Misplaced Pages

Chabad-Lubavitch related controversies: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:09, 14 August 2017 editSkywatcher68 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,347 editsm Undid revision 795516241 by Special:Contributions/2600:8807:7F04:600:513A:DCB0:AEA7:DAC5 reverted unexplained removal of content.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:22, 29 October 2017 edit undoדברי.הימים (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers20,044 edits Redirected page to Chabad#Controversies 
(32 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#redirect ]
{{Chabad sidebar}}
''']''' is a branch of ]. During its nearly 300-year history, a number of controversies, though mostly unrelated to one another, have arisen. Some incidents have centered on religious beliefs and practices of the Chabad movement and the reaction of other ] communities.

'''Criticisms of Chabad''' have occurred throughout the movement's history where religious leaders from other Jewish groups opposed Chabad positions on religious, social and political matters.

==Major controversies==

===1810s: Chabad and Strashelye===
Rabbi ], the son and successor of Rabbi Shneur Zalman, was challenged by a friend and senior disciple of his father, ], on the matter of Rabbi Dovber's succession as rebbe of Chabad. The differences between the two led Rabb Aaron to form the ] movement.

When Rabbi Schneur Zalman died, a number of chasidim chose to follow Rabbi Aharon HaLevi of Strashelye, a close disciple of Rabbi Shneur Zalman. The majority of the movement, however, remained followers of Rabbi Dovber.

One of the main points the two rabbis disagreed on was the place of spiritual ecstasy in prayer. R' Aharon supported the idea while Rabbi Dovber emphasized genuine ecstasy can only be a result of meditative contemplation (]). Rabbi Dovber published his arguments on the subject in an compilation titled ''Kuntres Hispa'alus'' ("Tract on Ecstasy").<ref>Ehrlich, Leadership in the HaBaD Movement, pp. 160–192, esp. pp. 167–172.</ref>

===1860s: Aftermath of the death of Tzemach Tzedek===
Following the death of the third rebbe of Chabad, Rabbi ], the ''Tzemach Tzedek'', followers of the Chabad movement split their allegiances among the third rebbe's sons who had each become Rebbes in their own right. The sons were Rabbis Yehudah Leib of Kopys, Chaim Shneur Zalman of Liadi, Yisroel Noach of Nizhyn, Yosef Yitzchak of Ovruch and Shmuel Schneersohn of Lubavitch.

===1980s: The Chabad Library===
{{Main|Library of Agudas Chassidei Chabad}}
The ownership of the ] was the subject of a dispute which ultimately led to the filing of a ], resulting in the ruling that the Chabad-Lubavitch movement, represented by ], were the rightful owners of the Chabad Library.

The dispute occurred when ], the grandson of ] (the sixth ]), removed books from the Chabad Library and began selling them for personal profit. Gurary claimed the books as part of his inheritance from his late grandfather. According to Gurary, the Chabad Library belonged to his grandfather's estate.

Following the directives of Rabbi ] (the seventh ]), the ], the Chabad movement's central organization, filed a civil lawsuit to prevent Gurary from removing or selling any additional books. The Chabad movement argued that the library was the "communal property" of the Lubavitch Hasidim and not the "personal possessions" of the late Rebbe. They cited a letter written by the late Rebbe himself, supporting this notion.

The court ruled in favor of the Chabad movement, and the ruling was upheld on appeal.<ref>Agudas Chasidei Chabad of U.S. v. Gourary, 833 F.2d 431 (C.A.2 (N.Y.), 1987)</ref><ref></ref> In the Chabad community, the ruling is celebrated on ]; the day is called "Didan Notzach" ("our ruling was victorious").

=== 1990s: Chabad messianism ===
{{Main|Chabad messianism}}
A few years before the seventh Rebbe's passing, members of the Chabad movement expressed their belief that the Rabbi ] is the ]. These beliefs have been termed "Chabad messianism", and those subscribing to the beliefs have been termed ''Meshichists'' (messianists). A number of Jewish leaders have publicly voiced their concerns and/or opposition towards certain aspects of Chabad messianism.

A mantra recited by a number of Chabad messianists proclaiming Schneerson as the messiah is the "Yechi".<ref>The full text is "''Yechi Adoneinu Moreinu v'Rabbeinu Melech haMoshiach l'olam vo'ed''" ("Long Live our Master, our Teacher, and our Rabbi, King Messiah, for ever and ever).</ref> Customs vary among messianists as to when the phrase is recited.

Messianic beliefs concerning Schneerson vary a great deal. Controversy exists over whether he actually died and will be resurrected as the messiah, or whether he is simply "in hiding" until his final advent. To date, no study reports the number of Chabad Chasidim who hold these beliefs.<ref name="Identifying Chabad-p30">{{cite book|title=Identifying Chabad : what they teach and how they influence the Torah world.|date=2007|publisher=Center for Torah Demographics|location=Illinois|isbn=978-1411642416|page=30|edition=Revised|url=https://books.google.de/books?id=-_4eAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA13&dq=|accessdate=29 June 2016}} ( "]")</ref>

==Major criticisms==

===1770s to 1790s: Early opposition===
In the course of the Chabad movement's establishment, opponents (]) arose among the local Jewish community. Disagreements between Hasidim and their opponents included debates concerning knives used by butchers for ], the phrasing of prayers among others.<ref>See ''The Hasidic Movement and the Gaon of Vilna'' by Elijah Judah Schochet. For a full treatment of this subject see ''The Great Maggid'' by ], 3rd ed. 1990, ch. X, {{ISBN|0-8266-0414-5}}.</ref> Shneur Zalman and a fellow Hasidic leader, ] (or, according to the tradition in the Soloveitchik family, ]), attempted to persuade the leader of Lithuanian Jewry, the ], of the legitimacy of Hasidic practices. However, the ''Gaon'' refused to meet with them.<ref></ref>

===1940s: World War Two===
Rabbi ], the sixth Chabad Rebbe, escaped Nazi occupied Poland, and settled in ]. Some time after his arrival in New York, Rabbi Yoseph Yitzchok issued a call for repentance, stating ''L'alter l'tshuva, l'alter l'geula'' ("speedy repentance brings a speedy redemption"). This campaign was opposed by Rabbis ] and ] of the '']''. In return, Rabbi Yosef Yitzchok was critical of the efforts of Rabbis Kalmanowitz and Kotler based on the suspicion that Kalmanowitz and Kotler were discriminating in their use of funds, placing their yeshivas before all else, and that the ] and ] withdrew their support of the Vaad after they discovered this fact.<ref>Rigg, Bryan Mark. ''Rescued from the Reich''. Cambridge University Press. 2005.</ref>

===1960s: Tefillin campaign===
During 1967, prior to the ], the seventh Chabad Rebbe, Rabbi ] launched a "Tefilin campaign" which encouraged the Jewish commandment (]) of the donning of ] especially by non-affiliated Jews. Within the ] community, criticism of the campaign was voiced at the ] convention of 1968. However, following the incident, Rabbi ], a prominent Orthodox rabbi who had corresponded with Schneersohn in the past,<ref>Igros Kodesh, M.M. Schneerson, Kehot 1998 Vol. 7, pp. 2,49,192,215; Vol. 12, pp. 28,193; Vol. 14, pp. 167,266; Vol. 18, p. 251; Vol. 25, pp. 18-20; and Vol. 26, p. 485.</ref> wrote to Schneerson privately, distancing himself from the convention. Hutner wrote that he had not been at the convention and asked forgiveness for any pain his earlier letters (discussing halachic issues regarding the tefillin campaign) may have caused.<ref>Mibeis Hagenozim, B. Levin, Kehot 2009, p.89.</ref>

===1980s: Public menorahs===
During the 1980s, the Chabad movement initiated a large number of ] lightings celebrating the Jewish holiday of ]. These actions resulted in a number of court cases and city council decisions involving such public displays. While some cases resulted in a ban on menorah display, most court decisions, including one by the ],<ref></ref> upheld Chabad's display of public menorahs.<ref>Mark A. Kaplan v. City of Burlington and Robert Whalen (12/12/89)United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 89-7042; 891 F.2d 1024</ref><ref>Chabad-Lubavitch of Vermont v. City of Burlington, 936 F.2d 109 (C.A.2 (Vt.), 1991)</ref><ref>''New Twist to Old Fight: Menorah in Vermont Park'', Sally Johnson, ''New York Times'', December 20, 1987</ref><ref>Lubavitch Chabad House, Inc. v. City of Chicago, 917 F.2d 341 (C.A.7 (Ill.), 1990)</ref><ref>Lubavitch of Iowa, Inc. v. Walters, 808 F.2d 656 (C.A.8 (Iowa), 1986)</ref><ref>Congregation Lubavitch v. City of Cincinnati, 923 F.2d 458 (C.A.6 (Ohio), 1991)</ref><ref>Chabad-Lubavitch of Georgia v. Miller, 5 F.3d 1383 (C.A.11 (Ga.), 1993)</ref><ref>"White Plains Council Blocks Electric Menorah for Park", Lisa W. Foderaro, December 3, 1991</ref><ref>"Menorah displays stir jewish rift", ''Miami Herald'', June 14, 1987</ref><ref name="lkl">"Christmas trees put back at SeaTac airport", Gene Johnson, Associated Press, December 13, 2006</ref>

===1980s: Rabbi Elazar Shach===
Rabbi ], considered the leading ] rabbi in ] at the time and the second most prominent Ashkenazi Orthodox Rabbi in the world after Rav Moses Feinstein, raised a number of criticisms of the ] and the Chabad movement.<ref>See ''Michtavim u'Ma'amarim'' : Volume 1, Letter 6 (page 15), Letter 8 (page 19). Volume 3, Statements on pages 100-101, Letter on page 102. Volume 4, letter 349 (page 69), letter 351 (page 71). Volume 5, letter 533 (page 137), letter 535 (page 139), speech 569 (page 173), statement 570 (page 174); see </ref><ref>]. ''The Rebbe, the Messiah, and the Scandal of Orthodox Indifference'', Littman Library of Jewish Civilization (Portland), 2001, p. 7.</ref> During the 1980s, Shach publicly criticized Chabad's ]s.<ref>Michtavim U'maamarim, volume 1, edition 2, p. 49, Letter of Protest signed by Rabbis Shach and Kanievsky</ref> Shach, a vocal critic, compared Schneerson to the 17th-century false messiah ],<ref> ('']'') February 14, 2001</ref> and labeled Schneerson a "false messiah" (''meshiach sheker'').<ref name=Nadler>Allan Nadler. </ref> Just before the 1988 Israeli election, Schneerson had encouraged Israeli ] to vote for the ] party. This was seen as detrimental to the newly formed ] party which was supported by Rabbi Shach.<ref name="Fate pg. 340">Berel Wein, Faith and Fate: The Story of the Jewish People in the 20th century, Shaar Press, 2001, p. 340.</ref>
The involvement of Schneerson in Israeli politics was seen as an attempt to take over Jewish life in Israel.

==Other controversies and criticisms==
A number of controversies have arisen within the Chabad movement.

===United States===
*An offshoot group, the ] was formed by Rabbi ] in ].<ref>B. Sobel, ''The M’lochim''</ref><ref>Ehrlich, Leadership in the HaBaD Movement, pp. 269–271</ref><ref>Jerome R. Mintz, Hasidic People, pp. 21–26</ref>
*Tensions between Chabad and Satmar Chasidim in the 1980s resulted in several assaults by Satmar hasids.<ref name="beardcut">''Jew cleared in beard-cutting case'', Philadelphia Daily News, May 25, 1984</ref><ref name="anguish"></ref><ref>Letters to the Editor, ''Time'', August 1, 1983</ref>
*An attempt by ] to form a breakaway Chabad movement failed to gain popular support.<ref name="rebbe">"Dissidents Name 'Rebbe'," ''The Forward'', December 6, 1996</ref><ref>Heinon, Herb, "Bigger than Death," ''Jerusalem Post'', August 15, 1997</ref><ref>Segall, Rebecca, "Holy Daze The problems of young Lubavitcher Hasidim in a world without the Rebbe," ''The Village Voice'', September 30, 2000</ref>
*A dispute over the legal ownership of the Chabad central synagogue in ], ], resulted in a court decision giving ownership to ] and ].<ref>''Who controls Lubavitch headquarters?'', David Berger, Jerusalem Post, April 22, 2006</ref><ref>''Cuff 9 in rabbi row'', The New York Daily News, December 16, 2004</ref><ref>''Rough and Rebbe Brawler - I fight for Superman'', Denise Buffa, New York Post, December 17, 2004</ref><ref></ref><ref name="jewek"> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080106075421/http://www.thejewishweek.com/viewArticle/c36_a1611/News/New_York.html |date=January 6, 2008 }}</ref>
*A dispute concerning the administration of a bequeathed estate, involving two of Chabad's educational organizations, resulted in a court decision supporting the parties' original agreement.<ref>''How a Hefty Fee for an Ex-Governor Went Unnoticed'', Tom Robbins, The Village Voice, July 23–29, 2003</ref><ref name="a">''Judge Hits Hasidic Group's Estate Claim'', Bob Liff, The Daily News, October 02, 2000</ref><ref name="b"></ref><ref>{{dead link|date=November 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>

===Australia===
{{undue|date=May 2017}}
Chabad has been accused of covering up multiple claims of sexual abuse at their institutions in Australia<ref name=haaretz_sex_hearing>{{cite web
|last=Goldberg
|first=Dan
|title=Australian Jews Distraught Over Chabad Sex Abuse Hearings
|publisher=Haaretz
|date=February 10, 2015
|url=http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/news/.premium-1.641733
|accessdate=January 7, 2016
|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160129184847/http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/news/.premium-1.641733
|archivedate=January 29, 2016
|deadurl=bot: unknown
|df=
}}</ref><ref name=royal_commission>{{cite web
| authorlink = Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse
| title = Case Study 22, February 2015, Melbourne
| publisher = Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse
| url = http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/a5fd40f7-d96c-4043-9801-d4490fba4188/case-study-22,-february-2015,-melbourne
| accessdate = January 7, 2016 }}</ref> and of retaliating against whistleblowers and victims.<ref name=haaretz_sex_hearing/><ref name=guardian_sex>{{cite web
| last = Marr
| first = David
| authorlink = David Marr (journalist)
| title = Rabbis' absolute power: how sex abuse tore apart Australia's Orthodox Jewish community
| publisher = The Guardian
| date = February 18, 2015
| url = https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/feb/19/rabbis-absolute-power-how-sex-abuse-tore-apart-australias-orthodox-jewish-community
| accessdate = January 7, 2016 }}</ref> (see also ])
In two separate cases, two employees were convicted and jailed in 2013; and one director was convicted in 2014 with a suspended sentence.<ref name=haaretz_sex_hearing/> Several Chabad rabbis were found to have been publicly sermonizing that it was religiously forbidden to report child sex abuse to the police<ref name=royal_commission/><ref name=guardian_sex/> As of September 1, 2015, four Chabad Rabbis had resigned in relation to the controversy.<ref name=forward_sex>{{cite web
| title = Australian Chabad Rabbi Resigns Over Sex Abuse Scandal
| publisher = Forward
| date = September 1, 2015
| url = http://forward.com/news/breaking-news/320278/australian-chabad-rabbi-resigns-over-sex-abuse-scandal/
| accessdate = January 7, 2016 }}</ref> As a consequence of the revelations, one Chabad institution’s Committee of Management was to be replaced and to have its Board of Trustees disbanded.<ref name=jewishnews_sex>{{cite web
| last = Levi
| first = Joshua
| title = All change at the Yeshivah Centre
| publisher = Australian Jewish News
| date = June 18, 2015
| url = http://www.jewishnews.net.au/all-change-at-the-yeshivah-centre/42341
| accessdate = January 7, 2016 }}</ref>

Following an investigation by ] regarding sexual abuse of students at Chabad schools, in February 2015, a senior Chabad rabbi who is also son of Chabad's chief rabbi in Sydney, was removed as representative of the New York-based organization as the fallout from the child sex abuse investigation and public hearings. Rabbi Yosef Feldman, the Sydney Yeshivah Center's former director, was dismissed following comments to the Royal Commission suggesting that pedophiles who had refrained from sex crimes for two decades should be treated with leniency. Feldman sparked a "storm of protest" among Jewish leaders, and resigned his post at Yeshiva Center, which houses Chabad. As a result of the investigation and the testimony of victims and rabbinic leaders of Chabad in Australia, ], Member of the Victorian Legislative Council for Southern Metropolitan Region, son of a Jewish immigrant, has called on the Prime Minister and Premier to initiate action making the Chabad Yeshiva more accountable. He proposed that financial support from the government be withheld until all leaders who helped cover up abuse resign. He further demanded the production of all reports, letters and emails related to the concealment of abuse, the creation and enforcement of clear, specific rules for Yeshiva leaders and the creation of a fund to compensate victims.<ref></ref> In an open letter to the Jewish community, Dalidakis acknowledged that he was shocked that the Yeshivas had allowed child sexual abuse to take place, had protected the perpetrators and had discouraged victims from reporting crimes to the police and had allowed, even participated in, the harassment and shunning of victims and their families. He added that it is not enough for individual leaders to resign at these particular schools: "The Yeshivah Centre, and the Chabad-Lubavitch movement which controls it, must accept corporate responsibility. They must accept that the abuse that took place was not just a matter of personal failure but also a failure of institutional structure and culture. These must be thoroughly reformed. There must be an end to secrecy, to concealment, and to automatic acceptance of the actions of figures of authority. There must be new values, and new rules to put those values into practice, before trust can be restored."<ref> Mannywaks.com, 26 March 2015</ref> ], community activist who founded Tzedek, an organization dedicated to protecting abuse victims and preventing abuse, is now working to establish a global inquiry into sexual abuse in the Jewish community, using the Royal Commission as a model.<ref> ABC, broadcast 2 April 2015</ref>

In February 2016 the educational branch of Chabad Headquarters in New York wrote to the trustees of the Yeshivah Centre objecting to its proposed restructuring, which was part of Yeshiva's response to the 2015 Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Yeshivah trustees had appointed five members to a Governance Review Panel (GRP) to recommend how the centre should be managed, including the Yeshivah, plus Beth Rivkah Colleges and all Chabad organizations in it. Rabbi Yisroel Deren of Chabad headquarters clarified the objections the Chabad HQ has made. He noted, however, that Rabbi Chaim Tzvi Groner in Melbourne has the authority to authorise the restructure that Chabad in NY is "powerless to stop any changes."<ref> Jewish News, Feb 4, 2016</ref> The intervention by the Chabad World Headquarters has angered sexual assault victims.<ref> ABC News, Feb 3, 2016</ref>

==References==
{{Reflist|27em}}

{{Jews and Judaism}}
{{Orthodox Judaism}}

]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 02:22, 29 October 2017

Redirect to: