| Revision as of 10:26, 2 November 2017 editMagnolia677 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers138,769 edits →Template:Bhad Bhabie: d← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:15, 2 November 2017 edit undoPigsonthewing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors266,337 edits →Template:Infobox UNESCO World Heritage Site: cNext edit → | ||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
| ** The RfC hasn't been closed yet (well, it was, but by the same person that's closed it twice already and been reverted, and has been reverted again - it needs a more neutral closer). What happens here depends on that, I think. My nominal plan was to separate out the existing template to {{tl|Infobox World Heritage Site}} and {{tl|Infobox World Heritage Site/Wikidata}}, for which I have a bot ready to run. It doesn't make sense to have three versions of the same template, though, so if that happens then I think that {{tl|Infobox UNESCO World Heritage Site}} should be merged into {{tl|Infobox World Heritage Site}}. Thanks. ] (]) 08:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC) | ** The RfC hasn't been closed yet (well, it was, but by the same person that's closed it twice already and been reverted, and has been reverted again - it needs a more neutral closer). What happens here depends on that, I think. My nominal plan was to separate out the existing template to {{tl|Infobox World Heritage Site}} and {{tl|Infobox World Heritage Site/Wikidata}}, for which I have a bot ready to run. It doesn't make sense to have three versions of the same template, though, so if that happens then I think that {{tl|Infobox UNESCO World Heritage Site}} should be merged into {{tl|Infobox World Heritage Site}}. Thanks. ] (]) 08:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC) | ||
| *Keep. Unnecessary fork? It is a better version which avoids the many problems the other template has. Nominating this for deletion during the RfC at ] is more a case of making a ] than anything else, no actual reason for deletion has been given which would apply here. ] (]) 05:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC) | *Keep. Unnecessary fork? It is a better version which avoids the many problems the other template has. Nominating this for deletion during the RfC at ] is more a case of making a ] than anything else, no actual reason for deletion has been given which would apply here. ] (]) 05:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC) | ||
| **The POINTy action was the creation of the nominated template. Get the beam out of your own eye. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 12:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:15, 2 November 2017
| < October 31 | November 2 > |
|---|
November 1
Template:Bhad Bhabie
- Template:Bhad Bhabie (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Only one article for a song exists; the rest cannot be navigated to as they have no articles. Ss112 21:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Magnolia677 (talk) 10:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Template:2013 Victory League table
unused, duplicates table in 2013 Football Federation Tasmania season#2013 NPL Tasmania Frietjes (talk) 21:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Template:Pies Descalzos track listing
unused, track listing templates have been generally deprecated in favour of using the chronology links in the infobox, and the list of singles/songs in the navbox. Frietjes (talk) 19:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Template:Pharmacology journals
unused, the standard way of navigating between journals in a particular category is to use the parent category. Frietjes (talk) 19:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Template:Phases of matter (classical elements)
unused, duplicates navigation found in Template:Classic element Frietjes (talk) 19:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Template:Niki & The Dove
- Template:Niki & The Dove (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Articles include one album and single (from the same album) so navigation isn't improved by this navbox. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 19:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Template:Periods of pre-Mongol Mongolia
unused, duplicates navigation found in Template:History of Mongolia Frietjes (talk) 19:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Template:Participate in TWMC
unused, TWMC was Nov 15, 2011 - Feb 29, 2012 so not likely that this will be used in the future Frietjes (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Template:Paraguay NFT results
unused, and almost entirely redlinks Frietjes (talk) 19:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Template:Panama Squad 2012 FIFA Futsal World Championship
- Template:Panama Squad 2012 FIFA Futsal World Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused, squad membership is preserved in 2012 FIFA Futsal World Cup squads#.C2.A0Panama Frietjes (talk) 19:11, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Kante4 (talk) 19:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Template:Palau presidential election, 2004
unused, duplicates Palauan general election, 2004#President Frietjes (talk) 19:08, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Template:Zimbabwe Squad 2006 ICC Champions Trophy
- Template:Zimbabwe Squad 2006 ICC Champions Trophy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Bangladesh Squad 2006 ICC Champions Trophy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Zimbabwe and Bangladesh didn't make it out of the qualifying round and the members of all the squads are already stored in 2006 ICC Champions Trophy squads Frietjes (talk) 13:42, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as template is used for nav purposes. It is not football kind of qualifying round. So, what is wrong? Störm (talk) 13:45, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- it's been well-established here at TfD that we don't keep roster navigational boxes for non-medal-winning squads. Frietjes (talk) 13:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Now the template has been inserted in all the articles related to Zimbabwean cricketers who have played in the 2006 ICC Champions Trophy. Abishe (talk) 15:35, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of Godric 08:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Template:England Squad 2006 ICC Champions Trophy
- Template:England Squad 2006 ICC Champions Trophy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:India Squad 2006 ICC Champions Trophy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Pakistan Squad 2006 ICC Champions Trophy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Sri Lanka Squad 2006 ICC Champions Trophy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
England, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka didn't make it past the group stage and the members of all the squads are already stored in 2006 ICC Champions Trophy squads. Frietjes (talk) 13:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per my previous comment. We generally have such templates and same is true for other sports where participating teams have templates of their squads. This is different from Olympics medal winning team. Störm (talk) 18:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- it's been well-established here at TfD that we don't keep roster navigational boxes for non-medal-winning or non-championship-winning squads. Frietjes (talk) 13:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as the templates generally used in articles related to cricket are acceptable and templates cannot be compared with separate article for squads as you mentioned 2006 ICC Champions Trophy squads without needing templates. Abishe (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of Godric 08:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Template:Nicolae Ceaușescu
not a proper navigational aid, most of this is only tangentially related at best Ten Pound Hammer • 05:46, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep (?), seems a fine template. I came here for another template and find things like this up for deletion. 'Not a proper nav aid', 'tangentially related', no, it is a perfectly fine template. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ 23:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Mostly tangentially related entries. Titles that he held, or floods and earthquakes, etc, that happened to occur during his Presidency are not directly related to him. --woodensuperman 15:14, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of Godric 08:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Template:Infobox UNESCO World Heritage Site
Unnecessary fork of {{Infobox World Heritage Site}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 07:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- From what I can see, one uses wikidata, the other does not. Given that wikidata is likely going to be restricted even further from use on ENWP, this nomination should be reversed. Only in death does duty end (talk) 08:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- The RFC on Infobox_World_Heritage_Site has been closed with a result revert back to the non-Wikidata version. There is a proposed bot-request that would juggle existing articles to temporarily use a new wikidata-only template so that Infobox_World_Heritage_Site can be converted to non-wikidata. However I'd like to ping Mike Peel and Fram as probably the experts on these templates. Would it make sense to simply convert existing articles to this template, rather than juggling and converting Infobox_World_Heritage_Site? I haven't studied the templates enough to have an opinion yet on whether this makes sense or would be desirable. Alsee (talk) 00:03, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Converting them all to Template:Infobox UNESCO World Heritage Site would make the most sense. Fram (talk) 05:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- The RfC hasn't been closed yet (well, it was, but by the same person that's closed it twice already and been reverted, and has been reverted again - it needs a more neutral closer). What happens here depends on that, I think. My nominal plan was to separate out the existing template to {{Infobox World Heritage Site}} and {{Infobox World Heritage Site/Wikidata}}, for which I have a bot ready to run. It doesn't make sense to have three versions of the same template, though, so if that happens then I think that {{Infobox UNESCO World Heritage Site}} should be merged into {{Infobox World Heritage Site}}. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Unnecessary fork? It is a better version which avoids the many problems the other template has. Nominating this for deletion during the RfC at Template talk:Infobox World Heritage Site is more a case of making a WP:POINT than anything else, no actual reason for deletion has been given which would apply here. Fram (talk) 05:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- The POINTy action was the creation of the nominated template. Get the beam out of your own eye. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)