| Revision as of 12:37, 12 November 2017 editBonadea (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers151,323 edits No.← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:37, 12 November 2017 edit undoVan danken (talk | contribs)122 edits Undid revision 809936435 by Bonadea (talk) this is my talk, I will do what I wishNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| == NPOV and your new category == | == NPOV and your new category == | ||
Revision as of 12:37, 12 November 2017
.svg)
NPOV and your new category
Firstly follow the above advice and abide by WP:NPOV. Your removal of terror categories and a few others without reasoning and the imposition of your own republican cateory can be regarded as a lack of NPOV. Secondly whilst I am tempted to do it, seeing as it is your creation, do you mind fixing the category name and all of its inclusions? I assume you didn't mean to use "Goody Friday". Mabuska 18:08, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, you are confused. I removed those categories because they are redundant. Whats the point in having both the article in both the "terrorist incidents in london" category and the "terrorists incidents in the uk" category? That seems very redundant to me.
- Then what is your reason for removing it from the Omagh article? I don't see any parent or child terrorism cats that make it redundant. If the categories you removed are a child or parent of categories listed alongside it then I can agree about redundancy but not if they aren't. Did you check or just remove them based on a hunch? Mabuska 22:06, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, I made a mistake there. I have put it back in.
- Don't forget to fix the Goody Friday category name mistake :-) Mabuska 11:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Welsh Labour
Please don't leave misleading edit summaries. A previous editor was bold, they were reverted the next stage is that they discuss. This is covered in WP:BRD. You are not reverting edit warring, you were edit warring. This matter has been discussed before many times on different political party pages so there is a strong body of prior discussion to draw on. I see from the history on this page you have already been made aware of the WP:BRD guideline so please respect it ----Snowded 21:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
AN/I
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Bastun 00:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
November 2017
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 00:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 11:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Van danken (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
"racist attacks, eg edit summary "(Undid revision 809866643 by Bastun (talk) untermensch stalker)"The above is the reason given for my ban. The label "racist attacks" is completely bizarre considering untermensch is not a racial term, as the article of the term makes clear.
Now that this has been cleared up I would like to apologise for the personal attacks and will not do it again. I believe an indefinite ban for personal attacks is very harsh.Van danken (talk) 12:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2="racist attacks, eg edit summary "(Undid revision 809866643 by Bastun (talk) untermensch stalker)" The above is the reason given for my ban. The label "racist attacks" is completely bizarre considering ] is not a racial term, as the article of the term makes clear. Now that this has been cleared up I would like to apologise for the personal attacks and will not do it again. I believe an indefinite ban for personal attacks is very harsh.] (]) 12:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1="racist attacks, eg edit summary "(Undid revision 809866643 by Bastun (talk) untermensch stalker)" The above is the reason given for my ban. The label "racist attacks" is completely bizarre considering ] is not a racial term, as the article of the term makes clear. Now that this has been cleared up I would like to apologise for the personal attacks and will not do it again. I believe an indefinite ban for personal attacks is very harsh.] (]) 12:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1="racist attacks, eg edit summary "(Undid revision 809866643 by Bastun (talk) untermensch stalker)" The above is the reason given for my ban. The label "racist attacks" is completely bizarre considering ] is not a racial term, as the article of the term makes clear. Now that this has been cleared up I would like to apologise for the personal attacks and will not do it again. I believe an indefinite ban for personal attacks is very harsh.] (]) 12:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}