausoleums in Palestine"? Source: Petersen, 2001, p. 313
    • ALT1:... that the ‘’’Mausoleum of Abu Huraira’’’, also known as the Tomb of Rabbi Gamaliel of Yavne, has been described as "one of the finest domed mausoleums in Palestine”? Source: Petersen, 2001, p. 313

Moved to mainspace by Huldra (talk) and Onceinawhile (talk). Nominated by Huldra (talk) at 22:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC).


  • New enough (but please in future give date moved from draft), long enough, reads well (though a bit confusing on the actual building history, or it its early phases), AGF on hook quote. Earwig finds nothing - or rather one one source that has not been used but should be - I've added a note on the article talk. GTG
  • I suggest to wait till the RFC end to solve any NPOV issues. Shrike (talk) 14:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
  • There was no icon given to the original, unsigned review, but the article should not be approved until problematic sentences like The formation of Jewish sacred place was based on the argument that many Jewish sacred burials were Islamized during history of the region. have been fixed, and the tags in the article related to the RFC have been addressed. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:23, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Category: